+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Absolutely nonsense! No one is ever a failure and only selfish tw*ts would think in such moronic terms.
You actually can't make it up.
Welfare bill rises enormously because of triple lock.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...-b1105958.html
Sunak's answer is to cut benefits in real terms while maintaining the triple lock.
With the Tories almost certain to lose the next election, it wouldn't surprise me if they scrapped it. They'll then promise to reinstate it which will put pressure on Labour to do so during their time in office.
i hate pensioners more than you do. a pensioner hate off, how bizarre.
Means testing the State Pension, which is a less than generous state pension across the board in terms of Europe, would mean that someone who has been financially responsible and saved for their old age may receive little or nothing whilst someone who has contributed equally may receive the full whack because they squandered their lifelong income on smoking, drinking and foreign holidays etc. Or should the former group start distributing their capital artfully shortly before reaching pension age?
https://www.almondfinancial.co.uk/pe...est-of-europe/
(By the way, my very modest German State Pension represents 4.1% of my UK State Pension although only 2.7% of my working life was spent contributing over there - and it was at the beginning of my working life when I wasn't on particularly good money. Even taking into account the comparative Cost of Living in both countries, our State Benefit isn't great.)
Pensions i doubt will ever be means tested, Those who make the decisions do very nicely, however, the politics of envy shine in this fred, they despise those who just get up in the morning go to work and get paid for the effort, they have never been the same since Dustbin got obliterated by Johnson and lost their promise of free WIFI.
But that is looking at it in a vaccuum rather than within the context of wider economy and challenges/needs. Our unemployment benefit lags even further behind our counterparts in Europe, nobody seems to be shooting for a triple lock on that though. Our median income will soon be worse than countries like Poland and Slovenia. Our lowest earners are already amongst the poorest compared to statistical neighbours, the list goes on..
I don't think you can just start means testing state pension and pull the rug overnight but if the methodology behind keeping the triple lock is that inflation matching rises are costly but necessary then I don't know how that is squared with the fact that 25% of over 65s live in a household with > 1 million in assets. Maybe the massive increase should have been means tested or upon application.
Just to reiterate - £500 more in tax per working person in the UK just to fund next years expect 8% rise.. I don't blame ordinary people for voting in line with their interests (although that isn't something I tend to do) but if you are over 65 and have children/grandchildren that you care about, I would urge them to look again at the sums around keeping the triple lock. By it's design it WILL bankrupt the country, is that really a policy you want to defend.
This country is resembling a ponzi right now.
I think it is still defined as a benefit by the government.
Most people won't have paid enough NI to cover even a few years of state pension, it is a ponzi that current working age people pay for.
Ironically the current pensioners were quite happy for the older generations (their parents and grandparents) to die in poverty and freeze to death when they were the ones contributing to the system rather than taking from it. Now the shoe is on the other foot and it's envy to suggest that if we are looking to target cuts then maybe the triple lock is something to take a second glance at
It is a benefit but subject to a minimum number of years contributions having being made. However, someone could have spent their entire life unemployed and still have qualified for the State Pension because the government will have made those contributions on the claimant's behalf.
Like someone pointed out elsewhere in the thread the UK's state pension provision is woefully short compared to European equivalent pensions. The introduction of the Triple Lock was an attempt to address pensioner poverty but it only serves to provide one huge chunk of pensioners with more than they'll ever need which means it ends up in the pockets of their offspring, while being grossly insufficient to meet the basic needs of the other great chunk of pensioners. It's a blunt instrument which is unsustainable for much longer.
but a quarter of all pensioners have retired with enough cash to get a helicopter to the post office on a Thursday , paying loads of NI , a 'ponzi' if you like ,that was always the point , you pay for the generation that has retired, but to be fair i laffed like f@@@ watching my parents freeze to death.
I think the same about people in Wales moaning about drakeford, 20mph zones, traffic zones that cause more air pollution, no more roads, an "airport" that has bigger all flights etc - people voted for Labour so enjoy your moaning.
As for triple lock - yes it needs amending. Corbyn wasnt the answer (too left wing), Starmer isnt the answer either - so not sure where that leaves the socialists. Probably a govt in waiting - waiting to stuff things up again - like most Govt's before it. Blair / Brown - boom and bust - yeah cant wait for that (I did ok out of those policies)