Reply With Quote
Youve proved over months that youre unwilling, or more likely, unable to answer Doucas question, so I dont understand why you bothered replying to me.Originally Posted by TWGL1
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Nice shit stirring old timer - great intervention- why don’t you answer it and put us all out of our misery?
https://www.google.co.uk/?gfe_rd=cr&...4DA&gws_rd=ssl
Youve proved over months that youre unwilling, or more likely, unable to answer Doucas question, so I dont understand why you bothered replying to me.
I’ve pointed out numerous times where to find the answer, and to assist you further I’ve presented a link. If you’re that curious use the link and post the answer back on here.
I’ve not posted it as it’s not something I’m remotely interested in and as far as I know neither is anyone else. It’s not a gotcha moment. Let me know how you get on.
Dorcas plays the man all the time.
Not remotely interested in the subject, yet you start a thread entitled “Climate fanatics - where are you?” which is now on its eighth page partly thanks to your thirty three messages on the subject
Im not specifically interested in the question hes asked 30 times on this forum, but as you appear to be, can you post the answer to put the question hes raised thirty times to bed ?Not remotely interested in the subject, yet you start a thread entitled Climate fanatics - where are you? which is now on its eighth page partly thanks to your thirty three messages on the subject
Do you want the Google link again - as thats where I found it just like him.Its amazing what information you can get from a football forum.
A pretty feeble swerve if I may say so. I don’t know the answer to Doucas’ question, but it wasn’t addressed to me, because, according to you, I’m a climate fanatic.
I wouldnt have a clue what you are , but your opinion is welcomed all the same as long as its delivered with the knowledge that other peoples opinions may differ. Intelligent discontent is part of free speech and pile ons get the responses they deserve.
“intelligent discontent”?
Climate fanatics - where are you !!
Well they have basically looked at the rising fuel, manufacturers, gas, electric costs, and said bugger this we do need fossil fuels in the interim to keep us rich never mind the poorer folk we sometimes wave at..
And our selfish net zero targets we once set from our comfatable middle class lives is now biting us, so let's relax our targets as we're losing incomes.
Careful your upsetting the high priest gang of socialism, where it's our view or ridicule.. Or rudeness, tough keyboard warriors.
Must be an age thing, underachieving, or simply grumpy old men syndrome ??
where do you think you would you end up after the filtering ?
Well I don't think the earth is flat so..
Nope. Nobody has answered it. Not even one attempt.
They deflect and insult, they rant about how they know more about triple glazing so therefore know more about the environment. They say that just like the earth being a globe the causes of climate change are just a theory.
They bizarrely tell me to Google the answer even though that makes no sense because I believe in what scientists are saying is causing climate change, while they don't.
Yet they cannot tell me what it is they disagree with about the physical process behind climate change.
I genuinely don't think they understand the question.
scamsla.jpg
And the abuse of children to achieve it.
NY.jpg
Shouldn't Manhattan be underwater ?
Goal posts moved again at the recent COP scam, it's gonna be in the next 50 years now
For the clever ones, obviously the top is a drawing, but I would guess representative of the time
After working for 40 years in the world of maritime navigation I thought the following article may possibly be enlightening for those who may be interested in the geological and tidal data relating to Manhattan. It's no profound cut and paste internet meme though - and was written by those pesky consipracy theorist scientists.NY.jpg
Shouldn't Manhattan be underwater ?
Goal posts moved again at the recent COP scam, it's gonna be in the next 50 years now
For the clever ones, obviously the top is a drawing, but I would guess representative of the time
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley....9/2022EF003465
At the same time anyone who installs 30/40 year old tech and refuses to have children in the basis of climate change cannot be taken seriously.
As an aside , I deal daily with stakeholders in the housing industry who get premiums when they adhere to net zero standards and regulations so perhaps, my knowledge in field, is slightly more relevant than you think.
Can you tell me what your carbon footprint is as so far you have not got back to me on it either despite being asked on numerous occasions.
Youre in line for a virtue signaller of the year award on this platform. IMG_4316.jpg
Interesting article. Too much for me to read in its entirety but the summary will do me! Obviously a very complicated geology underneath NYC and I hadn't thought about subsidence/settlement having a role alongside sea level rising. Happy days.
If sea levels aren't rising, people will find something else to worry about..
It does to the people who live on the islands.
over the lifetime of a vehicle and electric vehicle is significantly more sustainable than an ICE
At least I can carry on purchasing my ICE until at least 2035, and who knows if that date will be pushed back, just like the most recent one.
Mark Zuck disagrees, he's building his new extravaganza on the island of Hawaii
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/m...erty-s88w6phfl
It's all good though, he'll probably have a submarine like Epstein!!! for when we have the apocalypse
Another case of do as I say.
Just remember: climate change is the most important issue in the world, but it’s not important enough to operate safe, emissions-free power plants (nuclear).
@RJK....I am with Heathblue on this......a complete desecration of earth resource and often child labour.
Posting Permissions