Who would be your choice...

[Undercoverinwurzelland]

... out of these managers who've all been linked?

[Hilts]

Out of Beale , Evatt , Buckingham , Ramsey.

Then Ramsey by a distance.

Seeing as those they are paying for outside advice then hopefully the short list is far better than the above options.

[Tuerto]

Out of Beale , Evatt , Buckingham , Ramsey.

Then Ramsey by a distance.

Seeing as those they are paying for outside advice then hopefully the short list is far better than the above options.

Why Ramsey by a distance? What do you see in him, because I can't make any calls on his ability to manage. Just a personal preference?

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Why Ramsey by a distance? What do you see in him, because I can't make any calls on his ability to manage. Just a personal preference?

Ramsey has no meaningful managerial experience. Sounds like a great fit.

[Hilts]

Why Ramsey by a distance? What do you see in him, because I can't make any calls on his ability to manage. Just a personal preference?

I would just prefer to have Ramsey along with the coaching staff he brought in and see if he can make his mark at this level.

Id like to think hes learned from the coaching staff hes worked at during his career.

Evatt and Buckingham. Both recently sacked dont inspire me with any confidence and let's just forget Michael Beale.

I'm only saying id prefer Ramsey to those lot.

As they've hired and are paying for advice then I'm hoping better candidates are being considered and it's someone not currently linked.

If it's between Evatt and Buckingham then why waste more money for advice if that's what they come up with. I think its highly likely both have applied.

If Rob Page is being considered mind id happily drive Evatt or Buckingham here.

[the other bob wilson]

Wasted vote by me, I went for Wellens.

[llan bluebird]

I voted Jones but i don't think its even a possibility. We need a builder, and thats what he does, build teams.

Challinor, Evatt, Edwards & Buckingham have promotion on their CV, Wellens may have, but there are lots of sackings to boot.

Rambo, Elphick, Beale and Selles haven't won many accolades in management, I want form in the book, not potential.

If Jones is non starter then i don't care out of Challinor, Evatt, Edwards or Buckingham

[Rontomuk]

I picked Ramsey, the others do not impress me at all. I thought that the three games that he and Gunter managed were ok and seemed the ideal partnership. A lot on here dismiss him because of our experience with unqualified managers in the past, but those two looked like a good partnership, and we could regret not giving them a chance

[BLUETIT]

EDWARDS

[Hilts]

I cant access the full site so can't see all the options.

Elphick I know little about. But I would have thought he'd be the type of candidate that we are paying consultants to look at.

Hopefully there are more being looked at but a manager with L1 experience seems popular including with our own Trust.

[Hilts]

Ok got on now. I voted Ramsey.

I didn't consider the in work managers as I think its a wasted vote.

[RichardM]

Wasted vote by me, I went for Wellens.

Me too

[RichardM]

Come on then, own up, who was it that voted for Beale?

[Hilts]

Come on then, own up, who was it that voted for Beale?

Swansea Fan?🤣

[Coyote]

I voted Selles as the most realistic option, though I'd like Edwards and Jones even more honestly.

[The Bloop]

The only decent experience that Ramsey can call on is from being in close proximity to those who couldn't do the job.

[Rontomuk]

The only decent experience that Ramsey can call on is from being in close proximity to those who couldn't do the job.

Such as Arsene Wenger, Gary Speed, Ryan Giggs, Dave Jones, and Chris Coleman.

[Des Parrot]

I’ve voted Challinor but the L1 play-off final could be an audition. Loser gets the job!

[Lord Worcester]

Me too

So did I. Why is it wasted?

[Porth Pouncer]

I can’t see the poll but I’d go Ramsey ONLY IF we have a director of football

[the other bob wilson]

I think the fact Buckingham hasn’t got a vote yet shows the strength of the field open to City - always assuming they’d be willing to work for Tan. Five of the candidates are out of work and I’d be happy with all of them bar Beale - will City go for the best option or will it be the cheapest one yet again?

[the other bob wilson]

So did I. Why is it wasted?

Don’t think there’s a chance of him coming here - he could well see it as a downward move and I’d say we’d have to wait until mid June at the earliest for him to arrive here, which seems too long to wait for me.

[Lord Worcester]

Don’t think there’s a chance of him coming here - he could well see it as a downward move and I’d say we’d have to wait until mid June at the earliest for him to arrive here, which seems too long to wait for me.

I’m sort of hoping the delay is down to the fact that they are waiting for the loser of jones v wellens. I’d take either. Or I’d be happy with challinor.

[Undercoverinwurzelland]

Not going to be Beale (or Gerrard) according to BBC.

[Armitage Shanks]

These polls shows how little this site is used by the small numbers that voted in a 24 hour period. Back in days of youn' there would have been many more votes