Not sure where the first comment comes from. It's a forum, people respond and respond in kind.
You have set a specific determinant there of how all political discussions should be based - by the number of MPs. I agree that's definitely part of the equation but far from the only one. If that were the case it's a recipe for the media parroting whoever is in power.
On that basis, yes Reform get a disproportionate hearing. So do the SNP and Plaid UK wide, so do that Lib Dems I suspect as they are typically on most panels.
As for Question Time, I see three Reform MPs have been on this year, to eight Lib Dems. You can add in Zia Yusufs appearances and it's 5 to 8. So you aren't right on that one. So that's 5 out of 96 panellists in 2025.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List..._Time_episodes
I don't have the data for other panellist shows such as the Daily Politics but I suspect they are the same.
Is that fair? It's an over-epresentation in terms of MPs. It's a total underrepresentation based on the last local elections and an underrepresentation based on opinion polls.
So on balance, I reckon they probably get it about right really.
But either way, the idea the BBC ever give wall-to-wall coverage to council ward by-elections is absolutely untrue.