+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Strangely he failed to respond to my comment on two of reforms ideas, whether they become reality, who knows, but let’s face it, do Labour ever stick to what they say they will do in their manifestos? Yeah rightio. I guess not paying tax until you earn 20k would have no bearing on him, you would think he might care more about the legions of uk poor and homeless though rather than sorting out the problems of other foreign countries first? Weird
It is interesting to see the Reform 'promises' unravel now they have control over a few councils (9 is it?) and also have Andrea Jenkyns as mayor of Greater Lincolnshire. Kent is their flagship and they are in meltdown. The 'big savings' they were going to make by sacking equalities staff have not happened - because there weren't any equalities staff. After 14-15 years of austerity there is no low hanging fruit even for fans of DOGE, inequality and carbon emissions. Snake oil salesmen!
The 'no income tax below £20k' promise has already gone. It is now 'aspirational'. It may happen after a Reform government has sacked all the civil servants. However, the tax break pledge for the super rich is still in place. The imaginary Reform savings have been spent 4 or 5 times over already - so none of it stacks up even if the 'savings' were real.
I know all the parties make false promises - but Reforms have been more dishonest than the norm.
So what is left? Stop immigrants. End net zero. 'War on woke'. Law and order (more police, harsher sentences, more gaols, end the court backlog - all funded by sacking civil servants!). Flag shagging!
Much more into this kind of post than all the mud slinging and name calling.
It's absolutely fair enough to hold Reform councils to account. My general opinion is that they will do marginally better than others, if that. The big changes that impact spending come from higher up and it's very difficult to find huge savings in statutory areas, as councils have to deliver them.
There are savings to be made, but they take time, and obviously six months operating on the previous administrations budget is not long enough to turn things around, if that is possible at all.
The diversity stuff is a valid enough criticism but there's previously little money to be saved. At the most you are probably talking about 0.5 members of staff. Sure, all staff doing online courses takes a little time, perhaps an hour or two out of a year, but there's no real direct savings to be made. I do think things should be fundamentally refocused though to focus on what unites us rather than what divides, but again, no real or immediate savings there.