Quote Originally Posted by William Treseder View Post
What has all that got to do with trying to defend a guy that you know yourself is guilty?
If Chauvins defence could have somehow got him off with some kind of miraculous technicality, they would have, and wouldn’t have blinked an eye at letting a guilty man walk.
As i said, everyone is entitled to a defence, but you’ve got to have some teal thick skin to try to defend the indefensible, in a court of law.
But without a defence lawyer we are assuming everyone is guilty
So what's the point in going to court
Should we become a lynchmob society?