Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS

[Elwood Blues]

I'm not saying for a second that the figures are accurate, truthful or real. I do hope they are though. As for Tories defending her because they voted for them, nah, that's not the case, it isn't blind loyalty, that can be understood to a certain degree. They defend because they think it's ok to commit a bit of fraud at the expense of the public. Look how old boris has behaved, shagger, liar, incompetent, abandons his kids etc. It's an odd one, that's for sure-Could you imagine those behavior traits if that was some working class bloke on benefits? I'm sure he wouldn't receive the backing of the Daily Mail or of the millions of Tories up and down the nation, or even Elwood Blues

Having just seen the last bit referring to me I am actually quite angry at this.

You are,in the bit in bold, (which is the hell of an over exaggeration about all conservative voter anyway) insinuating that I am dishonest basically because you still seem to feel that I am defending the Tories here and don't try and defend yourself by saying 'Oh I put on a laughter emoji' There are times when that excuse doesn't wash.

As I said if you can be bothered to read my post I said

'If there has been fraud and the audit office find it then Priti Patel or whoever in her office has done it should be in trouble.'

So if she has committed fraud she should be for it. But not on the basis of assumptions by the Twitteratti.



And I thought you were a pretty decent poster even though we have different views in politics.

Not as good a judge of character as I thought.

[Tuerto]

Having just seen the last bit referring to me I am actually quite angry at this.

You are,in the bit in bold, (which is the hell of an over exaggeration about all conservative voter anyway) insinuating that I am dishonest basically because you still seem to feel that I am defending the Tories here and don't try and defend yourself by saying 'Oh I put on a laughter emoji' There are times when that excuse doesn't wash.

As I said if you can be bothered to read my post I said

'If there has been fraud and the audit office find it then Priti Patel or whoever in her office has done it should be in trouble.'

So if she has committed fraud she should be for it. But not on the basis of assumptions by the Twitteratti.



And I thought you were a pretty decent poster even though we have different views in politics.

Not as good a judge of character as I thought.

Kin'ell, hold your horses. I didn't even know that you voted Tory. I have said that i have no idea if any of this stuff is true, although i hope it is, if it nails Patel, although she'll get some more consultancy work on the back of it

I do believe that plenty of Tory voters are bent, corrupt, out to line their own pocket etc. I never one said that you were that way inclined, so accept my apologies if you thought that i was implicating you as someone who is bent rotten Tory. I don't think you are.