Yellow card for quoting a long post then adding one sentence.
Alternative thoughts on Rjk's post:
Tomlin - £3million on a player who Warnock was never going to use as a starter. We got to see him as good value under Harris but you shouldn't spend such a great percentage of that year's transfer budget on a bench option.
Decordova Reid - good on paper but for another club not ours. Again a high percentage of total transfer budget on a player who Warnock saw as a bench option at best - this only changed in Man United game and by then player was asking agent to force a move.
Both of these signings suggest Warnock was looking to add a dimension to his side without understanding what sort of skillful player could fit into what he wanted to do.
Vaulks - I don't think £2million was that high as a fee in that season and not a huge percentage of overall spend. But if you can take a gamble on spending £2million we gambled too many times and only Vaulks has come close to being worth it so far.
I liked the Sanderson loan move.
Ojo - I remember someone saying 7 assists and 4 goals was a good output and hard to replace but now he's "meh"
Overall, I'm not sure if the club has read articles saying go for younger and more skillful players and is getting lucky or whether the right sort of younger and more skillful players are being identified. Too early to say but I find some of the criticism of the club's actions stuck in the past.