+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?
Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.
If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!
Q If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
A. Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!
Four years of the Politics Board Redux!
The thing about voting is that it is all about mechanics or procedures, not political views. You just have to point out why the current US system of validating postal votes by checking the person against the electoral roll of registered voters and their previously supplied signature is wide open to fraud because " boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot."
It's got shit all to do with long games just you being unable to substantiate a statement that the US election is fatally flawed because of registered and unregistered votes.
Clue...the answer has nothing to do with Mueller, Russia, Steele, Antifa et al. Just you talking bollocks and being unable to justify a scintilla of it to anyone, (except LoM and RogersBlue of course). Sometimes it's just as well that you are "blessed" with your level of self-awareness.
"No one will be checking"
Our resident US expert doesn't know that the two parties are entitled to have people watching each postal vote being opened and challenging it. A successful challenge means the vote is binned.
The republicans are advertising frantically for watchers, knowing that each postal vote that is excluded is more likely to be a vote for the opposition than them.
It'll come as a huge surprise to us all, but gluey is talking total rubbish. "No one will be checking" - they will be checked and challenged more closely than ever.
Who the feck would come up with this as an answer before saying that the fraud problem with mail in ballots, wasn't a fraud problem at all just the time you need in a Covid crisis to count them allWhen requesting an absentee voting ballet you have to provide details of who you are and it can only be used by the applicant. With the bulk mail-in scam, hundreds of millions of ballots are sent out to all and sundry including the the dead and previous occupants, etc, so people can just fill them in and vote multiple times. Boxes of these ballots have been turning up in empty buildings and underneath people's hedges. The Dems can't win without cheating, and having the media publish their daily lies