| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Not to mention the illegal FISA warrants used to spy on political opponents. It's almost as if people are getting their news from entirely different sources with so many polarised views on displayOriginally Posted by Mrs Steve R
Sounds about right for a war mongering scumbag who bombed 7 nations and became the first in U.S. history to be at war every single day of his eight year administration.
Not to mention the illegal FISA warrants used to spy on political opponents. It's almost as if people are getting their news from entirely different sources
Surely, war mongers start wars. Not try to end them.
Sounds about right for a war mongering scumbag who bombed 7 nations and became the first in U.S. history to be at war every single day of his eight year administration.
Or fund them.
What exactly is she guilty of in regards to Benghazi? The Republicans have had a couple of senate/congressional investigations now, and haven't found her guilty of anything as far as I'm aware. All the hate towards Clinton was/is due to the bullshit thrown at her over a couple of decades by the right.
Agreed. Loads of hate towards Clinton but no substance to back it up.
This.
There's no real real reason (relative to all other politicians) to dislike her. It's all a big con.
The only thing she's guilty of is being moderate.
The whole political system is corrupt, thank god we have a shining light and beacon of hope to look up too! We need to restore honesty in politics, Hillary for POTUS 2020!
I think Clinton would have been a half decent President. But her inability to deal with criticisms aimed at her in a convincing manner made her look cold and uncaring to the American people.....Still can't believe that they voted for Trump though.
State department that Clinton had control of at the time denied requests for additional security at the Embassy.
Maybe people hate Clinton because she's a bs artist. Husband **** around with interns? Hey, never mind divorcing the bum, carry on with a sham marriage because that feeds into your own political machinations.
Hillary rode the sentiment of the democrats, "hey, we've had a black president, now let's have a female one".
Any competent democratic candidate would have won against Trump. Sadly, it was Hillary running.
One thing you can say about the Democrats is they have very good gatekeepers, and they have completely coopted the DC political machine. Their holdovers are still running or disrupting most government departments and law enforcement/intel agencies. Working hand-in-hand with the MSM and high profile media personalities, they are still a formidable force when it comes to manipulating public opinion.
Then how come trump is president? How come 32 states out of 50 have a republican controlled house AND senate. How come 34 out of 50 states have Republican governors? Why do all the poorest states vote Republican? Why do so many people believe the "MSM" make up stories about Trump? Who do you think made "MSM" a thing? It wasn't the Democratic Party. The Republican party's distraction and manipulation tactics are so effective people don't even know they're being manipulated.
He may be president, but he does not have full control over all of the political machinary. He also has to deal with the RINO's in his own party. The wisest move he made was appointing a few top generals to his inner-circle, otherwise he would have been out already!
It was truly a battle of the pussy grabbers
You likened the election to a popularity contest, highlighted she lost to trump and described her as "shit" which is usually a comment on her capability rather than her performance. In turn I suggested she is dislikeable but trump, the other competitor, is a worse leader in terms of capability.
I'm not saying you support trump (nothing in your post to say that) but my post isn't unrelated to your starting comment. I just extended the points we were discussing slightly.
OK, you (understandably) seem to have lost your enthusiasm for this thread so here's a list of Conservative Review's top 10 Republicans In Name Only, their length of service to the Republican Party and the percentage of times they vote along Trump lines.
1. John McCain. Senator from AZ. 30 years - 83.3%
2. Lisa Murkowski. Senator from AK. 14 years - 85.7%
3. Susan Collins. Senator from ME. 20 years - 80%
4. Mitch McConnell. Senator from K. 32 years - 95.9%
5. Orrin Hatch. Senator from UT. 40 years - 96%
6. Lamar Alexander. Senator from TN. 14 years - 93.8%
7. Lindsey Graham. Senator from SC. 14 years - 90%
8. Jeff Flake. Senator from AZ. 4 years - 91.7%
9. Paul Ryan. Representative from WI. 18 years - 100%
10. Kevin McCarthy. Representative from CA. 10 years - 97.9%
Sources: fivethirtyeight.com, conservativereview.com
BTW this looks like a list of leading RINO's (his words not mine) that Steve Bannon is going to challenge at the 2018 & 2020 Republican Primaries.
You can cross number 8 off your list. He was going to be primaried by Steve Bannon, so he's decided to jump before he is pushed.
TBF there isn't much difference between Clinton, Bush and Obama, they are pretty much the same party, just like Blair and Cameron were. Everything run smoothly when new players take over. When people like Trump and Corbyn threaten the established power, things tend to get a little hostile, with attacks happening even within their own parties.
You're now off point. And waffling.
If you say so
GOP Rep. Ron DeSantis revealed Republican leadership blocked him and others from investigating the Clinton-Uranium One deal!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017...vidence-video/
That's the other thread. Get it together.If you say so
GOP Rep. Ron DeSantis revealed Republican leadership blocked him and others from investigating the Clinton-Uranium One deal!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017...vidence-video/
We were talking about how you've been manipulated by your media outlet of choice into invoking terms like RINO without even bothering to check facts. Remember?
Don’t waste your breath. He won’t respond about this. It’s what he does. He posts endlessly about his agenda to show how much cleverer than everyone else he is.. Then when someone tries to get him to commit to something or tie him down to a factual argument he has two methods - either go off on a tangent or revert to “I’m just an observer, let’s wait and see how things play out”
Basically he hasn’t got a clue.
I posted it here because it reinforces my opinion that there is very little difference when it comes down to the core actions of both main parties. The GOP leadership actually told their fellow Republicans to stop investigating the Uranium One deal and any Democrat wrongdoing! Why would they do that? It's going against the people when they involve themselves in the cover-up.
A real page in hilarys book
https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeAnarc...hildrens_book/
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
