Wales-Bales and his opponents

[NYCBlue]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

It wasn't my claim, it was the parents as reported the The Sun. It is still indeterminate for me along with many other things.

The word "pervert" wasn't used in the link to the Sun you posted. So I was just wondering what further data points you were able to identify before using it in your thread title. Also, why post at all about something so salacious if the only evidence you have is indeterminate?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

The word "pervert" wasn't used in the link to the Sun you posted. So I was just wondering what further data points you were able to identify before using it in your thread title. Also, why post at all about something so salacious if the only evidence you have is indeterminate?

3 people at the BBC came out and said they weren't involved in the alleged behaviour with an underage minor, hence their statements implied in a very clear manner that they weren't perverted individuals, and furthermore I didn't post MY evidence, I posted a news report. Anyway case closed, you are just being silly now.

[NYCBlue]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

3 people at the BBC came out and said they weren't involved in the alleged behaviour with an underage minor, hence their statements implied in a very clear manner that they weren't perverted individuals, and furthermore I didn't post MY evidence, I posted a news report. Anyway case closed, you are just being silly now.

Wow. That is so weak I feel embarrassed for you. And you've come up with a lot of weak arguments recently.

You decided to create a thread and used the word "pervert" in the title after reading a Sun article which did not reference that word. YOU don't have any evidence. And you never will. You get all your news from other sources. Just like everyone else that isn't a journalist or a witness to actual events. What am I not getting here?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

Wow. That is so weak I feel embarrassed for you. And you've come up with a lot of weak arguments recently.

You decided to create a thread and used the word "pervert" in the title after reading a Sun article which did not reference that word. YOU don't have any evidence. And you never will. You get all your news from other sources. Just like everyone else that isn't a journalist or a witness to actual events. What am I not getting here?

I suggest you read the first post again, and like the OP said it's feckin boring, so go and find yourself a new hobby or something.

[BlueArmy 86]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

Ruins almost every thread. It's pointless posting about the subject matter, because the post just gets lost in the constant back and forth with Wales Bales.

It's even happened in this this thread! From the second post onward it's turned to an argument from other threads

[J R Hartley]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

3 people at the BBC came out and said they weren't involved in the alleged behaviour with an underage minor, hence their statements implied in a very clear manner that they weren't perverted individuals, and furthermore I didn't post MY evidence, I posted a news report. Anyway case closed, you are just being silly now.

Where are you getting 'underage minor' from?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

Where are you getting 'underage minor' from?

From the Sun who said the young person was 17 when it started.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents

Ruins almost every thread. It's pointless posting about the subject matter, because the post just gets lost in the constant back and forth with Wales Bales.

It's even happened in this this thread! From the second post onward it's turned to an argument from other threads

It's mad innit