If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Next match: Pre-season. Saturday, July 11th | FC Midtjylland (H) @ Cardiff City Stadium, 12:30pm -
All pre-season fixtures
It is of course good news. But it just means prices are rising more slowly, albeit now probably slower than wages.
Most of the wage settlements I have seen reported have been below inflation rises.
Benefits are certainly not keeping pace with the cost of living.
There was a 10.1% rise in April for most benefits but the effective rate of inflation for benefits recipients was much higher than that - with food, energy and housing costs way over the headline rate.
But this has also been accompanied by creeping benefits cuts, with much more to come.
So I presume someone who was on 40,000 a year and recently got a 10% pay rise should have only really a 6.8% pay rise. Or rather they would they be happy to take a pay cut to stay in line with inflation.... - that never seems to happen strangely enough.
So I presume someone who was on 40,000 a year and recently got a 10% pay rise should have only really a 6.8% pay rise. Or rather they would they be happy to take a pay cut to stay in line with inflation.... - that never seems to happen strangely enough.
It's like communicating with a rock, this has been explained to you in about 8 different threads 15 different times. Wage increases lag inflation significantly, nobody is getting an increase on the assumption of future inflation, they are playing catch up.
Take the past 2/3 years, almost nobody who earns 40k and hasn't taken on more responsibility will be better off now than if their wage had tracked inflation.
So I presume someone who was on 40,000 a year and recently got a 10% pay rise should have only really a 6.8% pay rise. Or rather they would they be happy to take a pay cut to stay in line with inflation.... - that never seems to happen strangely enough.
You have said this before. It is beyond embarrassing! Do you really not understand simple numbers?
Falling inflation still means rising costs - against a higher cost base that is baked into all future calculations.
Why would anyone be happy to take a pay cut whilst costs are still rising - even if rising slightly more slowly than they were before?
You never seem to grasp this fundamental point strangely enough!
So I presume someone who was on 40,000 a year and recently got a 10% pay rise should have only really a 6.8% pay rise. Or rather they would they be happy to take a pay cut to stay in line with inflation.... - that never seems to happen strangely enough.
Do you know many people who have had a 10 per cent wage rise this year? You’re getting embarrassing now, by arguing people should hand money back when their pay goes above inflation, you’re also surely arguing that they should get what they are entitled to when their pay is below the inflation level.
So I presume someone who was on 40,000 a year and recently got a 10% pay rise should have only really a 6.8% pay rise. Or rather they would they be happy to take a pay cut to stay in line with inflation.... - that never seems to happen strangely enough.
From thinking the Earth is flat, to not being to answer basic questions about climate change denial, to not understanding how inflation and wages work. The right have looked pretty dumb this week.
Comment