Russell Brand

[JamesWales]

Re: Russell Brand

One rule for you

One rule for everyone else

You have been roasted here

It's a thread about Russell Brand, not two people who are long dead.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Russell Brand

I don't know what you are talking about. I haven't said anything about brand that he hasn't already admitted to publicly. Flashing your cock to a women is a criminal offence, along with telling her that he is going to **** her. I haven't said anything about rape.

Being a sex pest isn't criminal

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Russell Brand

It's a thread about Russell Brand, not two people who are long dead.

That's no defence

[NYCBlue]

Re: Russell Brand

Can we close this thread? Russell ****ing Brand? Does anyone really think he is a good and genuine person? Why is EVERYTHING so political and divisive these days?

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Russell Brand

You accuse people of turning everything partisan, of tribal politics, then you post stuff like this 🙄

Irony on a base level

[Tuerto]

Re: Russell Brand

Being a sex pest isn't criminal

Sexual Harassment isn't a criminal offence i don't think, it comes under civil law. Indecent exposure is though.

[JamesWales]

Re: Russell Brand

That's no defence

I disagree with the vast majority of your views because they are as one eyed as my penis but I normally understand them at least. I have no idea what you are going on about here. But trust me, fawning articles about Russell Brand from the time he was committing alleged offences are more valuable to understanding who he influenced and was influenced by than you and others talking about Jimmy Savile.

Madness.

[Jordi Culé]

Re: Russell Brand

The motor head drummer not the fat darts player

Darts sex pest.

[Jordi Culé]

Re: Russell Brand

I disagree with the vast majority of your views because they are as one eyed as my penis but I normally understand them at least. I have no idea what you are going on about here. But trust me, fawning articles about Russell Brand from the time he was committing alleged offences are more valuable to understanding who he influenced and was influenced by than you and others talking about Jimmy Savile.

Madness.

You see no similarities between Savile and Brand then in relation how they both been alleged to be serial sexual abusers, both in the world of celebrity, both cosied up to political establishment (before Brand has converted to Ickeism) and it appears both individuals were given a level of protection through willfull ignorance?

You're the lad whose brought politics to this thread mind.

I'm playing your game by going off on tangents.

Your nuance to read past and current situations is blipping again buddy.

Let's be to the point, Brand only spoke for himself as he's an opinionated, self indulgent, narcissist who also has a superiority complex.

In other words a cuunt.

[JamesWales]

Re: Russell Brand

You see no similarities between Savile and Brand then in relation how they both been alleged to be serial sexual abusers, both in the world of celebrity, both cosied up to political establishment (before Brand has converted to Ickeism) and it appears both individuals were given a level of protection through willfull ignorance?

You're the lad whose brought politics to this thread mind.

I'm playing your game by going off on tangents.

Your nuance to read past and current situations is blipping again buddy.

Let's be to the point, Brand only spoke for himself as he's an opinionated, self indulgent, narcissist who also has a superiority complex.

In other words a cuunt.

It does need to be reiterated that one has been charged, the other not, but yes I do think there are similiaries in terms of how people who are an 'open secret' can avoid being exposed and the support networks they build up around themselves are key to that

But no, within that principle I don't think there are similiarities really. And to jump to some story about Savile from 40 odd years ago doesn't suggest you take this story as seriously as you did that Rubiales kiss for example.

In looking at how he "got away with it" I think it is important to see who was courting, emboldening, justifying him etc at the time.

That's not unreasonable, in fact it's sensible.

I agree with you on the narcissistic personality etc but if everyone did know what was going on, it's fair to ask who kept feeding the ego and giving him more effective power.

[Dorcus]

Re: Russell Brand

You see no similarities between Savile and Brand then in relation how they both been alleged to be serial sexual abusers, both in the world of celebrity, both cosied up to political establishment (before Brand has converted to Ickeism) and it appears both individuals were given a level of protection through willfull ignorance?

You're the lad whose brought politics to this thread mind.

I'm playing your game by going off on tangents.

Your nuance to read past and current situations is blipping again buddy.

Let's be to the point, Brand only spoke for himself as he's an opinionated, self indulgent, narcissist who also has a superiority complex.

In other words a cuunt.

And in any case Saville was a Thatcher Luvvie; it shows she had great taste and perspicacity.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Russell Brand

Darts sex pest.

Is the darts player known as Phil filthy Taylor ?

[Jordi Culé]

Re: Russell Brand

Is the darts player known as Phil filthy Taylor ?

If he had been known as Phil 'The Filthy' Taylor instead of 'The Power' I would have fully endorsed it.

[Jordi Culé]

Re: Russell Brand

It does need to be reiterated that one has been charged, the other not, but yes I do think there are similiaries in terms of how people who are an 'open secret' can avoid being exposed and the support networks they build up around themselves are key to that

But no, within that principle I don't think there are similiarities really. And to jump to some story about Savile from 40 odd years ago doesn't suggest you take this story as seriously as you did that Rubiales kiss for example.

In looking at how he "got away with it" I think it is important to see who was courting, emboldening, justifying him etc at the time.

That's not unreasonable, in fact it's sensible.

I agree with you on the narcissistic personality etc but if everyone did know what was going on, it's fair to ask who kept feeding the ego and giving him more effective power.

I maybe wrong here but Savile is mentioned in the first post of this thread.

Admittedly, it's a tenuous link and I'm deliberately going 'off road' but I'm following your lead here buddy by going down the political road. It appears that the 40 years between Savile and Brand with an abundance of rumours, tales and informal accusations that surrounded the two individuals have taught some in politics nothing.

My observation.

Glad you recognise there are some similarities such as an abuse of position and who the two individuals were copying up with.

Rubiales kiss? I've said my bit on that and stand by it. Spanish courts still looking at it with sexual assault and coercion being considered?

Sounds like fuuck all to me and a fuss about fuuck all.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Russell Brand

It does need to be reiterated that one has been charged, the other not, but yes I do think there are similiaries in terms of how people who are an 'open secret' can avoid being exposed and the support networks they build up around themselves are key to that

But no, within that principle I don't think there are similiarities really. And to jump to some story about Savile from 40 odd years ago doesn't suggest you take this story as seriously as you did that Rubiales kiss for example.

In looking at how he "got away with it" I think it is important to see who was courting, emboldening, justifying him etc at the time.

That's not unreasonable, in fact it's sensible.

I agree with you on the narcissistic personality etc but if everyone did know what was going on, it's fair to ask who kept feeding the ego and giving him more effective power.

Which one out of Savile and Brand has been charged with anything?