Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Following the science -

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Following the science -



    Patrick Vallance, "Matt Hancock had a habit of saying things he didn't have a basis for. He would say things to enthusiastically, too early. Without the evidence to back them up. Then have to backtrack from them days later" Andrew O’Connor, "Matt Hancock said things that weren't https://t.co/ywbXWmngaA


    So obvious at the time to some

    Sir Patrick Vallance; He had a habit of saying things which he didn't have a basis for..

    AO: He said things that weren't true?

    PV: Yes

  • #2
    Re: Following the science -

    Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post


    Patrick Vallance, "Matt Hancock had a habit of saying things he didn't have a basis for. He would say things to enthusiastically, too early. Without the evidence to back them up. Then have to backtrack from them days later" Andrew O’Connor, "Matt Hancock said things that weren't https://t.co/ywbXWmngaA


    So obvious at the time to some

    Sir Patrick Vallance; He had a habit of saying things which he didn't have a basis for..

    AO: He said things that weren't true?

    PV: Yes
    Matt Hancock is a Liar Shock, Horror....

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Following the science -

      Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
      Matt Hancock is a Liar Shock, Horror....
      Why would he need to lie ? I wonder what’s to hide, if he lied is there any wonder why significant numbers of the public were sceptical?

      Self appointed government deputies must be cringing.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Following the science -

        Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
        Why would he need to lie ? I wonder what’s to hide, if he lied is there any wonder why significant numbers of the public were sceptical?

        Self appointed government deputies must be cringing.
        Well, seeing as it's the Governments chief Scientist saying this about Hancock, and agreeing with him, aren't we 'Following the Science"?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Following the science -

          Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
          Well, seeing as it's the Governments chief Scientist saying this about Hancock, and agreeing with him, aren't we 'Following the Science"?
          Not really as he’s been not following the science either


          So he believed in 'Herd Immunity' the week before he forgot that? #covidinquiryUK


          It’s almost as if they all were at some point in time.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Following the science -

            Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
            Not really as he’s been not following the science either


            So he believed in 'Herd Immunity' the week before he forgot that? #covidinquiryUK


            It’s almost as if they all were at some point in time.
            I'm confused, I assume that clip is from early March 2020 when, for a short while, the UK was following the herd immunity line and then , within a day or two, it all changed because of Ferguson's modelling which showed half a million could die. Are you saying that they were wrong to push the herd immunity line and then wrong to change their minds about it?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Following the science -

              sage was all for this herd immunity thing also- so they must of also thought the modelling was wildly inaccurate, especially when you take into account the other modelling undertakings in respect of the effects of lockdowns on the population- which we are seeing now which the significant spike in excess deaths, particularly in people under 50.

              13 March 2020: @tomaspueyo reacts when Sage member Jon Edmunds' insists that "herd immunity" with hundreds of thousands of UK deaths had become the only viable response to Covid-19 and that "containment hasn't worked in the UK". #C4News @mattfrei https://t.co/1CrvTZvWOu https://t.co/LrCxpRi07T

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Following the science -

                Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                sage was all for this herd immunity thing also- so they must of also thought the modelling was wildly inaccurate, especially when you take into account the other modelling undertakings in respect of the effects of lockdowns on the population- which we are seeing now which the significant spike in excess deaths, particularly in people under 50.

                https://x.com/ian_fraser/status/1397...LhmySD2aRt-GNg
                I'm not sure that clip confirms that SAGE, as a body, were ever in favour of herd immunity, it would be news to me if they were. My recollection is that, as shown by the video you linked, Valance, and maybe Whitty, spoke in favour of herd immunity for a short period of possibly as little as two or three days before a decision was made that the number of deaths, as predicted by modelling, was too high and another approach was required. The situation was so fast moving that I'm not sure SAGE would have been able to convene a meeting where all members could agree with what Valance and others were saying for that very short period before the herd mentality approach was abandoned.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Following the science -

                  Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                  I'm not sure that clip confirms that SAGE, as a body, were ever in favour of herd immunity, it would be news to me if they were. My recollection is that, as shown by the video you linked, Valance, and maybe Whitty, spoke in favour of herd immunity for a short period of possibly as little as two or three days before a decision was made that the number of deaths, as predicted by modelling, was too high and another approach was required. The situation was so fast moving that I'm not sure SAGE would have been able to convene a meeting where all members could agree with what Valance and others were saying for that very short period before the herd mentality approach was abandoned.
                  It wasn’t fast moving , from about two weeks in it was obvious a “case demic” and it was also obvious that the PCR test was set too high which resulted in common symptoms being incorrectly identified as Covid.

                  Furthermore the PM knew in 2020 (prior to any vaccination rollout) that the average age of a Covid death was higher than the average death rate.

                  That is probably why Ferguson and Cummings broke the rules very early in to the pandemic and why many people didn’t fall for the “scare the pants off them” narrative.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Following the science -

                    Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                    It wasn’t fast moving , from about two weeks in it was obvious a “case demic” and it was also obvious that the PCR test was set too high which resulted in common symptoms being incorrectly identified as Covid.

                    Furthermore the PM knew in 2020 (prior to any vaccination rollout) that the average age of a Covid death was higher than the average death rate.

                    That is probably why Ferguson and Cummings broke the rules very early in to the pandemic and why many people didn’t fall for the “scare the pants off them” narrative.
                    If only you had been posting this "obvious" stuff at the time I guess you might have talked some people out of their groupthink. We had to make do with WalesBales spouting nonsense and then contradicting himself every week or so until he took a year's sabbatical.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Following the science -

                      Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                      Why would he need to lie ? I wonder what’s to hide, if he lied is there any wonder why significant numbers of the public were sceptical?

                      Self appointed government deputies must be cringing.
                      Who appoints themself as a government deputy?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Following the science -

                        Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                        It wasn’t fast moving , from about two weeks in it was obvious a “case demic” and it was also obvious that the PCR test was set too high which resulted in common symptoms being incorrectly identified as Covid.

                        Furthermore the PM knew in 2020 (prior to any vaccination rollout) that the average age of a Covid death was higher than the average death rate.

                        That is probably why Ferguson and Cummings broke the rules very early in to the pandemic and why many people didn’t fall for the “scare the pants off them” narrative.
                        The very fact the top Government scientists were saying one thing one day and something completely different a couple of days later proves that the situation was fast moving. I guarantee you were thinking something completely different in early March 2020 than you do now.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Following the science -

                          Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                          The very fact the top Government scientists were saying one thing one day and something completely different a couple of days later proves that the situation was fast moving. I guarantee you were thinking something completely different in early March 2020 than you do now.
                          I feel the same now as then , give or take a week or so after it first started, especially when I had Covid symptoms in the November prior to the first lockdown, which suggested it was prevalent much sooner.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Following the science -

                            Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                            I feel the same now as then , give or take a week or so after it first started, especially when I had Covid symptoms in the November prior to the first lockdown, which suggested it was prevalent much sooner.
                            I’m sure you weren’t.

                            You and others say it’s no different to flu and yet you’re saying you had it a couple of months before it’s supposed to have arrived in this country, isn’t it more likely you just had the flu?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Following the science -

                              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                              I’m sure you weren’t.

                              You and others say it’s no different to flu and yet you’re saying you had it a couple of months before it’s supposed to have arrived in this country, isn’t it more likely you just had the flu?
                              Not only had it but bravely made it into work every day so it could spread around it seems!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X