Epstein.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Epstein.

His advisors must be tearing their hair out or is he playing four dimensional chess again?

TOS666.jpg

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Epstein.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]6630[/ATTACH]

All of which should mean that they should have got him in 2016 then (actually they should have done so long before that).

[lardy]

Re: Epstein.

They can't seem to shut his mouth as he thinks he is his best defence lawyer (spoiler alert...it's the Supreme Court).

But stating he fell out with Epstein, not because he knew he was a peadophile. but because he "persuaded" children who were working in the Mar-A-Lago spa to leave his employment to go into his custody, not once but twice is off the scale.

Why would a 'billionaire' care about losing some minimum wage employees in a tiny part of his business 'empire', let alone remember it 20 years later? Unless they were more than just that...

Trump will never face justice for his crimes, so in a way this doesn't matter. But it does make those who defend him - whether its the Supreme Court, Congress, or the most simple internet users - look even worse for continuing to passionately stand by and defend a man who clearly had sex with many underage girls against their will.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: Epstein.

Ha, I honestly don't follow the threads where you guys discuss the in depth religious stuff! Whenever I flick over it always seems to be TBG in various states of exasperation 🤣

There are two posters on this board (and one is on this thread) that are not worth engaging with as they deliberately lie to misrepresent one's views and can't evidence those lies when asked to.
I try not to respond to either these days.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Epstein.

Why would a 'billionaire' care about losing some minimum wage employees in a tiny part of his business 'empire', let alone remember it 20 years later? Unless they were more than just that...

Trump will never face justice for his crimes, so in a way this doesn't matter. But it does make those who defend him - whether its the Supreme Court, Congress, or the most simple internet users - look even worse for continuing to passionately stand by and defend a man who clearly had sex with many underage girls against their will.

The most simple internet users are the ones who fell for the obvious Russia collusion hoax! :hehe:

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Epstein.

There are two posters on this board (and one is on this thread) that are not worth engaging with as they deliberately lie to misrepresent one's views and can't evidence those lies when asked to.
I try not to respond to either these days.

Let me know who they are so I can avoid them too!

[jon1959]

Re: Epstein.

The most simple internet users are the ones who fell for the obvious 'Russia collusion hoax' hoax! :hehe:

Corrected for you! :hehe:

[lardy]

Re: Epstein.

DOJ political appointee is going to see Ghislaine for an emergency meeting. She desperately wants to get out. I wonder if she will:

a) heavily and accurately implicate Trump and meet the same end as Jeff; or

b) exonerate Trump and find her sentence commuted in a few months.

Who knows what will happen!

Goodness me, she's been moved to a minimum security prison, I just can't believe it.

[lardy]

Re: Epstein.

It just gets more and more surprising!

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ghislaine-maxwell-trump-epstein-files-todd-blanche-b2802917.html

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Epstein.

It just gets more and more surprising!

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2802917.html

That must be such a relief......I mean what's in it for her?

[Tuerto]

Re: Epstein.

Goodness me, she's been moved to a minimum security prison, I just can't believe it.

I wonder how her appeal will go........

[Dorcus]

Re: Epstein.

I wonder how her appeal will go........

President Trump would never allow an innocent woman to remain incarcerated. He has a unique sense of justice!

[JamesWales]

Re: Epstein.

Can't see how Mandelson will survive this. If he was in any way friendly with Epstein, then given what's come out about him, I think his position seems unteneble.

Badenoch is poor at PMQs normally but she clearly won today and it was on this topic and Starmer was squirming. It's a dreadful look when it's child sexual abuse being talked about, as opposed to sleaze or tax issues etc.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/36653596/jeffrey-epstein-lord-mandelson-coached-paedo/

[stevo]

Re: Epstein.

The real question is - will Trump survive this?

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Epstein.

Can't see how Mandelson will survive this. If he was in any way friendly with Epstein, then given what's come out about him, I think his position seems unteneble.

Badenoch is poor at PMQs normally but she clearly won today and it was on this topic and Starmer was squirming. It's a dreadful look when it's child sexual abuse being talked about, as opposed to sleaze or tax issues etc.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/366535...coached-paedo/

I hope its Starmers demise , hes pathetic

Too late for the tories though