Tucker Carlson

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Just like with Covid , ( when people questioned why they thought cutting fire doors in half for example was following the science) the Ukraine losses thread , and this new revelation, the pile ons are getting less and less by the day as the official narrative continues to be questioned. It was hard work at times but it’s always been the way to go with your best intuition.

What was the Ukraine losses again when the original thread was posted , , 100k wasn’t it, just like UVL stated ( and then retracted). Someone has suggested this figure is now close to 500k killed , missing or deserted.
Ukraine has also had a huge decrease in population with millions going into Russia and elsewhere.

Actually I wish the critical thinking few were wrong at times .

Or most sensible people have stopped bothering with you lot.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

The long game always beats critical thinking, ask Lardy & Cyril

[TWGL1]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Or most sensible people have stopped bothering with you lot.

Who cares what you think really , no offence, ultimately the pile ons are getting less and less for a reason and most of my friends are just like me, when they weren’t always like that.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Who cares what you think really , no offence, ultimately the pile ons are getting less and less for a reason and most of my friends are just like me, when they weren’t always like that.

[Canton Kev]

Re: Tucker Carlson

The are too many moving parts and this is just a part of it. What's the bigger picture? I don't think anyone can lay it all out just yet?

Didn’t you claim to have a timeline all mapped out?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Didn’t you claim to have a timeline all mapped out?

Several, but the moving parts add complexity, and a timeline by definition is always moving forward. Hence, at any given point in time the data is either true, false or indeterminant.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Who cares what you think really , no offence, ultimately the pile ons are getting less and less for a reason and most of my friends are just like me, when they weren’t always like that.

Exactly, sensible people are saying who cares what you lot think?

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Several, but the moving parts add complexity, and a timeline by definition is always moving forward. Hence, at any given point in time the data is either true, false or indeterminant.

Is that you admitting you’ve not got a clue what is happening?

[TWGL1]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Exactly, sensible people are saying who cares what you lot think?

And STILL you follow along the same path…… despite what’s now “permitted” to being reported. Mass formation psychosis is strong with you.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Exactly, sensible people are saying who cares what you lot think?

People were saying the same thing during the Russia collusion & Hunter's laptop fiasco, and how did that turn out? I will always back myself to be mostly right over time, and I have actually studied this sort of thing.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Is that you admitting you’ve not got a clue what is happening?

Exactly the opposite.

[NinianOpinion1927]

Re: Tucker Carlson

Lardy & Cyril got him banned, and they tried it with me too.

They're trying it with me too. Pathetic, and they claim to be the liberal "good guys"

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

They're trying it with me too. Pathetic, and they claim to be the liberal "good guys"

The "untouchables" are a pair of undereducated fools, and they would have been your typical teacher's pet at school

[MOZZER2]

Re: Tucker Carlson

The "untouchables" are a pair of undereducated fools, and they would have been your typical teacher's pet at school

sounds more like political interference or weaponizing the board where have i heard that before

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Tucker Carlson

sounds more like political interference or weaponizing the board where have i heard that before

The good news is they are not as rowdy as they once were, when they used to speak with the upmost authority on any given topic.