Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

phantom candidates

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: phantom candidates

    Originally posted by Packerman View Post
    Tbf Jon Russian collusion is the only sniff at a win he’s ever had. Rinse and repeat etc. ps don’t mention Chinese aircraft carriers
    Fair enough.

    I grant that he had a technical win on Russia collusion - in that there was insufficient evidence to bring a successful prosecution. But there is also a mountain of evidence of collaboration, co-operation (and other c words) and shared interests between Trump and Putin.

    But how that has any relevance to his latest brain fade on Reform candidates at election counts is a mystery. It is just a reflex. When in the shit have another pop at Cyril - who has had him on toast for at least the last 8 years!

    I think 'painful' is the kindest description.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: phantom candidates

      Originally posted by jon1959 View Post
      Fair enough.

      I grant that he had a technical win on Russia collusion - in that there was insufficient evidence to bring a successful prosecution. But there is also a mountain of evidence of collaboration, co-operation (and other c words) and shared interests between Trump and Putin.

      But how that has any relevance to his latest brain fade on Reform candidates at election counts is a mystery. It is just a reflex. When in the shit have another pop at Cyril - who has had him on toast for at least the last 8 years!

      I think 'painful' is the kindest description.
      Don't forget the Ballon d'Or winning conspiracy theory the great reset!

      Comment

      Working...
      X