Rachel Reeves

[Rjk]

Re: Rachel Reeves

I bet you're views were different when Boris had a Sausage roll on the way to his flat?

But you are correct storm in a teacup. But after all the fuss over the last few years from Boris onwards it will now continue forever, and people will lose their jobs over trivial issues, like calling someone an oaf on WhatsApp on a private chat with their mates

Didn't Boris Johnston get the heave-ho because he appointed Chris Pincher s a chief whip despite knowing that he was accused of groping men?

If anything the Johnson tory government had a much higher degree of brass neck than any of their predecessors - things that would have caused a resignation in the past were just ignored routinely by the that government.

[Dorcus]

Re: Rachel Reeves

I'm no fan of Reeves anyway, particularly after the unscrupulous slander job her and her ilk performed on Jeremy!

[Heathblue]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It's seems that all the solid radical lefties on here don't like their representative party 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.

[Dorcus]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It's seems that all the solid radical lefties on here don't like their representative party 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.

It's not our representative party that's why! It's been foisted on us by a right wing cabal! Very clever mind, how they manage to manipulate democracy!

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It's seems that all the solid radical lefties on here don't like their representative party 藍藍藍藍藍.

Implosion demolitions have always been fun to watch.

[Rjk]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It's seems that all the solid radical lefties on here don't like their representative party ����������.

still vastly preferable to the Tories or reform

[JamesWales]

Re: Rachel Reeves

still vastly preferable to the Tories or reform

Just out of interest, how are things better now than under the Tories? And I do understand they deserved to be kicked out, but im not sure anything has improved and some things have got worse,no?

[stevo]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It's seems that all the solid radical lefties on here don't like their representative party ����������.

That’s the difference though between the left and right on this message board. The lefties are happy to call out anyone when they see wrong but the right-wingers seems to defend their political heroes no matter what they do.

[JamesWales]

Re: Rachel Reeves

That’s the difference though between the left and right on this message board. The lefties are happy to call out anyone when they see wrong but the right-wingers seems to defend their political heroes no matter what they do.

I think the biggest difference is that some will only like or dislike something based on who the story is associated with.

A Tory Chancellor lying about working for the Bank of England would absolutely be a raging thread on here. Obama talking about peace in Ukraine would also be a very different story.

That's my observation anyway!

[Eric Cartman]

Re: Rachel Reeves

I think the biggest difference is that some will only like or dislike something based on who the story is associated with.

A Tory Chancellor lying about working for the Bank of England would absolutely be a raging thread on here. Obama talking about peace in Ukraine would also be a very different story.

That's my observation anyway!

It would be a potentially valid observation if your posting history wasn't littered with examples of you deflecting and whatabouting every time a new Tory scandal hit during their time in government.

Here is one about another former chancellor, slightly worse than reeves stretching the truth on social media imo, but maybe not in your estimation..

https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?456285-Nadhim-Zahawi-Tax-avoidance&highlight=Zahawi

The evidence seems to suggest:

Tory scandal - deflect, 'they are all at it'

Labour scandal - 'why would she lie, does she think lying as the chancellor is okay??'

People in glass houses and all that. Also just to preempt your 'its flattering that you would trawl through my post history teehee' response, it's like shooting fish in a barrel, took about 2 mins.

[JamesWales]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It would be a potentially valid observation if your posting history wasn't littered with examples of you deflecting and whatabouting every time a new Tory scandal hit during their time in government.

Here is one about another former chancellor, slightly worse than reeves stretching the truth on social media imo, but maybe not in your estimation..

https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?456285-Nadhim-Zahawi-Tax-avoidance&highlight=Zahawi

The evidence seems to suggest:

Tory scandal - deflect, 'they are all at it'

Labour scandal - 'why would she lie, does she think lying as the chancellor is okay??'

People in glass houses and all that. Also just to preempt your 'its flattering that you would trawl through my post history teehee' response, it's like shooting fish in a barrel, took about 2 mins.

I'm not sure your example really backs your point up and you didn't seem to take from it the thrust of what I was saying. From the first two pages of the same thread:

"This bunch really are the dregs of society." - Ninian Opinion

"Tosspots" -Sludge

"Tosspots" - Dorcus

"Parasite" - Ninian Opinion

"Pack of miscreants" - Claude Blue

"Duplicitous tosspots - AZ City

Note how common the insults are plural; using one person to damn a group of people. And note how abusive they are, which certainly included calls to resign.

There is no comparison with people's comments on Rachel Reeves, and as I say..if it was a story about a Tory chancellor lying about their role at the Bank of England we would be seeing the exact same language as above

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Rachel Reeves

I'm not sure your example really backs your point up and you didn't seem to take from it the thrust of what I was saying. From the first two pages of the same thread:

"This bunch really are the dregs of society." - Ninian Opinion

"Tosspots" -Sludge

"Tosspots" - Dorcus

"Parasite" - Ninian Opinion

"Pack of miscreants" - Claude Blue

"Duplicitous tosspots - AZ City

Note how common the insults are plural; using one person to damn a group of people. And note how abusive they are, which certainly included calls to resign.

There is no comparison with people's comments on Rachel Reeves, and as I say..if it was a story about a Tory chancellor lying about their role at the Bank of England we would be seeing the exact same language as above

It's incredibly surprising to see a right wing reform voter like you having a history of defending , making excuses for and propping up ......right wing politicians? 🤔

This has all come as an incredible shock 😲

What's happened ? !

It's so unlike you as I thought you were always so moderate , middle of the road ?

But all along ....

Well I never

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Rachel Reeves

Not into money laundering then.

That's very sharp

She needs to pledge and provide some conditioner

[JamesWales]

Re: Rachel Reeves

It's incredibly surprising to see a right wing reform voter like you having a history of defending , making excuses for and propping up ......right wing politicians? 🤔

This has all come as an incredible shock 😲

What's happened ? !

It's so unlike you as I thought you were always so moderate , middle of the road ?

But all along ....

Well I never

You should try reading threads before you post on them!

I did look for another thread to consider the way different people speak about different parties and that was the one where you said Esther Mcvey should be shot. Definitely one of the good guys!

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Rachel Reeves

You should try reading threads before you post on them!

I did look for another thread to consider the way different people speak about different parties and that was the one where you said Esther Mcvey should be shot. Definitely one of the good guys!

Yes , or sent to Greenland

Dreadful woman