The Donald Trump thread

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The last time you played in this space you came up with the novel concept of registered and unregistered ballots. Since when you have been unable to articulate what you mean.

Given that electoral fraud is not a made up story, what are Registered and Unregistered Mail-in ballots?

When requesting an absentee voting ballet you have to provide details of who you are and it can only be used by the applicant. With the bulk mail-in scam, hundreds of millions of ballots are sent out to all and sundry including the the dead and previous occupants, etc, so people can just fill them in and vote multiple times. Boxes of these ballots have been turning up in empty buildings and underneath people's hedges. The Dems can't win without cheating, and having the media publish their daily lies

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

When requesting an absentee voting ballet you have to provide details of who you are and it can only be used by the applicant. With the bulk mail-in scam, hundreds of millions of ballots are sent out to all and sundry including the the dead and previous occupants, etc, so people can just fill them in and vote multiple times. Boxes of these ballots have been turning up in empty buildings and underneath people's hedges. The Dem's can't win without cheating, and having the media publish their daily lies

Very interesting. But you were slapping down TBG about not knowing the difference between registered and unregistered mail in ballots. What are they ?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The 'election fraud' claims made by Trump after the 2016 election were a totally 'made up story' - peddled by a narcissist and serial liar to 'explain' to his credulous fans how he lost the popular vote by 3 million.

When you run the 100 metres you train for a sprint, and when you run the 10,000 metres you train for a marathon

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

You said voting by post is no less respectable than voting in person, so I just pointed out that there are two types of postal voting, verified and unverified, so all things are not equally respectable!

bump. Apologies you said that the two different types of postal voting were verified and unverified rather than registered and unregistered. In case you don't embarrass me further what's the difference between verified and unverified postal voting?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Very interesting. But you were slapping down TBG about not knowing the difference between registered and unregistered mail in ballots. What are they ?

Well, your name is registered in the system when you apply for an absentee ballot. On the other hand, anybody "finding" a box or three of the bulk mail-in ballots can fill them all in, and vote for their preferred candidate hundreds or thousands of times.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Well, your name is registered in the system when you apply for an absentee ballot. On the other hand, anybody "finding" a box or three of the bulk mail-in ballots can fill them all in, and vote for their preferred candidate hundreds or thousands of times.

What, You don't have to be a registered voter? Just to be clear is that what you are saying?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

What, You don't have to be a registered voter? Just to be clear is that what you are saying?

The voter rolls are not accurate and it's easy to game the system, and that is why the Democrats spoke out against bulk mail-in voting prior to Trump coming on the scene.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The voter rolls are not accurate and it's easy to game the system, and that is why the Democrats spoke out against bulk mail-in voting prior to Trump coming on the scene.

So what you are saying is that there are shitloads of phantom voters on the the system and that is the big problem, rather than what Donald Trump is saying which is that the system is so flawed that a registered voter can vote via ballot and then in person. Is that what you are trying to say when you stated that anybody "finding" a box or three of the bulk mail-in ballots can fill them all in, and vote for their preferred candidate hundreds or thousands of times.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

So what you are saying is that there are shitloads of phantom voters on the the system and that is the big problem, rather than what Donald Trump is saying which is that the system is so flawed that a registered voter can vote via ballot and then in person. Is that what you are trying to say when you stated that anybody "finding" a box or three of the bulk mail-in ballots can fill them all in, and vote for their preferred candidate hundreds or thousands of times.

Yep, it's a mess, and totally open to fraud. Just imagine if so many dodgy ballots turned up in the system, that they are unable to declare a winner. What happens then?

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Yep, it's a mess, and totally open to fraud. Just imagine if so many dodgy ballots turned up in the system, that they are unable to declare a winner. What happens then?

Gosh... and this has only happened in the last three years after 250 years of elections that were considered true and fair.

That aside. Talk us through the process where in any US election anybody "finding" a box or three of the bulk mail-in ballots can fill them all in, and vote for their preferred candidate hundreds or thousands of times.

And after your amazing assertion,these votes could count!

Now when you try to avoid generalisation or evasion and spell it out in factual terms. Or do your Cyril and Lardy gig. Otherwise you might just look a bit of a prat!

[jon1959]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Otherwise?

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Gosh... and this has only happened in the last three years after 250 years of elections that were considered true and fair.

That aside. Talk us through the process where in any US election anybody "finding" a box or three of the bulk mail-in ballots can fill them all in, and vote for their preferred candidate hundreds or thousands of times.

And after your amazing assertion,these votes could count!

Now when you try to avoid generalisation or evasion and spell it out in factual terms. Or do your Cyril and Lardy gig. Otherwise you might just look a bit of a prat!

It's quite simple Cyril. When they find the box of blank ballots in the hedge, they just need to go to the next hedge and they'll find the electoral roll with a list of names and signatures. Then it's a straightforward case of copying hundreds of thousands of signatures accurately.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Who told Fox News that if voting was easier and turnout went up, “you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again”?

Why, it was the current President of the United States of course - this article will be dismissed by the Trump fan boys on here as irrelevant because it is from the Guardian, but, like the quote above, the article has links showing that many of the claims contained in it have come from his own lips.

As asked before, what makes people support this charlatan and coward?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/04/trump-democracy-voting-process-elected

I see it's being reported now that he called US military personnel who died in conflict "suckers" and "losers".

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/04/trump-soldiers-tammy-duckworth-joe-biden

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The curious case of the missing Woods file

If the IG didn't know the Woods File had been recreated by the SCO.

If the Senate Intell Comm didn't know the Woods File had been recreated.

But DOJ and FBI told the SSCI this week.

Who could have told DOJ and FBI what the SCO had done?

Andrew, you have any thoughts?

— shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 5, 2020

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

What is it with Trump and his reluctance to accept that Czar Vladimir IV might be a wrong un. I presume you can buy Novichok over the counter in parts of Siberia so it could have been anybody with a grudge against the leading opposition figure to President for life.

Why the German government is unequivocal and the Secretary General of NATO said there is proof beyond doubt when the Leader of the Free World said he's still waiting for the "numbers" ? god only knows.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/515219-trump-says-he-has-seen-no-proof-navalny-poisoning-awaiting-german