The Donald Trump thread

[Mrs Steve R]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Everyone's sabre rattling. Yanks against Syria and North Korea. Russia and Iran against USA by telling them not to do similar in Syria again. North Korea versus USA and China getting arsey with North Korea. Meanwhile on the main board speculation is rife over who might be Tiger Woods' new girlfriend, and why is Simon Cowell limping - is it because of a painful verruca or ingrown toenail?

I've heard they can be quite sore.

[Vimana.]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Everyone's sabre rattling. Yanks against Syria and North Korea. Russia and Iran against USA by telling them not to do similar in Syria again. North Korea versus USA and China getting arsey with North Korea. Meanwhile on the main board speculation is rife over who might be Tiger Woods' new girlfriend, and why is Simon Cowell limping - is it because of a painful verruca or ingrown toenail?

Or rather too much of some other physical activity that he pretends to not enjoy?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Or rather too much of some other physical activity that he pretends to not enjoy?

Are you suggestion he's been sticking his toe up somebody's arse? Whose arse is it anyway?

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Team Donald's latest Tweetyweety:

"North Korea is looking for trouble. If China decides to help, that would be great. If not, we will solve the problem without them! U.S.A."

Apparently written by a 10 year old and chosen as the winning entry by Team Donald.

Don't worry folks, it's only WW3 we are playing with on Twitter today. [ATTACH=CONFIG]1420[/ATTACH]

U.K.

BLUEBIRDS!
TREVOR!
SO THERE.

Three months ago I would have said that Tweet was a piss take - there was no way on earth that a President of the United States would say something like that for public consumption, I know better now we've got Trump's team of none of the talents in charge.

[Vimana.]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

yadda yadda !
TREVOR!
yadda .

Trevor?! - FWIW, I meant to type 'VICTOR!' roll.gif

[Vimana.]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Three months ago I would have said that Tweet was a piss take - there was no way on earth that a President of the United States would say something like that for public consumption, I know better now we've got Trump's team of none of the talents in charge.

It is quite feasible that they really are meant to be a kind of deliberate p1ss-take. Not necessarily toward N. Korea, nor China etc but possibly to create further division and confusion on 'home turf' between his followers who like this kind of approach, and his detractors who do not.
There are theories as to why that divisiveness might be considered useful to Team Trump, but I'm not sure that it is quite panning out as they expect so far.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Better post this now as I might forget upon hearing the two-minute warning siren.

[Mrs Steve R]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Better post this now as I might forget upon hearing the two-minute warning siren.

Bring on the DOOM porn.

[LordKenwyne]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Unsure if it has been said on here but in an interview Trump said they sent 59 missiles to Iraq to send a message...

How much of an influence will trump have over the armed forces? I doubt that much. I always imagined the military being quite ring fenced. Is that correct?.

It is not like Trump will being sitting around a world map drawing up plans. He may just ok just of the more stupid ideas given to him.

He has been in charge for 3 months now, learning on the job. He probably had no idea where idlib or wherever was prior to his win.

So it gives me the idea there is a underlying set of instructions that would have been carried out regardless of who was in power. Different faces, same plan.

Am I being paranoid?. Maybe. Or maybe Trump sat down with some murky characters post election win and they said, "Look, this is how it is going to go in regard our foreign policy".

Did George Bush draw up the idea to invade Iraq?. No chance. There are some advisers somewhere calling all the shots. Their advisory roles cemented even when power is passed from one person to another in the main job.

I could well be babbling a load of rubbish here.

[CardiffIrish2]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Unsure if it has been said on here but in an interview Trump said they sent 59 missiles to Iraq to send a message...

How much of an influence will trump have over the armed forces? I doubt that much. I always imagined the military being quite ring fenced. Is that correct?.

It is not like Trump will being sitting around a world map drawing up plans. He may just ok just of the more stupid ideas given to him.

He has been in charge for 3 months now, learning on the job. He probably had no idea where idlib or wherever was prior to his win.

So it gives me the idea there is a underlying set of instructions that would have been carried out regardless of who was in power. Different faces, same plan.

Am I being paranoid?. Maybe. Or maybe Trump sat down with some murky characters post election win and they said, "Look, this is how it is going to go in regard our foreign policy".

Did George Bush draw up the idea to invade Iraq?. No chance. There are some advisers somewhere calling all the shots. Their advisory roles cemented even when power is passed from one person to another in the main job.

I could well be babbling a load of rubbish here.

Still more sense then a Donald Trump tweet don't be harsh on yourself 😃

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Unsure if it has been said on here but in an interview Trump said they sent 59 missiles to Iraq to send a message...

How much of an influence will trump have over the armed forces? I doubt that much. I always imagined the military being quite ring fenced. Is that correct?.

It is not like Trump will being sitting around a world map drawing up plans. He may just ok just of the more stupid ideas given to him.

He has been in charge for 3 months now, learning on the job. He probably had no idea where idlib or wherever was prior to his win.

So it gives me the idea there is a underlying set of instructions that would have been carried out regardless of who was in power. Different faces, same plan.

Am I being paranoid?. Maybe. Or maybe Trump sat down with some murky characters post election win and they said, "Look, this is how it is going to go in regard our foreign policy".

Did George Bush draw up the idea to invade Iraq?. No chance. There are some advisers somewhere calling all the shots. Their advisory roles cemented even when power is passed from one person to another in the main job.

I could well be babbling a load of rubbish here.

Are you referring to the CFR?

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Another good one. Described the long dead Pavarotti as a great friend of his.

[LordKenwyne]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Are you referring to the CFR?

I've been reading their website for a while and I just thought they were a think tank/they collated articles from around the world.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

overcomb.jpg