The Donald Trump thread

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Yes, but it's not connected to the first sentence.

It's rather trivial arguing about syntax and grammar when his meaning is clear.

Back to my question that you missed on the previous page. Why is he trying to keep that 'disturbing news' quiet?

Or were your sentences unconnected?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It's rather trivial arguing about syntax and grammar when his meaning is clear.

Back to my question that you missed on the previous page. Why is he trying to keep that 'disturbing news' quiet?

Or were your sentences unconnected?

If I tweet the following ..

"Since taking my coaching badge I have become an better manager. Good news - it was just reported that 18 Premier League games in a row is a new milestone, the best year on record!"

Am I taking the credit for what Manchester City achieved?

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

If I tweet the following ..

"Since taking my coaching badge I have become an better manager. Good news - it was just reported that 18 Premier League games in a row is a new milestone, the best year on record!"

Am I taking the credit for what Manchester City achieved?

This is trivial.

How about the previous question?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

This is trivial.

How about the previous question?

Ok, at least you can now see how Twitter works. Trump and many others don't use paragraphs as you are only alowed 140 characters, so just remember in the future that it's only tweet, not a Pulitzer Prize winning novel

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Ok, at least you can now see how Twitter works. Trump and many others don't use paragraphs as you are only alowed 140 characters, so just remember in the future that it's only tweet, not a Pulitzer Prize winning novel

280 characters. All the more reason for sentences to be connected. Now, previous question?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

280 characters. All the more reason for sentences to be connected. Now, previous question?

What was it again?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Trump eclipses himself

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the “Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.” Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

What was it again?

It was that post where you were trying to be smart but ballsed it up.

Oh yeah, I can see why you're not sure which one

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Trump eclipses himself

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the “Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.” Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!

My button is bigger than yours, nah, nah, nannah, nah - Trump tackling the weighty matters of international politics in his inimitable style , he probably spent the next half an hour telling everyone he saw about how clever he'd been.

[CardiffIrish2]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Wel old orange face’s latest attempt at cock displaying will appeal to his cheerleaders and other deluded minions who will salivate with excitement at this whilst musing over the latest bit of bollocks on Breitbart.

Whilst anyone with a brain bigger then a Sultana will cringe at this quite crass piecce of macho aggrandisement.

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Wel old orange face’s latest attempt at cock displaying will appeal to his cheerleaders and other deluded minions who will salivate with excitement at this whilst musing over the latest bit of bollocks on Breitbart.

Whilst anyone with a brain bigger then a Sultana will cringe at this quite crass piecce of macho aggrandisement.

If you ever wondered where gets his ideas:

DSlz1-6WsAAY9Ih.jpg

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

If you ever wondered where gets his ideas:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2032[/ATTACH]

Actually he's responding to the news cycle, that is his cue. If he mentions things before they are reported he will be accused of collusion, attacking political opponents, and influencing the justice department. They will also try to impeach him for it. Trumpy is always a few steps ahead.

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Actually he's responding to the news cycle, that is his cue. If he mentions things before they are reported he will be accused of collusion, attacking political opponents, and influencing the justice department. They will also try to impeach him for it. Trumpy is always a few steps ahead.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I wouldn't read too much into it, it's all rather trivial arguing about syntax and grammar. What about Huma Abedin giving away classfied state passwords to foreign intelligence agencies, and Obama handing Hezbollah a free pass to run drugs and operate a stolen used car network in America, that generated over a billion dollars which was used to fund nefarious deeds around the globe? Where is the outrage about that? Trump tweeted about both of those events, but the media has been very slow latching onto them!

Obviously only stupid people would look at two sentences in the same tweet both relating to aviation and think that they were in any way related. I was trying to understand whether there is merit in Trump's boast that he has been strict on commercial aviation but now you have highlighted the error of my ways I won't read too much into the absence of any substance to support this assertion.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Obviously only stupid people would look at two sentences in the same tweet both relating to aviation and think that they were in any way related. I was trying to understand whether there is merit in Trump's boast that he has been strict on commercial aviation but now you have highlighted the error of my ways I won't read too much into the absence of any substance to support this assertion.

I think he was just trolling and it seemed to work as it was the main story for all the big MSM guys ... and hardly any mention of Iran? Strange days