An obviously fake poll.
Announcement
The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
....I asked John for his resignation, which was given to me this morning. I thank John very much for his service. I will be naming a new National Security Advisor next week.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 10, 2019
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
For once I agree with 45, he’s a right rotter that oneOriginally posted by Wales-Bales View Post....I asked John for his resignation, which was given to me this morning. I thank John very much for his service. I will be naming a new National Security Advisor next week.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 10, 2019
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Listen, I’m voting for 45 in 2020, because he’s earned it with his policies. I thought I made myself perfectly clear on that. If I wasn’t, now you know. I just haven’t had the chance to “explain” in detail ‘why’ I’m just one out of millions of black voters who’ll vote for him too pic.twitter.com/Wc2l3NYWuC
— Isaiah Washington (@IWashington) September 14, 2019
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
The rats (aka lardy & cyril heroes) are fleeing the sinking ship!
UPDATE: McCabe's spokesperson now says Brennan, Rice, Holder won't be testifying as character witnesses for him after all, despite calling the full witness list (below) "accurate" just a few hours ago. https://t.co/i6j2G8ctfK pic.twitter.com/Gzff6ZyFJd
— Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) September 16, 2019
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
If the latest reporting is accurate, we know that Donald Trump had a phone call with a foreign leader, during which he made a provocative “promise.” We know a U.S. intelligence official considered the presidential vow alarming and filed a complaint on Aug. 12. We know the intelligence community’s inspector general considered the whistleblower’s complaint credible and urgent.
We know the Trump-appointed acting DNI ignored legal requirements related to congressional disclosure. We know the intelligence community’s inspector general was uncomfortable with the DNI’s decision to ignore the law, and the IG, Michael Atkinson, made the relevant congressional committees aware of the existence of the complaint earlier this month.
We don’t know what, specifically, the president promised one of his foreign counterparts, or to whom he was speaking. There is, however, a limited number of foreign leaders Trump spoke to around the relevant dates, and the Post’s article noted a July 31 phone conversation the Republican had with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Hmm, Was it:Originally posted by lardy View Posthttp://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...blower-scandal
If the latest reporting is accurate, we know that Donald Trump had a phone call with a foreign leader, during which he made a provocative “promise.” We know a U.S. intelligence official considered the presidential vow alarming and filed a complaint on Aug. 12. We know the intelligence community’s inspector general considered the whistleblower’s complaint credible and urgent.
We know the Trump-appointed acting DNI ignored legal requirements related to congressional disclosure. We know the intelligence community’s inspector general was uncomfortable with the DNI’s decision to ignore the law, and the IG, Michael Atkinson, made the relevant congressional committees aware of the existence of the complaint earlier this month.
We don’t know what, specifically, the president promised one of his foreign counterparts, or to whom he was speaking. There is, however, a limited number of foreign leaders Trump spoke to around the relevant dates, and the Post’s article noted a July 31 phone conversation the Republican had with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
a) Eastern Ukraine;
b) Greenland (suitable profit margin);
c) Melania or
d) all of the above?
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Recommended reading:
Trump - Woodward - Fear.jpg Trump - Wolff - Fire and Fury.jpg Trump - Wolff - Siege.jpg
I have just finished the second Wolff book, Siege. Bannon is probably the main source for both his books. Fascinating and shocking - and almost all true, with just a couple of unsourced assertions. The Woodward book is 100% true.
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
It's about as true as the Steele dossier, which is very true according to lardyOriginally posted by jon1959 View PostRecommended reading:
I have just finished the second Wolff book, Siege. Bannon is probably the main source for both his books. Fascinating and shocking - and almost all true, with just a couple of unsourced assertions. The Woodward book is 100% true.
Comment
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
I guess those law revering, democracy loving, independent thinking, intellectually superior minds would be all over this. Particularly as Inspector General reports and whistle-blowers have been so important in their narrative. Seems I was hasty to completely ignore their views just when deep state are denying an IG and whistleblower transparency to the people.Originally posted by jon1959 View PostRecommended reading:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3245[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]3246[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]3247[/ATTACH]
I have just finished the second Wolff book, Siege. Bannon is probably the main source for both his books. Fascinating and shocking - and almost all true, with just a couple of unsourced assertions. The Woodward book is 100% true.
Comment



Comment