Matt LeTissier.

[TWGL1]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I call out people who post nonsense like the moving corpse video. I agree, they don't like it when I do.

I don't agree that it is about different opinions. Showing that something is completely false is not about opinion.

I'm not going to put you on ignore. But it seems you don't like what I post, so can I ask why you haven't followed your own advice and put me on ignore?

We are going over old ground.As I’ve said we will agree to disagree. Ultimately at first glance it appeared false propaganda and it still could be , however , With some posts you have to consider service users like yourself and it’s not worth the noise. This thread is a classic example.

[lardy]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

We are going over old ground.As I’ve said we will agree to disagree.

What are we agreeing to disagree about?

I said that facts are not the same as opinions. Is that what you're disagreeing with?

[TWGL1]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I’ve got to go to work shortly , do you work ?

[lardy]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I’ve got to go to work shortly , do you work ?

I do. Hope you don't take your frustrations out on your colleagues! Remember, it's not their fault about what happened on this thread

[TWGL1]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I do. Hope you don't take your frustrations out on your colleagues! Remember, it's not their fault about what happened on this thread

Quite, you thrive on it , clearly , why don’t you ask the messageboard owner if you can moderate, as you appear above your station in this instance

[lardy]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

Quite, you thrive on it , clearly , why don’t you ask the messageboard owner if you can moderate, as you appear above your station in this instance

Be careful what you wish for. If I was moderating I'd soon clamp down on the fake news nonsense.

[TWGL1]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

Be careful what you wish for. If I was moderating I'd soon clamp down on the fake news nonsense.

But I’d already deleted the news item , yet you felt compelled to screen grab it and repost it, so you’re full of it.

Messageboard anonymity again Lardy ?

[delmbox]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I think with most things on line , it could be argued both ways if it’s genuine or not.

I hope you realise how mad this take is

[TWGL1]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I hope you realise how mad this take is

In hindsight perhaps your response is correct …oh the joys of not walking away from a debate

[delmbox]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

In hindsight perhaps your response is correct …oh the joys of not walking away from a debate

[life on mars]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

Poor Le Tizz has been cancelled , brilliant example of closing down debate and different views by personal attacks

[TWGL1]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

If the media coverage was fair and impartial, very few accusations of “misinformation spreading”would occur. Credible reporting would crush any falsehoods. It is a testimony to just how little the public actually know probably is one of the main reasons that such brutal accusations continue.

This has been the case for quite some time.
Climate change and the pandemic is the same.

[lardy]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

In hindsight perhaps your response is correct …oh the joys of not walking away from a debate

There's hope for you yet!

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

Poor Le Tizz has been cancelled , brilliant example of closing down debate and different views by personal attacks

What was cancelled, by whom and why?

I read the report that he had posted some fake news (trying to undermine reports of Russian atrocities in Ukraine), got called out for it, deleted it and stepped aside as a Saints Ambassador as a result.

Which bits did you see were brilliant examples of closing down debate and different views by personal attack? What examples of fake nonsense do you want spread more widely as a result?

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Matt LeTissier.

I saw LeTissier described in a magazine article as the sort of libertarian who wants the freedom to do what he likes no matter what the consequences of that were to others - would have thought that was pretty bleeding obvious actually and rather comes with the territory with those who identify with the term.