Booster conundrum

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

This looks like your dailyexpose time of the month, Morg. You might remember last month's episode.

https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?452514-The-2021-22-Conspiracy-Theory-Ballon-D-Or-winner-The-Great-Reset&p=5286110&viewfull=1#post5286110

The reknowned website is still trying to persuade the gullible to part with their hard earned cash/bitcoin/gold as threat of losing its valuable insight forever. Perish the thought that you would have to start thinking for yourself.

As last time, the report the breathless article references has a section on vaccine effectiveness which clearly shows that it significantly reduces the risk of hospitalisation and death.

The bit of the table that the Dailyexpose, conclusion You're being lied to, didn't want you to see about relative death and hospitalisation between vaccinated and unvaccinated is now on Page 45 rather than Page 41 as stated in last month's response.

Shall we set a date for next month, if the dailyexpose is still in business (my guess is that it is) or just bookmark the last two months worth to save the keystrokes?

Once more as your attention span is awry this morning. I didn't make up the 7-day average on the relative dates a year apart. You or anyone else can check their veracity.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Booster conundrum

13 times more than the same date a year prior - are you kidding? I understand it's a struggle for you to dismiss government numbers, but that was a weak contribution.

The 'safe and effective' vaccines don't stop infection nor transmission, and as for reducing symptoms, there's no worse symptom than dying - and they don't stop that either, in fact they increase the risk, that's if a heart attack don't polish them off first.

Why not go back another year, before the vaccine and compare to see whether your point still stands, Morg. In the meantime you will no doubt say that the complete absence of AIDS on death certificates is all part of a massive cover up by the medical profession in hock to Big Pharma.

Here's a picture if it helps

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

Ah, too difficult for you to explain the disparity between the dates mentioned. Deflect to 2020 it is then.

Incidentally, where's Burt these days? You haven't been squeezing his knee and offering him sweeties again, I hope.

[TWGL1]

Re: Booster conundrum

Ah, too difficult for you to explain the disparity between the dates mentioned. Deflect to 2020 it is then.

Incidentally, where's Burt these days? You haven't been squeezing his knee and offering him sweeties again, I hope.

Booster take up low looking at dashboard for England ( scroll down)

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/18/19milllion-unvaccinated-31million-not-boosted-england/

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Booster conundrum

Ah, too difficult for you to explain the disparity between the dates mentioned. Deflect to 2020 it is then.

Incidentally, where's Burt these days? You haven't been squeezing his knee and offering him sweeties again, I hope.

How difficult is this for you Morg.

Since the UK has decided to "live" with the virus, infection rates have gone through the roof to now record levels since the outbreak began. Vaccines are a barrier to infection, hospitalisation and death but have varying degrees of prevention, which diminishes over time as the vaccines wear off.

You seek a comparison with a period in the direct aftermath of a stringent lockdown where physical contact between individuals was extremely limited and the vaccine roll-out was gearing up, ie the lockdown achieved the intended results. Comparing that data with a year earlier with no vaccine and pre-lockdown effect paints a completely different picture.

The only way to square this circle you suggest is to accept that the increase mortality is as a result of an HIV spike protein in the vaccine. The last time you tried this one was an extract from a BBC documentary that brought ridicule upon you for the umpteenth time.

Sometimes it's just safer to stay in the bunker.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

Presuming the UK government figures are correct, there's 39 million (58%) Britons boosted, 49 million (73%) double dippers and 52 million (79%) have had a single dose. Yet the state intends to hide the data going forward that Covid needling increases risk because they are hoping to bolster the above percentages, especially the single dose one, by enticing as many gormless parents and guardians of those aged 5 to 11 as they possibly can.

P. T. Barnum's "there's a sucker born every minute" observation is apposite.

As we saw with the recent vaccine passport protocol trials at sporting events and nightclubs, those needle lovers didn't give a flying feck about the outright discrimination deployed against those who refused prescribed Covid medical procedures required for entry: instead of protesting the measures outside the venues, or absenting themselves, they piled inside to endorse them.

Up until then I had sympathy for those duped into taking an experimental concoction which are in a trial period until next year.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Booster conundrum

Presuming the UK government figures are correct, there's 39 million (58%) Britons boosted, 49 million (73%) double dippers and 52 million (79%) have had a single dose. Yet the state intends to hide the data going forward that Covid needling increases risk because they are hoping to bolster the above percentages, especially the single dose one, by enticing as many gormless parents and guardians of those aged 5 to 11 as they possibly can.

P. T. Barnum's "there's a sucker born every minute" observation is apposite.

As we saw with the recent vaccine passport protocol trials at sporting events and nightclubs, those needle lovers didn't give a flying feck about the outright discrimination deployed against those who refused prescribed Covid medical procedures required for entry: instead of protesting the measures outside the venues, or absenting themselves, they piled inside to endorse them.

Up until then I had sympathy for those duped into taking an experimental concoction which are in a trial period until next year.

Page 38 of the report. Probably made up though!

Results
The rate of a positive COVID-19 test varies by age and vaccination status. This is likely to be due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.

The rate of hospitalisation within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with age, and is substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated individuals.

The rate of death within 28 days or within 60 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with age, and again is substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to fully vaccinated individuals.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

Freedom of Information request to a Blackpool hospital.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/heart_failure_diagnostic_clinic?unfold=1

Please can you provide the total number of patients that have been referred to the Heart Failure Diagnostic Clinic within your trust for the following years:

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022 (to date)

Our Response.

2017 -
2018 - 213
2019 - 172
2020 - 63
2021 - 603
2022 (to the end of February) - 104

That question and reply in an image form - https://imgur.com/a/4LnLJlZ#VaY9oUb

Having gazed into my crystal ball, I already know what Cyril's response will be so I'll save him the trouble of replying.

'The gigantic leap in 2021 which coincides with when the super-duper clot shots were first adminstered has nothing to do with lovely mRNA jabs despite the anti-Semites at the Yankee FDA listing myocarditis, pericarditis and acute myocardial infarction among their long list of possible adverse events which they published during October 2020 (Page 17, here: https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download). Another in their stupid, crackpot list is 'deaths' and of course everyone outside of loony tunes conspiracy theorists and people fond of eating raw radishes know that no-one has died as a result of volunteering for a beautiful Covid-19 syringe. Yabba dabba doo, three Hail Satan's and shake your booty.'

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Booster conundrum

Freedom of Information request to a Blackpool hospital.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/heart_failure_diagnostic_clinic?unfold=1

Please can you provide the total number of patients that have been referred to the Heart Failure Diagnostic Clinic within your trust for the following years:

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022 (to date)

Our Response.

2017 -
2018 - 213
2019 - 172
2020 - 63
2021 - 603
2022 (to the end of February) - 104

That question and reply in an image form - https://imgur.com/a/4LnLJlZ#VaY9oUb

Having gazed into my crystal ball, I already know what Cyril's response will be so I'll save him the trouble of replying.

'The gigantic leap in 2021 which coincides with when the super-duper clot shots were first adminstered has nothing to do with lovely mRNA jabs despite the anti-Semites at the Yankee FDA listing myocarditis, pericarditis and acute myocardial infarction among their long list of possible adverse events which they published during October 2020 (Page 17, here: https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download). Another in their stupid, crackpot list is 'deaths' and of course everyone outside of loony tunes conspiracy theorists and people fond of eating raw radishes know that no-one has died as a result of volunteering for a beautiful Covid-19 syringe. Yabba dabba doo, three Hail Satan's and shake your booty.'

I have to say that I had little idea until now that you were such a fan of Professor Zacharias and the Blackpool unit's ground breaking endoscopy procedure treating patients being referred from all over England. You continue to surprise me!

https://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/people/cardiac-patient-travels-250-miles-from-london-to-blackpool-for-delicate-heart-surgery-3047035

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

Long video featuring a CEO of a US life insurance company who says he's never seen such a jump in deaths among the working age population, those being aged 18 to 64. Most are conking out - surprise, surprise - while clutching their chests.

40% Surge in Working Age Deaths - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G__wIceF_hw

In the first five minutes they touch on Remdesivir. US hospitals were incentivised to give patients that and bung them on a ventilator to collect loads of government money. Same horse in the UK minus monetising the same death protocol. Anything other than Ivermectin to bump the fatalities up in alliance with a wholly fake PCR test.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Booster conundrum

Long video featuring a CEO of a US life insurance company who says he's never seen such a jump in deaths among the working age population, those being aged 18 to 64. Most are conking out - surprise, surprise - while clutching their chests.

40% Surge in Working Age Deaths - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G__wIceF_hw

In the first five minutes they touch on Remdesivir. US hospitals were incentivised to give patients that and bung them on a ventilator to collect loads of government money. Same horse in the UK minus monetising the same death protocol. Anything other than Ivermectin to bump the fatalities up in alliance with a wholly fake PCR test.

Is it a better game to guess the number of clicks it takes to challenge your own thoughts if you put your mind to it?

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/11/blog-posting/no-covid-19-vaccines-arent-responsible-increase-de/

[Tito Fuente]

Re: Booster conundrum

Is it a better game to guess the number of clicks it takes to challenge your own thoughts if you put your mind to it?

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...e-increase-de/

Every.

Single.

Time.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

I posted on this page a link to the FDA document anticipating heart issues with the vaccines.

What we don't know is whether this phenomenon will persist. There's plenty of censored experts who think it will and become much worse.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Booster conundrum

Every.

Single.

Time.

Ask yourself who owns the so-called Fact Checkers. You're another one who I'd bet a significant sum trotted off three times to get an armful of junk without realising all the risks were yours while the makers were indemnified.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Booster conundrum

I posted on this page a link to the FDA document anticipating heart issues with the vaccines.

What we don't know is whether this phenomenon will persist. There's plenty of censored experts who think it will and become much worse.

How does an "expert" become censored. Morg? Give us a couple of examples.