Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MHRA Funding

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: MHRA Funding

    Originally posted by Gofer Blue View Post
    Ah, it's about COVID, what a surprise! I have had both Astra Zeneca and Pfizer jabs in the full knowledge that these vaccines were produced in record time and therefore long term safety data would not be available. If there had been any serious issues during the initial clinical trials then the studies would have been halted (as indeed happened with the A-Z vaccine until it was properly investigated). So, yes, there was a risk. The alternative was catching COVID and I well remember those interviews with folk in hospitals who were near deaths-door urging the unvaccinated to have the jab asap.

    I think these "heroes" who are strongly anti-vaccine should thank those people who did have it as the latter saved the NHS from being rapidly overwhelmed, potentially leading to apocalyptic scenes of people dying unattended on stretchers in hospital car parks.
    Top post. Exactly right.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: MHRA Funding

      It was Pfizer in association with the US Food and Drug Administration who were desperate to hide their clinical trial data for 75 years.

      And why? Because both knew those trials showed their jab was anything other than safe and effective. It's also why corporate media keep mum about the details of what a judge forced them to publish.

      FDA Knew 44% Of Pregnant Women In Pfizer Trial Suffered Miscarriages - https://greatgameindia.com/pfizer-trial-miscarriages/

      It is indisputable that neither Pfizer nor the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is at all concerned about adverse events related to Pfizer’s clinical trial data. After all, they sought to hide it from the general public for 75 years. While blatantly unacceptable, the fact both parties knew that 44 percent of pregnant women participating in the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” trial suffered miscarriages is immoral and seems incredibly corrupt.

      Shockingly, as the FDA releases Pfizer trial data each month per court order, a Pfizer adverse events report transferred on July 1, 2022, reveals that after the women lost their babies, the billion-dollar big pharma giant reported that the heartbreaking miscarriages were unrelated to the trial. The volunteer team at Daily Clout discovered the intentional deceit by scouring through the thousands upon thousands of Pfizer trial documents released each month that form the rationale behind the FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA) and subsequent August 23, 2021, “approval” of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” product.

      According to an article in Daily Clout, the women listed in Listing of Subjects Reporting Pregnancy After Dose 1 each received between one and four of Pfizer’s mRNA injections. Forty-two received the trial drug right away, and eight received the placebo and were then unblinded and given the vaccine. Thus, by March 31, 2021, all of the pregnant women in the trial—there were 50 of them—had received Pfizer’s BNT162b2 version of its experimental “vaccine.” Summarizing Pfizer’s deceptive efforts after the miscarriages, the article explained:

      With access to this startling data by April 1, 2022, the article points out that the FDA was aware that a “significant percentage of pregnancies ended in ‘Abortion Spontaneous.’” Yet, despite this, the agency “failed in its duty to study the data and investigate what basis Pfizer had for marking the fetal deaths as unrelated to the vaccine and having ‘Other’ causes.” Moreover, the FDA failed to inform the public of this life-changing, serious adverse event. Most importantly, Daily Clout’s Berberine wrote, “without that information, women were not able to give informed consent for receiving Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine.”

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: MHRA Funding

        Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
        It was Pfizer in association with the US Food and Drug Administration who were desperate to hide their clinical trial data for 75 years.

        And why? Because both knew those trials showed their jab was anything other than safe and effective. It's also why corporate media keep mum about the details of what a judge forced them to publish.

        FDA Knew 44% Of Pregnant Women In Pfizer Trial Suffered Miscarriages - https://greatgameindia.com/pfizer-trial-miscarriages/

        It is indisputable that neither Pfizer nor the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is at all concerned about adverse events related to Pfizer’s clinical trial data. After all, they sought to hide it from the general public for 75 years. While blatantly unacceptable, the fact both parties knew that 44 percent of pregnant women participating in the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” trial suffered miscarriages is immoral and seems incredibly corrupt.

        Shockingly, as the FDA releases Pfizer trial data each month per court order, a Pfizer adverse events report transferred on July 1, 2022, reveals that after the women lost their babies, the billion-dollar big pharma giant reported that the heartbreaking miscarriages were unrelated to the trial. The volunteer team at Daily Clout discovered the intentional deceit by scouring through the thousands upon thousands of Pfizer trial documents released each month that form the rationale behind the FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA) and subsequent August 23, 2021, “approval” of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” product.

        According to an article in Daily Clout, the women listed in Listing of Subjects Reporting Pregnancy After Dose 1 each received between one and four of Pfizer’s mRNA injections. Forty-two received the trial drug right away, and eight received the placebo and were then unblinded and given the vaccine. Thus, by March 31, 2021, all of the pregnant women in the trial—there were 50 of them—had received Pfizer’s BNT162b2 version of its experimental “vaccine.” Summarizing Pfizer’s deceptive efforts after the miscarriages, the article explained:

        With access to this startling data by April 1, 2022, the article points out that the FDA was aware that a “significant percentage of pregnancies ended in ‘Abortion Spontaneous.’” Yet, despite this, the agency “failed in its duty to study the data and investigate what basis Pfizer had for marking the fetal deaths as unrelated to the vaccine and having ‘Other’ causes.” Moreover, the FDA failed to inform the public of this life-changing, serious adverse event. Most importantly, Daily Clout’s Berberine wrote, “without that information, women were not able to give informed consent for receiving Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine.”
        I think around 50% of all pregnancies miscarry in any given situation, so this could well have been well within the bounds of what was expected.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: MHRA Funding

          I asked google for Yank miscarriage stats. This was the first answer:

          For women who know they're pregnant, about 10 to 15 in 100 pregnancies (10 to 15 percent) end in miscarriage. Most miscarriages happen in the first trimester before the 12th week of pregnancy. Miscarriage in the second trimester (between 13 and 19 weeks) happens in 1 to 5 in 100 (1 to 5 percent) pregnancies.

          The second link (here: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...s/syc-20354298) reports:

          About 10 to 20 percent of known pregnancies end in miscarriage.

          Meanwhile, this US billionaire said on Fox News he believes "hundreds of thousands" of Americans have been killed by Covid vaccines. Their excess mortalities (excluding Covid deaths) is currently running at 19,600 per week.


          Comment


          • #20
            Re: MHRA Funding

            Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
            I asked google for Yank miscarriage stats. This was the first answer:

            For women who know they're pregnant, about 10 to 15 in 100 pregnancies (10 to 15 percent) end in miscarriage. Most miscarriages happen in the first trimester before the 12th week of pregnancy. Miscarriage in the second trimester (between 13 and 19 weeks) happens in 1 to 5 in 100 (1 to 5 percent) pregnancies.

            The second link (here: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...s/syc-20354298) reports:

            About 10 to 20 percent of known pregnancies end in miscarriage.

            Meanwhile, this US billionaire said on Fox News he believes "hundreds of thousands" of Americans have been killed by Covid vaccines. Their excess mortalities (excluding Covid deaths) is currently running at 19,600 per week.



            Pregnant people were excluded from the trials and participants were asked to avoid becoming pregnant, but, nonetheless, 57 pregnancies occurred across the trials of the three vaccines that have so far been approved in the UK. The outcomes of these pregnancies, so far as they have progressed, are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference in the rate of accidental pregnancies in the vaccinated groups compared with the control groups, which indicates that the vaccines do not prevent pregnancy in humans. Similarly, the miscarriage rates are comparable between the groups, indicating no detrimental effect of vaccination on early pregnancy.


            Comment


            • #21
              Re: MHRA Funding

              Originally posted by Rjk View Post
              I think around 50% of all pregnancies miscarry in any given situation, so this could well have been well within the bounds of what was expected.
              I must say I find that an unbelievable statistic. Most references I can find on the Internet suggest much lower rates but the one from the WebMD.com is the one that quotes 50%. This is a bit misleading in a way because it reports that many miscarriages take place before the woman is aware that she is pregnant so I would ask how would that woman be able to report having a miscarriage under those circumstances? The article* goes on to say that 12 - 25% of "recognised pregnancies" end in miscarriage which is more realistic.

              * https://www.webmd.com/baby/guide/pregnancy-miscarriage

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: MHRA Funding

                Originally posted by Gofer Blue View Post
                I must say I find that an unbelievable statistic. Most references I can find on the Internet suggest much lower rates but the one from the WebMD.com is the one that quotes 50%. This is a bit misleading in a way because it reports that many miscarriages take place before the woman is aware that she is pregnant so I would ask how would that woman be able to report having a miscarriage under those circumstances? The article* goes on to say that 12 - 25% of "recognised pregnancies" end in miscarriage which is more realistic.

                * https://www.webmd.com/baby/guide/pregnancy-miscarriage
                and the miscarriages in the vaccine studies were apparently in line with that

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: MHRA Funding

                  Originally posted by Rjk View Post
                  and the miscarriages in the vaccine studies were apparently in line with that
                  I wonder how that squares then with OM's reference that FDA and Pfizer "knew" that 44% of pregnant women who had had the COVID vaccine subsequently miscarried? If this is true, once again I would ask, where were the whistleblowers?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X