Oxford Vaccine

[superfeathers]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

The article was from the Daily Mail :hehe:

Yes it’s out of date but it’s correct isn’t it ?

Well, you're already in derranged media territory :hehe:
It's as correct now, as it was correct before the first vaccines. Nothing's changed. It's not news. And I've no idea why it would or should put off anyone having a booster, who wasn't put off having a vaccine in the first place

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Anyway, I get that you're dubious of vaccines and that's fair enough, but please, jump onto Twitter and get some deranged websites to back it all up (you won't need to look far), because this thread is one of the most oddest i've read :ayatollah:

He could be dubious about gene therapy treatments with no long-term safety data, while still being in favour of traditional vaccines? You seem desperate to paint him into a corner with all of these labels you are trying to stick on him

[superfeathers]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

He could be dubious about gene therapy treatments with no long-term safety data, while still being in favour of traditional vaccines? You seem desperate to paint him into a corner with all of these labels you are trying to stick on him

See if it was just conspiritorial stuff like that I'd have just left it straight away and moved on

[TWGL1]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

See if it was just conspiritorial stuff like that I'd have just left it straight away and moved on

Quite :hehe:

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Your obsession with this is tiresome ,as I’ve said before , I used to post on here years ago , and started posting again when this account was opened. Is that the best you can do ?

Why are you so concerned, does it matter to you that much. Just accept people have different opinions to you.

To be fair to you you are probably the only user name I can recall from years ago, so how many others have changed user names, hundreds by the look of it.

It’s hardly an obsession, but you’ve referred to what you said on here two and a half years ago and it seems odd that you don’t want anyone to see what you were saying for themselves.

[goats]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

It’s hardly an obsession, but you’ve referred to what you said on here two and a half years ago and it seems odd that you don’t want anyone to see what you were saying for themselves.

Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid

[TWGL1]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

It’s hardly an obsession, but you’ve referred to what you said on here two and a half years ago and it seems odd that you don’t want anyone to see what you were saying for themselves.

I used to view the message-board as I’ve told you, can I ask why you are so concerned about me when clearly there are hundreds if not thousands of new accounts on here, it seems odd that you are only concerned about me.

You can add me of Facebook if you want :hehe:

[TWGL1]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid

You’re a bit cheeky mate….. if you’re referring to me ?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

See if it was just conspiratorial stuff like that I'd have just left it straight away and moved on

It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.

[Dorcus]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

I just wonder if this is really worth posting. We had a pandemic, get over it, we move on. If it comes again we do the same, we protect the elderly sick and vulnerable: common sense, no big deal

[Dorcus]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid

I think Lither is officially licking his wounds after being on the receiving end of a punishment beating by the board.

Unofficially, I wonder if he's trying to emerge from his shell and into the open .....al fresco sort of if you get my gist.

[jon1959]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.

That was just what was needed when the NHS was about to collapse with wards full, staff exhausted and new Covid patients stacked up in ambulances or taxis outside hospitals. Just hold on for 5 or 10 years whilst we check out some of the lesser side effects!

[TWGL1]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

I just wonder if this is really worth posting. We had a pandemic, get over it, we move on. If it comes again we do the same, we protect the elderly sick and vulnerable: common sense, no big deal

If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.

What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.

[superfeathers]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.

See, I’m not even remotely interested in engaging with this because clearly it’s someone with strong views, albeit views I think are mental. Obviously we’ve heard all this sort of stuff continually and it goes into a rabbit hole where insanity lies.

The original post on the other hand just seemed so odd!

[superfeathers]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.

What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.

Which do you dislike the most if you had to choose? :
Lockdowns
Vaccines that stopped lockdowns
Vaccine boosters that continued to prevent lockdowns
Recent news
Leo fortune west