Masks on children

[TWGL1]

Re: Masks on children

Agreed, but lately messages on this forum from certain posters have been attracting readers at a quicker rate than Carl Curtis’ updates used to.

It’s probably Brigade 77

I can’t even see the post count on my iPhone , what do you mean exactly?
I have noticed the Lardy Thread was higher than normal but is this post disproportionately high ?

High post count benefits the site owner only I would have thought through advertising?

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Masks on children

It’s probably Brigade 77

I can’t even see the post count on my iPhone , what do you mean exactly?
I have noticed the Lardy Thread was higher than normal but is this post disproportionately high ?

High post count benefits the site owner only I would have thought through advertising?

I noticed if first about ten days ago and just thought it was weird. However, if you look at the football board and compare the number of views each post gets compared to this one, the difference is huge. This thread for example is about what I agree is a shocking story, but it’s currently got close to 5,000 viewings despite being hijacked by people like me pointing out how many views it’s had. While there’s long runnings threads like the Trump one near the top of the board, all of the others at the top of it are pretty recent one, yet, apart from the one Life on Mars posted today are up in the thousands of views - the figures say that the number of people looking at this board is a lot more then on the football board and I just can’t believe that’s true.

[TWGL1]

Re: Masks on children

I noticed if first about ten days ago and just thought it was weird. However, if you look at the football board and compare the number of views each post gets compared to this one, the difference is huge. This thread for example is about what I agree is a shocking story, but it’s currently got close to 5,000 viewings despite being hijacked by people like me pointing out how many views it’s had. While there’s long runnings threads like the Trump one near the top of the board, all of the others at the top of it are pretty recent one, yet, apart from the one Life on Mars posted today are up in the thousands of views - the figures say that the number of people looking at this board is a lot more then on the football board and I just can’t believe that’s true.

Well it is high , perhaps more people are looking as it’s topical and against the main narrative?

It does make you wonder , that’s why I mentioned Brigade 77,

Ask Mike Morris I suppose.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Masks on children

Well it is high , perhaps more people are looking as it’s topical and against the main narrative?

It does make you wonder , that’s why I mentioned Brigade 77,

Ask Mike Morris I suppose.

Agreed. Anyone who thinks 14.5k posts in a couple of days on the subject of Lardy and Cyril was the work of an adolescent semi-housebound narcissist rather than that of a secretive British Army unit is simply not getting it.

[Canton Kev]

Re: Masks on children

I noticed if first about ten days ago and just thought it was weird. However, if you look at the football board and compare the number of views each post gets compared to this one, the difference is huge. This thread for example is about what I agree is a shocking story, but it’s currently got close to 5,000 viewings despite being hijacked by people like me pointing out how many views it’s had. While there’s long runnings threads like the Trump one near the top of the board, all of the others at the top of it are pretty recent one, yet, apart from the one Life on Mars posted today are up in the thousands of views - the figures say that the number of people looking at this board is a lot more then on the football board and I just can’t believe that’s true.

If I had to guess, it’s the ambiguity of the titles. Most threads people know if the topic is interesting to them based on the title. These threads could contain anything so more people click on them to see the content.

Whatever it is, I doubt Mike minds

[Dorcus]

Re: Masks on children

I clicked non it because I thought it was a great idea for a Christmas present and I wanted to know where to get them.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Masks on children

Well it is high , perhaps more people are looking as it’s topical and against the main narrative?

In years to come people will telling their kids the story of Lardy & Cyril.

[TWGL1]

Re: Masks on children

What I find incredible is that posters are more concerned with the admin of the board ( which has nothing at all to do with them) than the actual diktat needlessly imposed on to children in respect of masks in schools.

FoLlowiNG thE sciEncE

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Masks on children

What I find incredible is that posters are more concerned with the admin of the board ( which has nothing at all to do with them) than the actual diktat needlessly imposed on to children in respect of masks in schools.

FoLlowiNG thE sciEncE

Diversion tactics 101.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Masks on children

I am all in favour

Some of those kids are ugly as feck

[life on mars]

Re: Masks on children

I like a lady in a black silk mask
,long leather gloves , thigh length leather boots, fishnet stockings , all in the name of one's health of course