Harry and Meghan interview

[BLUETIT]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Thats totally different. She wanted to talk about it as a point of interest.

Questioning someone when they enter a relationship with a mixed race person have they considered the colour of their future baby is another.

They can't say who and they got different stories of when it was supposed to have happened. !!!!

Why are gullible people being taken in by their bullshit.

[delmbox]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Why are gullible people being taken in by their bullshit.

the irony though

[BLUETIT]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

the irony though

I know what you are trying to imply, but they have been caught out lying on 4 points already, without much effort. Anyone can find out why Archie can't be a prince (at the moment), she's seen her sister in the last 19 years, plus the money aspect.

If they have lied about simple things, why should anyone believe any of the other bullshit.

If they were making a "police statement", it would get torn to shreads

[ninian opinian]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Do you honestly believe the royals. Oh the irony Tony. The monarchy should have been gotten rid of years ago. They are a bunch of nutters.

[BLUETIT]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Do you honestly believe the royals. Oh the irony Tony. The monarchy should have been gotten rid of years ago. They are a bunch of nutters.

It's not about believing the royals, it's about our Megs statements being torn to shreds already, without a royal opening their gob.

[life on mars]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

No, it's William who supports Villa.

At the moment, wimp Haz, couldn't support anything.

Oh no not another media interview for chaps who feel isolated without a footy club

[life on mars]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Daddy speaks

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/thomas-markle-gmb-meghan-harry-b1814410.html?jwsource=cl

[surge]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

This has become the latest polarising issue which has people rush to one side of the debate and become unwilling to budge or see other side's point of view.

Interesting article about why Archie isn't a Prince yet and may not become one: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56325934

She referred in the interview to a "George V or George VI convention" that would mean her son Archie would become a prince "when Harry's dad becomes king".

But she went on to say that she had been told when she was pregnant that "they want to change the convention for Archie" so he would not become a prince.

"I saw that Meghan mentioned that there were plans to narrow eligibility and I imagine that this is a reference to the Prince of Wales's stated view that the size of the royal family needs to be reduced," said Bob Morris from the Constitution Unit at UCL.

Isn't that (a smaller and eventually non-existent royal family) what people want?

[ninian opinian]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

There are real human beings in the UK who have more hatred towards a pregnant woman because she's 'woke' and criticises the Royal family, than they have against politicians who've presided over 130,000 deaths and the worst economic recession in the western world.

Absolutely bonkers.

[Rjk]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

This has become the latest polarising issue which has people rush to one side of the debate and become unwilling to budge or see other side's point of view.

Interesting article about why Archie isn't a Prince yet and may not become one: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56325934



Isn't that (a smaller and eventually non-existent royal family) what people want?

Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY

https://www.republic.org.uk/petition

here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY

https://www.republic.org.uk/petition

here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.

No thanks

[BLUETIT]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY

https://www.republic.org.uk/petition

here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.

WHY ?

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

There are real human beings in the UK who have more hatred towards a pregnant woman because she's 'woke' and criticises the Royal family, than they have against politicians who've presided over 130,000 deaths and the worst economic recession in the western world.

Absolutely bonkers.

Always the same people who get pulled in by it too. Whipped up into a frenzy and staunchly defend it even though it doesn matter.

You can bet the venn diagram of people who hate harry and megan, also hate gary linekar for being paid to much at the bbc and lilly allen for having a spare bedroom is a ****ing circle.

[life on mars]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY

https://www.republic.org.uk/petition

here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.

no thanks

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Harry and Meghan interview

the irony though

I know ****ing hell :hehe: