Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wingers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wingers

    Probably my favourite position growing up to watch and play.

    These days reduced to the Jack Grealish style of mostly checking back and laying off or constantly cutting in.

    Last night was screaming for some width, for both teams really. Bowler and Tanner didn't see much of the ball but when they did it's often crowded out. Grant similarly the other side.

    It's not just us but modern football in general where inside forwards have basically taken over. Could we not even for a bit just let bowler or Tanner have a run down the left, get to the byline, cut it back.

    I loved the Tanner goal against Swansea of course but surely sometimes it has to be mixed up, particularly when you don't have the marauding full backs some teams have.


  • #2
    Re: Wingers

    I hear what your saying and it bores me to tears when a winger checks back and passes it back to the full back to cross, or to recycle the ball back into defensive midfield or the centre half, (or even worse the keeper!) but I think getting to the byline and getting crosses in is easier said than done these days. Gone are the days a full back is isolated one v one against the a tricky winger who can beat him with a bit of skill. Teams work so hard on defensive shape without the ball that shape and discipline is killing skill and entertainment, especially when a team just sits deep with two banks of defence (or low block as the kids call it these days).

    You only have to look at the way we set up last night, we played with almost two sets of full backs!!! When they had the ball Grant and Bowler were marking their wide men and our fullbacks were spare behind them, its so negative and boring to watch.

    What doesnt help is we dont have a Whitts or a Mcphail in the middle who can pick out runners, so even if Grant and Bowler make a great run off the ball theres no one to play them in. Colwill has a bit of quality but hes further forward and usually receving the ball with his back to goal on the half turn. We need someone with qualioty in the quarterbafk role and when the options are Siopis, Wintle ot Ralls, well,... just, well.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Wingers

      I have noticed that our wingers are often covered by 2 players too. Bowler always seems to have 2 to beat

      That should in theory leave space elsewhere but I never see it

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Wingers

        These modern defenders wouldn't have a clue against a team with Willie Anderson on the left and Dave Bennett on the right with Alan Warboys in the middle. It bores me rigid seeing these, 'inverted wingers,' never beating a man and a centre forward waiting for a bus that never comes. The whole point in attacking so that defenders are turned. Now it rarely ever happens. Progress? Methinks not.

        StT.
        <><

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Wingers

          I know the Dave Jones sides had no bottle but imagine them against this set up. It would be a cricket score.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Wingers

            Originally posted by Steve the Tea View Post
            These modern defenders wouldn't have a clue against a team with Willie Anderson on the left and Dave Bennett on the right with Alan Warboys in the middle. It bores me rigid seeing these, 'inverted wingers,' never beating a man and a centre forward waiting for a bus that never comes. The whole point in attacking so that defenders are turned. Now it rarely ever happens. Progress? Methinks not.

            StT.
            <><
            Wingers have had to evolve, as JR said teams work harder now on things such as defensive shape, so players are having to evolve to counter the tactics deployed against them. I am not entirely convinced that some winger from the 60s would just dance and skip around them, they were able to do this in their day because they had 1 fullback to beat and tactics weren't as evolved as in the modern day, they made the best of the way the game was played.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Wingers

              Oh for another Peter King! One of my all time favourite City players.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Wingers

                Only once did Bowler not check and turn back inside. He actually made the byline inside the box but didn’t have the power in his ‘swinger’ right foot to make any impression. Saying that, crosses into the box aren’t exactly going to be attacked by 7ft 2 Etete, he’s not tall enough

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Wingers

                  John Buchanan, Doug Livermore and /or Alan Campbell win the ball. They feed Willie Anderson who beats the full back and either Adrian Alson scores or sets up Tony Evans to score. Now that's when football was exciting!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Wingers

                    We just got to wait until Pep starts doing it and then they will all copy. Doku (?) is a throwback winger on the correct side though.

                    Tanner and Bowler have tried on their proper side and didn't have a clue what to do, they aren't very good either

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Wingers

                      Originally posted by Dembe View Post
                      Wingers have had to evolve, as JR said teams work harder now on things such as defensive shape, so players are having to evolve to counter the tactics deployed against them. I am not entirely convinced that some winger from the 60s would just dance and skip around them, they were able to do this in their day because they had 1 fullback to beat and tactics weren't as evolved as in the modern day, they made the best of the way the game was played.
                      Ollie Tanner was playing like anold fashioned winger for the first month to six weeks of the season and not doing too badly out of it, then Bulut got him playing like a full back.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Wingers

                        Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                        Ollie Tanner was playing like anold fashioned winger for the first month to six weeks of the season and not doing too badly out of it, then Bulut got him playing like a full back.
                        Another example of Bulut not being able to motivate or coach players to improve
                        He’s a busted flush and has failed as a Championship manager

                        I think he thought he could put himself in the window for a Premiership team if he did well.

                        More like a Welsh premier league manager than anything else

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Wingers

                          Originally posted by olderblue View Post
                          Another example of Bulut not being able to motivate or coach players to improve
                          He’s a busted flush and has failed as a Championship manager

                          I think he thought he could put himself in the window for a Premiership team if he did well.

                          More like a Welsh premier league manager than anything else
                          I doubt if TNS would touch him with a barge pole!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Wingers

                            Originally posted by Dembe View Post
                            Wingers have had to evolve, as JR said teams work harder now on things such as defensive shape, so players are having to evolve to counter the tactics deployed against them. I am not entirely convinced that some winger from the 60s would just dance and skip around them, they were able to do this in their day because they had 1 fullback to beat and tactics weren't as evolved as in the modern day, they made the best of the way the game was played.
                            That's my point Dembe. These players who play out wide these days rarely have the skills of a winger. They are not wingers. Again, I haven't said, disparagingly, that, 'some winger from the 60's,' etc. I've mentioned two above ability wingers at Tier 2 level purposely.

                            Give me Willie Anderson or Dave Bennett over Josh Bowler any day.

                            StT.
                            <><

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Wingers

                              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                              Ollie Tanner was playing like anold fashioned winger for the first month to six weeks of the season and not doing too badly out of it, then Bulut got him playing like a full back.
                              Originally posted by Steve the Tea View Post
                              That's my point Dembe. These players who play out wide these days rarely have the skills of a winger. They are not wingers. Again, I haven't said, disparagingly, that, 'some winger from the 60's,' etc. I've mentioned two above ability wingers at Tier 2 level purposely.

                              Give me Willie Anderson or Dave Bennett over Josh Bowler any day.

                              StT.
                              <><
                              Gerry Anderson or Hywell Bennett would be an improvement on Bowler

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X