Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting article re: Wagebill

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

    Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    I don’t get how anyone can know current wage figures for each player in this season’s Championship when we’re months away from getting the Accounts of the clubs involved in the public domain. Are we really to believe that we’re spending more than £7 million than Hull? However, I’m in agreement with those who say the embargo had only a limited impact on our workin the summers transfer.window and, although I can’t prove it, I firmly believe that the money Bulut had available last summer was enough to have led to a much more attractive style of football, and equally successful in terms of results, than we’ve seen since late October if he was so minded.
    Exactly. Signing two players on loan last summer that cost their parent clubs £15m and £4m. The EFL really come down hard on us with that embargo.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

      The embargo may have done us a favour.

      We may have ended up paying out fees for ageing players from abroad.

      Didnt Siopsis buy out his contract with his former club? I wonder what his signing on fee was?

      I have read that we had to rely on scraps in the summer. Well Bowler , Panzo , Grant would have been taken I reckon by many in this league. Bulut also got that dreadful Runnarson who hed worked with before. Throw in Goutas , Siopsis , Ramsey and its clear hes hardly worked on a shoestring. Hes also been able to extend contracts on certain players.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

        Originally posted by Hilts View Post
        The embargo may have done us a favour.

        We may have ended up paying out fees for ageing players from abroad.

        Didnt Siopsis buy out his contract with his former club? I wonder what his signing on fee was?

        I have read that we had to rely on scraps in the summer. Well Bowler , Panzo , Grant would have been taken I reckon by many in this league. Bulut also got that dreadful Runnarson who hed worked with before. Throw in Goutas , Siopsis , Ramsey and its clear hes hardly worked on a shoestring. Hes also been able to extend contracts on certain players.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

          Originally posted by Hilts View Post
          The embargo may have done us a favour.

          We may have ended up paying out fees for ageing players from abroad.

          Didnt Siopsis buy out his contract with his former club? I wonder what his signing on fee was?

          I have read that we had to rely on scraps in the summer. Well Bowler , Panzo , Grant would have been taken I reckon by many in this league. Bulut also got that dreadful Runnarson who hed worked with before. Throw in Goutas , Siopsis , Ramsey and its clear hes hardly worked on a shoestring. Hes also been able to extend contracts on certain players.
          You make some good points, he had to work hard to get players in a massively reduced pot, and we couldn't pay a fee for a player, it was a disadvantage but he made the most of a difficult situation.

          Next season he will still be able to sign loans, but will also have the whole transfer market open and will be able to sign actual players from the overseas leagues that he knows so well. It's a much better situation and should lead to fewer duds like Panzo and Runnarson.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

            Originally posted by North Cardiff Blue View Post
            You make some good points, he had to work hard to get players in a massively reduced pot, and we couldn't pay a fee for a player, it was a disadvantage but he made the most of a difficult situation.

            Next season he will still be able to sign loans, but will also have the whole transfer market open and will be able to sign actual players from the overseas leagues that he knows so well. It's a much better situation and should lead to fewer duds like Panzo and Runnarson.
            With any luck he wont be here next season to make any signings - loan or permanent.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

              Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
              With any luck he wont be here next season to make any signings - loan or permanent.
              Who would you want as a replacement out of interest , as Bulut is highly regarded apparently



              I wouldn’t have thought Bulut wasn’t a cheap appointment and will be more expensive next year if he moves his family over from Germany.

              His backroom team must be costing the club a bit aswell when you add on wages , accommodation costs , flights home etc.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                Who would you want as a replacement out of interest , as Bulut is highly regarded apparently



                I wouldn’t have thought Bulut wasn’t a cheap appointment and will be more expensive next year if he moves his family over from Germany.

                His backroom team must be costing the club a bit aswell when you add on wages , accommodation costs , flights home etc.
                The problem is it's not who he wants it's who Tan and Dalman appoint, history tells us it's five bad appointments to every good one, Warnock was the last decent appointment before Bulut.

                If he gets his wish it will be some daft useless ex-player, and he'll be moaning even more next season.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                  Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                  Who would you want as a replacement out of interest , as Bulut is highly regarded apparently



                  I wouldn’t have thought Bulut wasn’t a cheap appointment and will be more expensive next year if he moves his family over from Germany.

                  His backroom team must be costing the club a bit aswell when you add on wages , accommodation costs , flights home etc.
                  Craig Bellamy.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                    Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
                    Craig Bellamy.
                    Would be perfectly happy with that.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                      Originally posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
                      Would be perfectly happy with that.
                      It wont happen whilst Tan is here but the question was who would I want.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                        Originally posted by Hilts View Post
                        The embargo may have done us a favour.

                        We may have ended up paying out fees for ageing players from abroad.

                        Didnt Siopsis buy out his contract with his former club? I wonder what his signing on fee was?

                        I have read that we had to rely on scraps in the summer. Well Bowler , Panzo , Grant would have been taken I reckon by many in this league. Bulut also got that dreadful Runnarson who hed worked with before. Throw in Goutas , Siopsis , Ramsey and its clear hes hardly worked on a shoestring. Hes also been able to extend contracts on certain players.
                        Excellent post.
                        His job was to get the best of what we had, obviously limitations upfront but we had/have a very decent squad and I think we did well bringing players in during the summer considering.

                        Although I think it would be unfair for anyone to suggest the embargo helped us, we would have had a fraction of the players to choose from compared to other clubs.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                          Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
                          Craig Bellamy.
                          Good shout that TBF

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                            Originally posted by goats View Post
                            Did I hear right today that Leeds owe £190 million in transfer fees at this time? How can that be right, basically they’ve bought a whole team but not paid for anyone yet? Great gamble for promotion, but if it’s doable why don’t we all do it?
                            Isn't that what they did before?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                              Originally posted by Hilts View Post
                              The embargo may have done us a favour.

                              We may have ended up paying out fees for ageing players from abroad.

                              Didnt Siopsis buy out his contract with his former club? I wonder what his signing on fee was?

                              I have read that we had to rely on scraps in the summer. Well Bowler , Panzo , Grant would have been taken I reckon by many in this league. Bulut also got that dreadful Runnarson who hed worked with before. Throw in Goutas , Siopsis , Ramsey and its clear hes hardly worked on a shoestring. Hes also been able to extend contracts on certain players.
                              I think the Wintle one has to have been an April fool….surely? Ralls was because it seems obligatory to keep him and he has a painting of himself in his attic.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Interesting article re: Wagebill

                                Originally posted by Citizen's Nephew View Post
                                I think the Wintle one has to have been an April fool….surely? Ralls was because it seems obligatory to keep him and he has a painting of himself in his attic.
                                Thats the million dollar question for Buluts cult followers like Moz and NCB. If we are only playing this anti-football because Bulut cant get the players he wants until the summer, when we are not under embargo, and we dont have to pay over the odds in January, why are giving contracts to two players - Ralls and Wintle - who cant play the football he wants to play?

                                Add Siopis into the mix, another player who runs around like a headless chicken but struggles with passes beyond 10 yards, and when are we going to see this futsal style exciting football the likes Cardiff fans have never seen before?

                                its all a load of utter bollox. Hes a passive, negative, saftety first manager and the sooner we are rid the better.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X