Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sala case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Sala case

    Originally posted by light up the darkness View Post
    We have not heard yet about the role that Warnock played in terms of pushing through this transfer and his dealings with the illegal agents.

    It could be that UEFA go after him for conspiracy

    Anyway. Nantes have until September to respond
    If members of the McKay family have had to surrender Cardiff City related emails and correspondence as a result of the court action taken by the Club it may well reveal issues other than McKay links to Nantes which was the main purpose of the exercise

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Sala case

      Originally posted by Enoch Mort View Post
      If members of the McKay family have had to surrender Cardiff City related emails and correspondence as a result of the court action taken by the Club it may well reveal issues other than McKay links to Nantes which was the main purpose of the exercise
      The key point for me is they "have had to" - their statements imply they have cooperated - if so why has it taken court appearances to achieve this - all is of this stinks to high heaven and no one comes out with any grace and yet two people lost their lives but their memories get trampled on every single day - 5 years now and still no end in sight for them

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Sala case

        Originally posted by dml1954 View Post
        What is shameful is you continually quoting ‘facts’ that you have no idea whether they are true and using it to batter the club. If you bought an expensive car and paid for it in advance and then the garage arranged an unlicensed/illegal contractor to take it to you but it fell off the delivery lorry and was written off, you would sue the living daylights out of everybody you could to get your money back plus damages, loss of income, compensation and anything else your lawyer thought you could get. And yet, you expect us to believe that you would just shrug and say ‘cest la vie’ ? Nonsense.
        What are you on about?

        You’re defending a club trying to use a loophole to get out of paying for a player after a tragic accident because you happen to support that club.

        He wasn’t Nantes player. It is irrelevant that they employed McKay and McKay then arranged the flight. He was an ex-employee of Nantes and the fact they employed McKay has zero relevance.

        Comparing Sala to the delivery of a car, what a crass post. Also a completely wrong analogy. Take a look at yourself you embarrassment

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Sala case

          Originally posted by TheBirchgrovePub View Post
          What are you on about?

          You’re defending a club trying to use a loophole to get out of paying for a player after a tragic accident because you happen to support that club.

          He wasn’t Nantes player. It is irrelevant that they employed McKay and McKay then arranged the flight. He was an ex-employee of Nantes and the fact they employed McKay has zero relevance.

          Comparing Sala to the delivery of a car, what a crass post. Also a completely wrong analogy. Take a look at yourself you embarrassment
          You seem to miss the point completely. Cardiff City have already paid for the player and donated a significant sum to the Sala Trust Fund which significantly F C Nantes and the PFA declined to do so. The case revolves around whether Nantes in their dealings with Cardiff re. the Sala transfer employed an unlicenced agent which would be illegal in French law and materially determine the legitimacy of the transfer. Cardiff City are pursuing what their lawyers consider natural justice as they believe the club has been wronged and in that case want compensation for losses incurred. It is no different from me suing a dodgy Gumtree seller that has not delivered to me the goods I paid for.
          I think you need to spend more time outside than inside the Birch!!

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Sala case

            Originally posted by pomeroy View Post
            You seem to miss the point completely. Cardiff City have already paid for the player and donated a significant sum to the Sala Trust Fund which significantly F C Nantes and the PFA declined to do so. The case revolves around whether Nantes in their dealings with Cardiff re. the Sala transfer employed an unlicenced agent which would be illegal in French law and materially determine the legitimacy of the transfer. Cardiff City are pursuing what their lawyers consider natural justice as they believe the club has been wronged and in that case want compensation for losses incurred. It is no different from me suing a dodgy Gumtree seller that has not delivered to me the goods I paid for.
            I think you need to spend more time outside than inside the Birch!!
            We were happy to deal with McKay and sign his two sons around that time, it is laughable that we are pursuing this like a dog with a bone on the back of that.

            Your analogy is not only crass but also incorrect. We signed the player, he was ours. He was “delivered”. The fact he chose to go back to Nantes to collect some belongings does not mean Nantes are suddenly responsible for the subsequent accident due to Sala accepting a less than glamorous private flight from someone who had acted for their club.

            Thanks for your concern but I have not touched alcohol in a number of years.

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Sala case

              Going to step away from this thread now, depressing to see it get to a point where people compare a young man passing away in the worst way possible to a car damaged in transit.

              David

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Sala case

                This thread was going off on a tangent until dml1954 corrected the whole point of this case. Clearly it took the Court cases against McKay to get the relevant proof that he was acting for Nantes who paid and arranged for the dodgy flight. Of course had the tragedy not happened nothing more would have been said but in the circumstances the club has a point and were right to pursue the matter.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Sala case

                  Originally posted by B. Oddie View Post
                  I feel very ashamed of the club.
                  Why? Kita and the agent are the ones who should be “ashamed”. This has nothing to do with fans of Cardiff and Nantes, just the 2 owners, one of whom is facing jail.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Sala case

                    Originally posted by TheBirchgrovePub View Post
                    We were happy to deal with McKay and sign his two sons around that time, it is laughable that we are pursuing this like a dog with a bone on the back of that.

                    Your analogy is not only crass but also incorrect. We signed the player, he was ours. He was “delivered”. The fact he chose to go back to Nantes to collect some belongings does not mean Nantes are suddenly responsible for the subsequent accident due to Sala accepting a less than glamorous private flight from someone who had acted for their club.

                    Thanks for your concern but I have not touched alcohol in a number of years.
                    FC Nantes are not responsible for anything, their dodgy owner is…he is despised in Nantes

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Sala case

                      Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                      I would imagine any other club in the same circumstances would do exactly the same thing as Tan is currently doing, regardless of the ethical considerations.

                      Can you think of any club that wouldn’t , apart from Swansea City of course. They would be too preoccupied taking legal action against their former manager.
                      Of course, they would and so would all the people saying it's not right if it was their money lost due to no fault of their own.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Sala case

                        Originally posted by dml1954 View Post
                        It has already been established in a separate case that Sala was City’s player at the time of his death. That is irrelevant in what is going on now. If Nantes and Mckay are found to have arranged the flight (which was illegal) and bearing in mind McKay was not a licensed agent in France at the time, then they were negligent and would be liable for City’s losses.
                        And if so partly responsible.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Sala case

                          Originally posted by dml1954 View Post
                          What is shameful is you continually quoting ‘facts’ that you have no idea whether they are true and using it to batter the club. If you bought an expensive car and paid for it in advance and then the garage arranged an unlicensed/illegal contractor to take it to you but it fell off the delivery lorry and was written off, you would sue the living daylights out of everybody you could to get your money back plus damages, loss of income, compensation and anything else your lawyer thought you could get. And yet, you expect us to believe that you would just shrug and say ‘cest la vie’ ? Nonsense.
                          Of course, he would, he'd be going mental if people were saying let it go don't worry about it why are you making a fuss, you're making me ashamed.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Sala case

                            Originally posted by light up the darkness View Post
                            The club have employed expert witness that states we would have had a 52-56% chance of staying up.iirc

                            The 100 million claim is probably an opportunity for Nantes to settle.

                            Either way Nantes are in trouble with the FFA
                            Not a great expert either I would say 97.576% it affected Warnock too, we would have stayed up easy.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Sala case

                              Originally posted by light up the darkness View Post
                              We have not heard yet about the role that Warnock played in terms of pushing through this transfer and his dealings with the illegal agents.

                              It could be that UEFA go after him for conspiracy

                              Anyway. Nantes have until September to respond
                              Nothing to do with him, he's just a Manager who recommends players to the board.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Sala case

                                Originally posted by pomeroy View Post
                                You seem to miss the point completely. Cardiff City have already paid for the player and donated a significant sum to the Sala Trust Fund which significantly F C Nantes and the PFA declined to do so. The case revolves around whether Nantes in their dealings with Cardiff re. the Sala transfer employed an unlicenced agent which would be illegal in French law and materially determine the legitimacy of the transfer. Cardiff City are pursuing what their lawyers consider natural justice as they believe the club has been wronged and in that case want compensation for losses incurred. It is no different from me suing a dodgy Gumtree seller that has not delivered to me the goods I paid for.
                                I think you need to spend more time outside than inside the Birch!!
                                :hehe: he's a WUM not a great one either!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X