Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Callum O'Dowda

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Callum O'Dowda

    Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    But your attempt doesn't tell the whole story. Here's an entirely alternative way of looking at O'Dowda's contribution this season:

    5 starts - 1 win, 1 draw, 3 defeats.

    5 sub appearances - 4 wins, 1 defeat.

    Let's break down these sub appearances:

    45 minutes vs Swansea - went from 1-0 down to lose 2-0
    15 minutes vs Ipswich - scores the winner
    12 minutes vs Bristol City - game already won
    6 minutes vs Huddersfield - game already won
    5 minutes vs Coventry - game already won.

    Ipswich apart, you could quite easily argue that O'Dowda's sub appearances have not contributed much to the result, other than just having some fresh legs on the pitch. When he's played 45 minutes or more we've won 1 out of 6. I wonder why he was dropped after the Sunderland defeat?

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Callum O'Dowda

      Originally posted by 2b2bdoo View Post
      Remember when fans could watch a player and decide if he’s any good and just give an honest personal opinion.

      Now all everyone wants to do is use stats to say this or say that or to tell someone else why they are wrong.
      Or give weight to why they think they are correct.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Callum O'Dowda

        You really are a sad little JR Eric sycophant aren't you

        He was murdered saying O'Dowda is sh1t when it was proved we score more points when he's involved.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Callum O'Dowda

          Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
          But your attempt doesn't tell the whole story. Here's an entirely alternative way of looking at O'Dowda's contribution this season:

          5 starts - 1 win, 1 draw, 3 defeats.

          5 sub appearances - 4 wins, 1 defeat.

          Let's break down these sub appearances:

          45 minutes vs Swansea - went from 1-0 down to lose 2-0
          15 minutes vs Ipswich - scores the winner
          12 minutes vs Bristol City - game already won
          6 minutes vs Huddersfield - game already won
          5 minutes vs Coventry - game already won.

          Ipswich apart, you could quite easily argue that O'Dowda's sub appearances have not contributed much to the result, other than just having some fresh legs on the pitch. When he's played 45 minutes or more we've won 1 out of 6. I wonder why he was dropped after the Sunderland defeat?
          I’m not sure he was “dropped” as such although after that performance anyone could have been dropped. With the Coventry game so close after the Sunderland game I don’t think anyone expected him to start again having not started in so long tbh.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Callum O'Dowda

            Originally posted by Dembe View Post
            Or give weight to why they think they are correct.
            That’s what this is, oh.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Callum O'Dowda

              O’Dowda’s a brilliant player. Three goals in 39 appearances last season. If we’d have had a wide player who could have scored three goals this season, we might have…

              Oh, hang on a minute.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Callum O'Dowda

                Originally posted by 2b2bdoo View Post
                I’m not sure he was “dropped” as such although after that performance anyone could have been dropped. With the Coventry game so close after the Sunderland game I don’t think anyone expected him to start again having not started in so long tbh.
                He wasn't Eric the half-glass empty is clutching at straws, wrong type of goals, only winning by one, now wrong type of appearances, he can't accept the facts and try's to find some more negative nonsense.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Callum O'Dowda

                  Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
                  O’Dowda’s a brilliant player. Three goals in 39 appearances last season. If we’d have had a wide player who could have scored three goals this season, we might have…

                  Oh, hang on a minute.
                  Didn’t he mostly play left back?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Callum O'Dowda

                    Originally posted by 2b2bdoo View Post
                    Didn’t he mostly play left back?
                    Yes, Collins was injured and he did a job for the team.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Callum O'Dowda

                      Originally posted by 2b2bdoo View Post
                      Didn’t he mostly play left back?
                      To be honest, I’ve no idea how many games he played in either position. He was anonymous much of the time. He’s one of those players. Moments of brilliance in some games, disappears in others. That’s probably why he’s spent most of his career in the middle of the Championship.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Callum O'Dowda

                        Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
                        To be honest, I’ve no idea how many games he played in either position. He was anonymous much of the time. He’s one of those players. Moments of brilliance in some games, disappears in others. That’s probably why he’s spent most of his career in the middle of the Championship.
                        Seems fair.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Callum O'Dowda

                          Originally posted by 2b2bdoo View Post
                          Seems fair.
                          Don’t get me wrong, I think O’Dowda’s alright, not a bad player by this division’s standards, but City123 hit the nail on the head earlier in the thread. The fact some people rave about him and suggest he’s been a big miss this season says more about the levels of mediocrity our fans have come to accept in recent years rather than the quality of the player himself.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Callum O'Dowda

                            Originally posted by North Cardiff Blue View Post
                            He wasn't Eric the half-glass empty is clutching at straws, wrong type of goals, only winning by one, now wrong type of appearances, he can't accept the facts and try's to find some more negative nonsense.
                            I'm suggesting O'Dowda doesn't deserve to be credited with the wins we've achieved when he's played only a few minutes, Ipswich apart. I think that's reasonable.

                            You said "He makes a difference and the results prove that". In 4 of his sub appearances he made absolutely no difference to the scoreline yet you're claiming that he was, in some part, responsible for results of games where he was on the field a few minutes. That's absolute nonsense.

                            Perhaps I'm nitpicking again, or just finding more nonsense in your arguments.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Callum O'Dowda

                              Originally posted by Rjk View Post
                              I remember a similar effect with Jack Wilshere at Arsenal, the longer he was out for, the more of an impact they were convinced he would make on his return
                              This! 💯

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Callum O'Dowda

                                Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
                                It happens all of the time My favourite 'It'll be like having a new player when (insert name) returns from injury. Wintle was Blackpools version of Pirlo when he was on loan up there. McGuiness's stock went up while on loan at Sheffield Wednesday. If Mark Harris continues to score goals then i'm taking cover, although i'm convinced some on here blame the club for Harris turning out to be ordinary, even though he played the best part of 100 league games.
                                To be fair regarding McGuinness, many were baffled he was loaned out at all (especially so we could bring in Jack Simpson ahead of him) and he was earning genuine rave reviews at Wednesday. He also did well when he came back in and was good for us this season up until his injury

                                I take the general point though, we're seeing the same now with Adams. He's a trier and I think he's been unfortunate with his injuries since joining the club, but a Championship-level footballer he is not

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X