David Wilkie

[Cleve van Leef]

R.I.P.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/swimming/articles/c3ggndekv8lo

Another youngster gone..

[Undercoverinwurzelland]

Re: David Wilkie

R.I.P.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/swimming/articles/c3ggndekv8lo

Another youngster gone..

Only 70.
He came to our school once. I've got a photo of myself with him. Seemed like a nice guy.

[pipster]

Re: David Wilkie

Only 70.
He came to our school once. I've got a photo of myself with him. Seemed like a nice guy.

I remember him and that big moustache, ironically followed by Duncan Goodhuw - who had no hair whatsoever

[bobh]

Re: David Wilkie

Fecking cancer, horrible affliction on the human race.

[ToTaL ITK]

Re: David Wilkie

Fecking cancer, horrible affliction on the human race.

this x a million

[xsnaggle]

Re: David Wilkie

[QUOTE=ToTaL ITK;5513051]this x a million[/QUOTTWT

Tel me about it :cry:

[the other bob wilson]

Re: David Wilkie

Hard to believe for anyone who has only known the post lottery funding haul of medals every four years, but David Wilkie’s gold was one of only three won by the UK at the 1976 Olympics in Montreal - Brendan Foster’s bronze was the only medal won in athletics in what was this country’s worst Olympics since I started watching them in 1964.

That’s why his name was probably the first I would have thought of if asked to name a British swimming Olympic gold medalist - another of the iconic sportsmen of my youth gone.

RIP

[The Bloop]

Re: David Wilkie

His stood out as we won very few Olympic medals back then, especially gold.
I can still recall Alan Weekes commentary 'And it's Wilkie' and bizarrely his winning time of 2:15:11.
Think these days the women are faster than that and the men are just over 2 mins for the same event.

[Moodybluebird]

Re: David Wilkie

His stood out as we won very few Olympic medals back then, especially gold.
I can still recall Alan Weekes commentary 'And it's Wilkie' and bizarrely his winning time of 2:15:11.
Think these days the women are faster than that and the men are just over 2 mins for the same event.

Due to the huge leap forward in training methods and taking a more scientific approach preparing swimmers for competition, you can't compare times set then with the current standards.

The greatest swimmer of that era was probably Mark Spitz of the USA. His world records for the 100m and 200m freestyle are now 4 and 8 seconds slower than those set by the current British record holders !