Selling out ?

[NYCBlue]

Re: Selling out ?

No-one is offering 6m for Vaulks

He's 27. I don't know if he would fare better in a different system or with a different manager or whether he would shine in League 1, but I don't think he's good enough to play for us under MM if we're serious about getting promoted. I can't see how anyone could believe he's a £6M player.

[life on mars]

Re: Selling out ?

Vaulks 6 million really 🤣

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Selling out ?

Nobody thought that we were going to sign Harry Wilson permanently, did they?

Surely the only chance we ever had of signing him permanently was if we had gone up?

[Hilts]

Re: Selling out ?

No one is paying 1m for Vaulks let alone 6.

I think a significant enough bid for Moore will come in.

[Dorcus]

Re: Selling out ?

No one is paying 1m for Vaulks let alone 6.

I think a significant enough bid for Moore will come in.

No one in their right mind would pay more than a round of drinks for him! And I'm talking Wetherspoon prices, not night club prices.

[surge]

Re: Selling out ?

Vaulks would be valued as a top half championship footballer unlikely to make it to premier league level, but this is a window where no one is expected to pay much on transfer fees.

I don't think we'll get any offers in for him, Pack or Bacuna. Or many of our players really.

That means we're more likely to sell those who can drum up interest: Moore, Ralls...Colwill?

[RonnieBird]

Re: Selling out ?

Nobody thought that we were going to sign Harry Wilson permanently, did they?

Might well have done if things had turned out differently.
Two managers were equipped with luxury players but failed to exploit that. With these players they should have walked into the playoffs comfortably and if they’d have been promoted we would have probably kept all the loan players and added to them.

No. This is the opposite to when Sir Neil achieved it with a budget playing staff and although we’re not the third rate outfit some here portray us as, nor are we one of the huge “super league “ type clubs who can throw endless millions into a money pit and not expect results.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Selling out ?

Might well have done if things had turned out differently.
Two managers were equipped with luxury players but failed to exploit that. With these players they should have walked into the playoffs comfortably and if they’d have been promoted we would have probably kept all the loan players and added to them.

No. This is the opposite to when Sir Neil achieved it with a budget playing staff and although we’re not the third rate outfit some here portray us as, nor are we one of the huge “super league “ type clubs who can throw endless millions into a money pit and not expect results.

That's the "budget" playing staff that had one player who cost more than the sum total of what we've spent this season is it?