Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Goalkeeper performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Goalkeeper performance

    20250428_112436.jpg

    not sure what this is based on, probably xG faced Vs goals conceded or something along those lines.

    but doesn't look too great for either of our keepers really.

    if we had a gk performing like Plymouth's has we wouldn't be anywhere near the bottom 3

  • #2
    Re: Goalkeeper performance

    Originally posted by Rjk View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]6527[/ATTACH]

    not sure what this is based on, probably xG faced Vs goals conceded or something along those lines.

    but doesn't look too great for either of our keepers really.

    if we had a gk performing like Plymouth's has we wouldn't be anywhere near the bottom 3
    Both dodgy at times , I would like a new one, but wherre are we going to get a better one to play in L1.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Goalkeeper performance

      Freddie woodman is available on a free, but hasn't been much better

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Goalkeeper performance

        I used to think Alnwick was a damn good keeper at this level but must have been wrong - the computer says so..

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Goalkeeper performance

          Originally posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
          I used to think Alnwick was a damn good keeper at this level but must have been wrong - the computer says so..
          he's close to the average in both metrics - although obviously how the team defends will have a big impact on things like the crosses that the keepers can cut out

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Goalkeeper performance

            Thought Horvarth had a good game on Saturday, but there were still a couple of dodgy moments from him, don’t suppose they’ll ever go away.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Goalkeeper performance

              i,m pretty sure Horvarth won't be with us next season

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Goalkeeper performance

                Originally posted by Rjk View Post
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]6527[/ATTACH]

                not sure what this is based on, probably xG faced Vs goals conceded or something along those lines.

                but doesn't look too great for either of our keepers really.

                if we had a gk performing like Plymouth's has we wouldn't be anywhere near the bottom 3
                Wouldn't be near the bottom 3? That's a crazy statement to make, you reckon a goalkeeper can be worth 8 or 9 places in a league table alone? Madness.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Goalkeeper performance

                  Originally posted by MOZZER2 View Post
                  i,m pretty sure Horvarth won't be with us next season
                  We don’t need him, Alnwick will be adequate and we can get a younger back up keeper. Big question is can we move Horvath on, I would imagine he’s one of the higher wage earners

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Goalkeeper performance

                    Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
                    Wouldn't be near the bottom 3? That's a crazy statement to make, you reckon a goalkeeper can be worth 8 or 9 places in a league table alone? Madness.
                    yeah it was a bit of an exaggeration... however
                    taking this chart at face value (with standard disclaimer that I don't know the source of where they've arrived at that metric+ it presumably doesn't consider team effects etc) they reckon that Connor Hazard prevents 0.6 goals per 90 more than Ethan Horvarth (and faces more difficult shots on average as well)
                    over the course of a full season that would mean we'd concede 27 fewer goals - that would give us a positive goal difference, and probably put us mid tableish.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Goalkeeper performance

                      Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                      Thought Horvarth had a good game on Saturday, but there were still a couple of dodgy moments from him, don’t suppose they’ll ever go away.
                      That's why he's a championship goalkeeper

                      I stand by the opinion that these players are better than the table suggests and we should have never have gone down, and as for goalkeepers they're also better than League One

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Goalkeeper performance

                        I think Hovarth is shite and puts the bejesus up me with the ball at his feet.
                        Which if I remember correctly was the reason Bulut got him in.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Goalkeeper performance

                          Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
                          That's why he's a championship goalkeeper

                          I stand by the opinion that these players are better than the table suggests and we should have never have gone down, and as for goalkeepers they're also better than League One
                          He’s nowhere near a championship goalie. If he’s still here next season I will be distraught.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Goalkeeper performance

                            The weak link in a team of weak links.
                            He was horrendous at Burnley first game of the season.. Should have known then what was going to happen

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Goalkeeper performance

                              talking of goalkeepers Norwich are releasing Angus Gunn on a free in the summer

                              would be a good option for us me thinks

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X