Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lee Dixon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lee Dixon

    Impressed with his co-commentary. He doesn't fall into the banal banter usually forced down our throats and says it as it is without droning on. Sam Matter-of-fact isn't brilliant (very scripted commentary with usual tedious "facts") but better than Tyldesley and definitely Jonathan Pearce.

  • #2
    Re: Lee Dixon

    Originally posted by Dorcus View Post
    Impressed with his co-commentary. He doesn't fall into the banal banter usually forced down our throats and says it as it is without droning on. Sam Matter-of-fact isn't brilliant (very scripted commentary with usual tedious "facts") but better than Tyldesley and definitely Jonathan Pearce.
    I don't listen to any of them, the TV is on mute if i watch a game on my own. So ****ing boring.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Lee Dixon

      Originally posted by Dorcus View Post
      Impressed with his co-commentary. He doesn't fall into the banal banter usually forced down our throats and says it as it is without droning on. Sam Matter-of-fact isn't brilliant (very scripted commentary with usual tedious "facts") but better than Tyldesley and definitely Jonathan Pearce.
      Agree with all of that. I've always liked Dixon as a pundit, and Matterface isn't as bad as the others.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Lee Dixon

        Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
        I don't listen to any of them, the TV is on mute if i watch a game on my own. So ****ing boring.
        I totally agree, even the better "commentators" are shit; David Coleman was my favourite. I only wish you could have the option of turning off the commentary and listen to just the crowd noise.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Lee Dixon

          Originally posted by Dorcus View Post
          I totally agree, even the better "commentators" are shit; David Coleman was my favourite. I only wish you could have the option of turning off the commentary and listen to just the crowd noise.
          Yup, i'm always amazed at how so many people put an emphasis of importance on Commentary or co commentary. I can appreciate good knowledge of the game etc, but i'd rather just get on with watching the game and coming to my own conclusions without having to listen to a couple of people state the obvious (in most cases)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Lee Dixon

            Originally posted by Dorcus View Post
            Impressed with his co-commentary. He doesn't fall into the banal banter usually forced down our throats and says it as it is without droning on. Sam Matter-of-fact isn't brilliant (very scripted commentary with usual tedious "facts") but better than Tyldesley and definitely Jonathan Pearce.
            I feel Matterface is always one step behind the game and wouldn't get a look in at the BBC. The rest of ITV's commentary team (not the pundits) are shite.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Lee Dixon

              Hartson is the worst for stating the bleeding obvious

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Lee Dixon

                Michael Owen is the worst commentator to have ever lived. So f**kin boring.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Lee Dixon

                  Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
                  Yup, i'm always amazed at how so many people put an emphasis of importance on Commentary or co commentary. I can appreciate good knowledge of the game etc, but i'd rather just get on with watching the game and coming to my own conclusions without having to listen to a couple of people state the obvious (in most cases)
                  If you think footballs bad listen to Adam Smith commenting on boxing. Utterly abysmal.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Lee Dixon

                    Quest have better commentators than ITV although I don't mind Joe Speight. Matterface should have stuck to Sky Sports News as he's not a very good commentator.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Lee Dixon

                      Lee Dixon is one of the main co-commentators on US EPL coverage. I think he's great. He's really down-to-earth and gives a really good insight into what a pro is thinking/feeling.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Lee Dixon

                        Originally posted by NYCBlue View Post
                        Lee Dixon is one of the main co-commentators on US EPL coverage. I think he's great. He's really down-to-earth and gives a really good insight into what a pro is thinking/feeling.
                        He’s excellent on their coverage. His insight is nearly always informative. I’ve not heard anyone better

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Lee Dixon

                          Originally posted by Hilts View Post
                          If you think footballs bad listen to Adam Smith commenting on boxing. Utterly abysmal.
                          Absolutely, he can see what nobody else can, Biased to Hearn fighters, although that's about to end as Hearn hasn't taken up the option of a new Sky contract.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Lee Dixon

                            I'll raise you Owen Hargreaves

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Lee Dixon

                              He’s not great. He was trying to banter with McCoist during the England Scotland match and it was cringe. I think he’s boring anyway.

                              It’s the poorest set of commentators I can remember.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X