If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Next match: Pre-season. Saturday, July 11th | FC Midtjylland (H) @ Cardiff City Stadium, 12:30pm -
All pre-season fixtures
She’s very knowledgable and well prepared but is dominating the commentating way too much. Every action doesn’t need a full technical analysis. Just let the pictures tell the story sometimes. Maybe trying a bit too hard to show she’s worthy of the job.
I’d rather listen to her before many of her male counterparts though.
I agree entirely with your first paragraph. In the end it was a relief when the match ended due to her constant jabbering and analysis of every single situation. No co-commentator, no matter how knowledgeable, should be allowed to dominate in the way she does. A painful experience for most if not all viewers.
She obviously knows her stuff,but its only her opinion. Recently football a game played by testosterone fuelled egotistical young men has turned into a nerdy science. Its always whether one team can impose their game over the opposition. Spain were always going to try to push their full backs as high as they could and Croatia were keeping it compact and wait for the mistake.
The problem with her was she spoke so often she often contradicted whatever she said 5 mins earlier.
How come i grew up with a single commentator and never thought i needed someone to tell me what to think. Maybe to tell me what is happening off the ball who is making runs the camera is not picking up.
She talked too much, but do we really need them ?
Stats and data analysis have been part of the game for longer than you realise. She is a manager after all, so her insight is going to be much different to the likes of Jenas and Murphy who probably haven't got a coaching badge between them.
She talks way too much and can't pronounce Azpilicueta properly. Sure the insight is nice but it's not needed every minute but if she improves on that I think I'd much rather her than any of Jenas/Murphy etc
She may know her onions football wise, but her constant wittering is driving me nuts. Don't these people realise that less is more, instead of beating your eardrums into submission.
As I said in a previous thread, she sounds like Glenn Hoddle, has the same poor pronunciation as Hoddle and I'm sure like Hoddle believes she's a tactical genius.
Tuerto has the right attitude. Press the mute button or at the very least turn down the sound to its bare minimum.
I happen to think that her monotone delivery is absolutely awful. She might be very insightful but you have to make what you are saying sound interesting by using your voice. She has zero intonation and makes everything sound so unbelievably boring.
Btw, almost everyone on Twitter thinks that she is fantastic!
I happen to think that her monotone delivery is absolutely awful. She might be very insightful but you have to make what you are saying sound interesting by using your voice. She has zero intonation and makes everything sound so unbelievably boring.
Btw, almost everyone on Twitter thinks that she is fantastic!
It was absolute torture listening to her two hour monologue delivered in an incessant London/South East drone. Practically every kick was followed by some form of technical analysis that was neither insightful nor necessary. A horrible experience for the viewer that tarnished an otherwise fantastic match.
Your last comment regarding Twitter has left me speechless !
She’s very knowledgable and well prepared but is dominating the commentating way too much. Every action doesn’t need a full technical analysis. Just let the pictures tell the story sometimes. Maybe trying a bit too hard to show she’s worthy of the job.
I’d rather listen to her before many of her male counterparts though.
I completely agree with you there, right down to the bit about her possibly trying too hard. I can understand it in a way mind because there will be some female co commentators who will think that, with a lot of the opinions you see from men on places like this and other social media platforms when it comes to woman in football broadcasting, they have to really prove how much they know and understand the game. Emma Hayes doesn't need to prattle on endlessly like she did yesterday, because what she says is, very often, interesting and informative - less is more would be a good motto for her I believe.
Also think Jayne Ludlow has been honest and intelligent on those Elis James programmes.
I am still at a loss as to what playing low means.
The nearest thing I can think is playing deep but that is used so much why would she not just say deep rather than low?
Another comment from her about balls being like balloons had me shaking my head for a while too.
Comment