Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    Excellent 8th wicket stand and at 228/7 this is a decent effort.

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      Bloody typical, I discover the stream is working again and the first thing I see is Douthwaite being bowled! 254-8, a really good partnership which should mean we've at least posted a competitive score.

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        310-8 at the close, Hogan forty not out, VanDerGuyten eighty not out. Very good first day for us.

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
          310-8 at the close, Hogan forty not out, VanDerGuyten eighty not out. Very good first day for us.
          Thanks for posting the link Paul. Flitting in and out during the day but just had to watch the final hour with Hogan batting because he always goes for it. An excellent recovery. Hogan is 40 next month. What a signing he proved to be.

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
            166-7 at tea, I suppose the target now is 200 and a bonus point.
            310/8 Van de Gugten's 80 not out his best ever apparently.


            Good recovery.

            It looked bloody cold there mind!

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              Yes a good recovery.

              BUT, we’ve relied on our lower order to bail us out far too many times over the last few seasons.

              Just like City’s inability to develop any central midfielders of real quality over the years, Glammy have the same issue with opening batsmen!

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                .........and numbers three, four, five and so on.

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  Originally posted by Aubrey Boyce View Post
                  Yes a good recovery.

                  BUT, we’ve relied on our lower order to bail us out far too many times over the last few seasons.

                  Just like City’s inability to develop any central midfielders of real quality over the years, Glammy have the same issue with opening batsmen!
                  To be fair, I think opening the batting has become a much more difficult job in the last decade or so.

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    i think thats not bad at all after the start ,

                    soon tell when yorkshire have a go later

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Yorkshire 31-2 in reply to Glamorgan's 330 - a couple of wickets for Hogan who got to 54 this morning.

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                        Yorkshire 31-2 in reply to Glamorgan's 330 - a couple of wickets for Hogan who got to 54 this morning.
                        Wonderful start to the season from the vet.

                        It'll be just our luck he'll get called up for the Aussies!

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          Yorkshire 68-2 at lunch.

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            Absolutely fantastic so far. Hoped we'd have a good result, but didn't think we'd be bossing the game at this stage. Still a long way to go, but a win here would be fantastic.

                            We've got the best player in the world arriving from game 5 onwards, and a very decent all rounder in neser aswell.
                            My hope was that after 4 games we would be close enough to the pace to kick on. A win here will set us up fantastically.

                            Edit:
                            Should caveat this with the obvious. This is Glamorgan and they're bound to find a way to mess this up!!

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              129-5, but it’s worth remembering that we were 130-7.

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                5 down now. For 129. Timm wasn't happy with 85 runs. He's picked up a wicket aswell

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X