GLAMMY

[Llanedeyrnblue]

Re: GLAMMY

Century for Rudolf as he and Cooke (80not out) lead the rescue

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41333

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

Century for Rudolf as he and Cooke (80not out) lead the rescue


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41333

Looks like lifting the burden of captaincy off Rudolph is paying dividends. Our middle order is still a worry mind.
Heartening though after an awful start to the season, even by our own standards.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Looks like lifting the burden of captaincy off Rudolph is paying dividends. Our middle order is still a worry mind.
Heartening though after an awful start to the season, even by our own standards.

Yes good point about Rudolph. In the circs that is a great century. I am really pleased to see Cooke is now finally proving what a talented batsman he is.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Cricket really can be a strange game. Last night Glamorgan went from coasting at 39-0 to blitzed at 58-6 in the space of nine overs. Then I wake up this morning and see what the overhead conditions were going to be like at Worcester and think we'll do well to get a hundred - shows what I know!

Great effort by Rudolph and Cooke today.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Cooke and Rudolph both out quickly - 227-8, but we're not going to be too far behind and could still get a small lead.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

304-8 at tea - fair play, we're all quick to criticise when things go wrong for Glamorgan, but they've been tremendous today.

[Llanedeyrnblue]

Re: GLAMMY

What a turn around in this game, they're playing as a team, everyone's chipping in with decent performances. As said above in the thread Rudolph seems to love not having the captaincy.Its a pity that Cooke never reached his hundred.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41333

[The Alien]

Re: GLAMMY

It's a bit of a topsy turvy league this season. Looking like bottom placed Durham will beat title chasing Kent.

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

304-8 at tea - fair play, we're all quick to criticise when things go wrong for Glamorgan, but they've been tremendous today.

^^^
How many times do we outplay teams in the field only for the opposition to record record partnerships for the 9th and 10th wickets?
Refreshing to see our tail wag for a change and it can only be good for the confidence of the team moving forward.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

A superb day. Need to take early wickets tomorrow though.

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

A superb day. Need to take early wickets tomorrow though.

Well its a good start, Captain Hogie fired up taking wicket straight away 56-2

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Well its a good start, Captain Hogie fired up taking wicket straight away 56-2

Ned two or three more before lunch. I wouldn't us to be chasing more than 200

[BlueToujours]

Re: GLAMMY

Ned two or three more before lunch. I wouldn't us to be chasing more than 200

How about Worcestershire 119-6 leading by 5 with 4 wickets remaining!!! Is this all down to a change of Captain??

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

How about Worcestershire 119-6 leading by 5 with 4 wickets remaining!!! Is this all down to a change of Captain??

No doubt in my mind.
Though as I've alluded to earlier in the thread, the Glambags are notoriously guilty of not polishing the tail off sides when in decent positions.
Conditions must be favouring the fielding side, Pearcey mentioned 200 but I wouldn't want to be chasing down three figures!

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

No doubt in my mind.
Though as I've alluded to earlier in the thread, the Glambags are notoriously guilty of not polishing the tail off sides when in decent positions.
Conditions must be favouring the fielding side, Pearcey mentioned 200 but I wouldn't want to be chasing down three figures!

In truth nor would I.Lets get these final four wickets in the afternoon session