Antonio-West Ham

[splott parker]

Heard on 5live yesterday that he wanted one goal to become West Ham’s leading top division scorer. On the news this morning they’re making a big deal of it........Another 200 and he’ll catch Geoff Hurst up.........when was it when football started?

[BlueArmy 86]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

HE’S WEST HAMS ALL TIME pl TOP SCORER

You could argue Di Canio was their Premiership top scorer and he was their Premier League one already..

[Sunnysideup]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

I take my hat off to him
Outstanding display last night
He’s a bull of a bloke - strong- fast and scares defences to death and a fan’s favourite 🤩
We’d all love a player like that in our team!! ⚽️⚽️

[Wash DC Blue]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

He comes across as a top bloke as well.
Really pleased to see him doing well.

[MacAdder]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Heard on 5live yesterday that he wanted one goal to become West Ham’s leading top division scorer. On the news this morning they’re making a big deal of it........Another 200 and he’ll catch Geoff Hurst up.........when was it when football started?

The Premier league is a brand which they and Sky have always touting.

I understand it all from a business perspective but it does mock the legends from the past.

I doubt Geoff himself is best pleased with it all.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

The Premier league is a brand which they and Sky have always touting.

I understand it all from a business perspective but it does mock the legends from the past.

I doubt Geoff himself is best pleased with it all.

I doubt Vic Watson with 326 goals is pleased Geoff Hurst gets all the praise either


"List of West Ham United F.C. records and statistics - Wikipedia" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...and_statistics

[The Lone Gunman]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Heard on 5live yesterday that he wanted one goal to become West Ham’s leading top division scorer.

Did they actually say the top division or did they say the Premier League?

I'm betting the latter.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Did they actually say the top division or did they say the Premier League?

I'm betting the latter.

Yep...

A whole load of fuss over nothing really.

[NYCBlue]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Heard on 5live yesterday that he wanted one goal to become West Ham’s leading top division scorer. On the news this morning they’re making a big deal of it........Another 200 and he’ll catch Geoff Hurst up.........when was it when football started?

I thought the same thing when I was watching the post-game yesterday. NBC switched to Sky coverage for a bit. I mean good on him, but it's like Sky is trying to "cancel" football before 1992. He seems like a good bloke but all that fuss about 49 goals in 6 seasons is ridiculous.

[splott parker]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Yep...

A whole load of fuss over nothing really.

Didn’t watch BBC breakfast news this morning then, they said ‘top division’ as well as 5Live yesterday teatime. But you’ll argue different of course.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Didn’t watch BBC breakfast news this morning then, they said ‘top division’ as well as 5Live yesterday teatime. But you’ll argue different of course.

Would be stupid to argue back on a programme I didn't watch or listen to.

[Eric the Half a Bee]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

That means that Jordon Mutch is our all time leading PL scorer.

It may be of interest to note that we've had 5 players who have scored 5 or more goals in the PL for us. Frazier Campbell netted 6. The other 5 were midfielders or defenders (Mutch, Camarasa, Reid (rarely used as a striker) and Caulker).

[splott parker]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Would be stupid to argue back on a programme I didn't watch or listen to.

Why did you reply ‘Yep’ to TLG then

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Why did you reply ‘Yep’ to TLG then

Because they are talking about the PL era, not all time.

And I wanted to.

[Allez Allez Allez]

Re: Antonio-West Ham

Because they are talking about the PL era, not all time.

And I wanted to.

Who are? The people on the tv and radio that you already admitted you didn't watch and wouldn't argue against but are now arguing against?