Tom Sang?

[PhyllisStant]

Re: Tom Sang?

Totally agree with the idea of sang in midfield and Bacuna at wing back. Get Pack and Sang in midfield so we can actually pass the ball. Bacon can provide a bit of width and energy from wing back. Perry Ng can get into left wing back then

I've heard his form can be a bit streaky.

[blue lewj]

Re: Tom Sang?

I've heard his form can be a bit streaky.

If there is a rasher player then I've not seen him.

[life on mars]

Re: Tom Sang?

I believe these youngsters currently in our squad are good enough for this level,but they need to play for the right manager and the right style.

Steve Morrison

[binman]

Re: Tom Sang?

Sang in the center. He can play.
Ng at FULL BACK. He's not a winger.
Mcguiness at center half with Mozza. The other two are useless.
Give Zimba a go up top with Moore. We desperately need pace.
Evans on the right and Giles on the left. We need width.

If we go down trying to play then f*ck it. I can't stand this rubbish any more. Last nights team selection was pathetic.

This

If they are to go again with the same personnel and same tactics we may as well give up now just like we did before the game last night
Vaulks isn't a bad player - he's just not good enough at this level to play him alongside Pack is just lunacy like playing Flint and Morrison in a back 4
Nelson and Flint are always going to cost us goals and will ALWAYS give the ball away.
Those 3 must go straight away

I know its a results business but enough is enough of this crap. We can still be direct but No pace, No width, No Control, No passing, will lead to relegation. Mick is not stupid - He knows the game - I've no idea what was going through his head last night

[chrisp_1927]

Re: Tom Sang?

I've heard his form can be a bit streaky.

His missus is pig ugly

[The Hooded Claw]

Re: Tom Sang?

I've heard his form can be a bit streaky.

I’ve heard that’s porkies.

[Cyncoed Slumdog]

Re: Tom Sang?

I've heard his form can be a bit streaky.

Is he Danish?