Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle Rittenhouse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

    Wasn't one of the lads chasing him have a gun ??

    The other wanted to smash him up with a skateboard.

    He In a stupid country that (allows ) someone to carry a weapon for self defence purposes decided to use it as he was being chased down with intent to injure or even kill ??

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

      Just watched the item about this chap on the BBC TV news. Not an ounce of humility, just a rather smug "look at me, I'm famous" expression on his face. I think he needs to keep his head down for a wee while as I'm sure there must be some gun-toting individuals who would just love to goad him into a confrontation so that they too can kill with impunity by claiming self defence. Wouldn't that be ironic.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

        Originally posted by Gofer Blue View Post
        Just watched the item about this chap on the BBC TV news. Not an ounce of humility, just a rather smug "look at me, I'm famous" expression on his face. I think he needs to keep his head down for a wee while as I'm sure there must be some gun-toting individuals who would just love to goad him into a confrontation so that they too can kill with impunity by claiming self defence. Wouldn't that be ironic.
        If he rocks up in Llanrumney with that attitude he's for it .

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

          Originally posted by Gofer Blue View Post
          Just watched the item about this chap on the BBC TV news. Not an ounce of humility, just a rather smug "look at me, I'm famous" expression on his face. I think he needs to keep his head down for a wee while as I'm sure there must be some gun-toting individuals who would just love to goad him into a confrontation so that they too can kill with impunity by claiming self defence. Wouldn't that be ironic.
          Irony? Not a chance, not a single witness account or footage of the event shows he goaded any of the three people shot.

          First guy was looking for a fight all night, why he got into a confrontation with Rittenhouse I don't know, but going off of footage of before the shooting I'd bet the nonce was the aggressor. He chased Rittenhouse and tried to grab his gun, you can't do that and expect to not get shot.

          Second and third guys thought they were responding to an active shooter, I have sympathy for them both but neither were goaded into attacking Rittenhouse, they acted off of false information and both attacked him, one even pulled a gun on him.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

            His first tv interview is with Tucker Carlson, not exactly a conciliatory move. Presumably so he can play up to a hard right audience.


            The trumpite mob seem to think its heroic to sh*t yourself, run away and then pull a trigger

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

              Originally posted by chrisp_1927 View Post

              The trumpite mob seem to think its heroic to sh*t yourself, run away and then pull a trigger
              That's a very harsh way of putting it. Regardless of what you think of Kyle or America's gun laws, it was obvious self-defence and a lot more people could've been a lot more reckless. Regardless of whether you think he should've been there or not, he was only 16 ffs.

              In general, he was clearly not guilty. Anyone who followed this case and looked at the evidence for themselves would realise it should never have gotten to court in the first place. He was chased down and assaulted, and the prosecution's key witness admitted he only got shot after he pointed a gun at him.

              The media have yet again shown how utterly disgraceful they are in this case. I hope Kyle sues them in to oblivion for the way they've reported on this case.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                Originally posted by Tokyo Blue View Post
                That's a very harsh way of putting it. Regardless of what you think of Kyle or America's gun laws, it was obvious self-defence and a lot more people could've been a lot more reckless. Regardless of whether you think he should've been there or not, he was only 16 ffs.

                In general, he was clearly not guilty. Anyone who followed this case and looked at the evidence for themselves would realise it should never have gotten to court in the first place. He was chased down and assaulted, and the prosecution's key witness admitted he only got shot after he pointed a gun at him.

                The media have yet again shown how utterly disgraceful they are in this case. I hope Kyle sues them in to oblivion for the way they've reported on this case.
                If you read any of my posts on the subject of his guilt , you will see i believe firmly it was self defence.
                That has nothing to do with this particular comment. The trump types are now lauding him as a hero which is quite frankly ridiculous. To give the first interview to Tucker Carlson is an inflammatory move as far as I'm concerned.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                  Originally posted by jimmyscoular View Post
                  A caricature, of course. Shooting someone while engaging in an argument will get you life in jail, if you escape the death penalty. Shoot someone, however, who has already declared his intention to kill you should he find you alone, and finds himself in precisely that circumstance and is lunging at you; or who is kicking your head in or beating you about the head with a skateboard and is himself armed, well, then, you may act to prevent yourself from death or imminent bodily harm.

                  Is this not the law in Britain?
                  Didn't he cross state lines with a gun, how old was he again?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                    Originally posted by Llandaff Blue View Post
                    Irony? Not a chance, not a single witness account or footage of the event shows he goaded any of the three people shot.

                    First guy was looking for a fight all night, why he got into a confrontation with Rittenhouse I don't know, but going off of footage of before the shooting I'd bet the nonce was the aggressor. He chased Rittenhouse and tried to grab his gun, you can't do that and expect to not get shot.

                    Second and third guys thought they were responding to an active shooter, I have sympathy for them both but neither were goaded into attacking Rittenhouse, they acted off of false information and both attacked him, one even pulled a gun on him.
                    I would have thought the said Mr. Rittenhouse might have shown some signs of remorse over what happened rather than the rather smug attitude he adopted in front of the cameras. If it were me I would have been physically sick knowing that I had killed two people whether in self defence or otherwise. Surely we have to question why he went out with a loaded gun in the first place unless he intended to use it at some point. It seems to me his motive was that of a vigilante, so either he would be prepared to kill someone in defence of someone else or himself. I guess it's the "American way". BTW I see he has taken my advice and is keeping his head down - I wonder why!

                    "Mr Rittenhouse is now in an undisclosed location, a spokesman for his family told CBS".
                    Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59358172

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                      Originally posted by dembethewarrior View Post
                      Didn't he cross state lines with a gun, how old was he again?
                      Apparently he was at his friend's house in Kenosha.
                      That's where the guns were kept.

                      His friends father bought the gun for him and kept it in his gun safe.

                      Mad video this is.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                        Originally posted by dembethewarrior View Post
                        Didn't he cross state lines with a gun, how old was he again?
                        Exactly - no one drives into another city with an assault rifle because they want to protect a H&M.
                        He did so cos he wanted to light someone up and obviously in an angry mob he’ll get that opportunity. If everyone had this little pricks mentality it would have been an absolute bloodbath

                        And what if he was black? he probably would have been shot on sight for just holding the Damn rifle

                        America is f**ked - this kid should’ve gone down for 20-30 years

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                          Originally posted by Wash DC Blue View Post
                          Apparently he was at his friend's house in Kenosha.
                          That's where the guns were kept.

                          His friends father bought the gun for him and kept it in his gun safe.

                          Mad video this is.

                          https://youtu.be/tkTnQfjRvk0
                          That's That's good video.

                          Shows a lot of stuff, which may not have happened had an underage kid not been let loose with a deadly weapon.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                            Originally posted by Kitman View Post
                            Exactly - no one drives into another city with an assault rifle because they want to protect a H&M.
                            He did so cos he wanted to light someone up and obviously in an angry mob he’ll get that opportunity. If everyone had this little pricks mentality it would have been an absolute bloodbath

                            And what if he was black? he probably would have been shot on sight for just holding the Damn rifle

                            America is f**ked - this kid should’ve gone down for 20-30 years
                            20-30 years for what? He was attacked by all three of the people he shot and was unconfrontational during the protest. If he was some deranged killer who wanted to cause a mass causality event he wouldn't have stopped shooting after the third guy was shot.

                            You're right to question his motives, I have myself. But that doesn't change the fact he was attacked multiple times and rightly defended himself, it's nothing to do with race and honestly the misinformation surrounding the trial is concerning.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                              Originally posted by Llandaff Blue View Post
                              20-30 years for what? He was attacked by all three of the people he shot and was unconfrontational during the protest. If he was some deranged killer who wanted to cause a mass causality event he wouldn't have stopped shooting after the third guy was shot.

                              You're right to question his motives, I have myself. But that doesn't change the fact he was attacked multiple times and rightly defended himself, it's nothing to do with race and honestly the misinformation surrounding the trial is concerning.
                              If he didn't have a gun he wouldn't have shot anyone.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

                                Originally posted by Llandaff Blue View Post
                                20-30 years for what? He was attacked by all three of the people he shot and was unconfrontational during the protest. If he was some deranged killer who wanted to cause a mass causality event he wouldn't have stopped shooting after the third guy was shot.

                                You're right to question his motives, I have myself. But that doesn't change the fact he was attacked multiple times and rightly defended himself, it's nothing to do with race and honestly the misinformation surrounding the trial is concerning.
                                Why did he have to go there with a gun if had peaceful motives.
                                He went there to confront and kill .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X