Maxwell guilty

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Maxwell guilty

I’ve got Life on Mars down as a Stanley Unwin impersonator.

https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?444574-The-Hillary-Clinton-thread&highlight=virginia+roberts

You might have thought, given LoM's previous comments on the "innocence" of Prince Andrew's accuser that he would avoid this subject like the plague...... still moth to a flame and all that!

[Dorcus]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Not a clue, but it brightens the day

There's a unique poetry to it; reminds me of James Joyce's Ulysses.

[jon1959]

Re: Maxwell guilty

There's a unique poetry to it; reminds me of James Joyce's Ulysses.

Oh FFS!

Now I've got a mental picture of LOM as Molly Bloom!

What was wrong with Stanley Unwin?

[Dorcus]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Oh FFS!

Now I've got a mental picture of LOM as Molly Bloom!

What was wrong with Stanley Unwin?

Ha ha, LOM a Man For All Seasons

[life on mars]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Not a clue, but it brightens the day

It don't half get folk going 😄.

I'd lock em all up .

Let's not fool ourselves Prince Andrew , Clinton, Trump ,Gates and many more were close to these awful people, all enjoyed his perverse World, what I'd like to see is the same cases brought against all , not just pathetic Prince Andrew , sadly that won't happen as the Americans listed are much more powerful than Prince Andrew .

That is my point its not complicated.👍

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Maxwell guilty

It don't half get folk going ��.

I'd lock em all up .

Let's not fool ourselves Prince Andrew , Clinton, Trump ,Gates and many more were close to these awful people, all enjoyed his perverse World, what I'd like to see is the same cases brought against all , not just pathetic Prince Andrew , sadly that won't happen as the Americans listed are much more powerful than Prince Andrew .

That is my point its not complicated.��

If only people were laughing with you!

This particular example of "whataboutery" might have greater resonance if your deference to the Royal Family had not led you into some dreadful arguments on this subject.

You are on record as saying Prince Andrew's accuser and victim of trafficking knew what she was getting into and where were here parents when this was happening. (the good Prince's parents are obviously beyond reproach as they would have no inkling that anything was amiss from his aides and security).

I had not hitherto seen any suggestion, evidence or innuendo that, unlike the two former Presidents, Bill Gates's friendship with Epstein involved availing himself of his tawdry criminality. Nor, unlike Prince Andrew, has anyone subject or witness to the abuse come forward to justify similar proceedings against Clinton or Trump. If there is such evidence and Maxwell's conviction triggers such an event it would be great to see justice served.

You might get more sympathy in this thread if saw the proceedings against Prince Andrew, (including giving him the opportunity to exonerate himself in a court of law) as a welcome and long overdue step rather than an opportunity to direct to every other point on the compass.

[life on mars]

Re: Maxwell guilty

If only people were laughing with you!

This particular example of "whataboutery" might have greater resonance if your deference to the Royal Family had not led you into some dreadful arguments on this subject.

You are on record as saying Prince Andrew's accuser and victim of trafficking knew what she was getting into and where were here parents when this was happening. (the good Prince's parents are obviously beyond reproach as they would have no inkling that anything was amiss from his aides and security).

I had not hitherto seen any suggestion, evidence or innuendo that, unlike the two former Presidents, Bill Gates's friendship with Epstein involved availing himself of his tawdry criminality. Nor, unlike Prince Andrew, has anyone subject or witness to the abuse come forward to justify similar proceedings against Clinton or Trump. If there is such evidence and Maxwell's conviction triggers such an event it would be great to see justice served.

You might get more sympathy in this thread if saw the proceedings against Prince Andrew, (including giving him the opportunity to exonerate himself in a court of law) as a welcome and long overdue step rather than an opportunity to direct to every other point on the compass.

Of course he is guilty and protected by privilege, back to my point as are others which doesn't seem to bother some , are we saying the lady in question only had a sexual interaction with Andrew and no one else and that's fine , surely everyone should be pursued , or is it case some are even more untouchable as their ex presidents or big profile american elite 🤔

This is bigger that Prince Andrew perverse actions but it does appear selective.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Of course he is guilty and protected by privilege, back to my point as are others which doesn't seem to bother some , are we saying the lady in question only had a sexual interaction with Andrew and no one else and that's fine , surely everyone should be pursued , or is it case some are even more untouchable as their ex presidents or big profile american elite 🤔

This is bigger that Prince Andrew perverse actions but it does appear selective.

Who are the others that are not bothered by this LoM. Apart from your crass defence of Prince Andrew by intimating that the victim knew what she was getting into I have seen no-one on this board who doesn't want justice for her and others by prosecuting perpetrators to the max.

She has named a number of other people who she was trafficked to including Alan Dershowitz. What is missing is anyone willing to come forward with evidence against others. I guess when you recall the treatment that the accuser of Brett Kavanaugh received, which you received with some glee, then you can perhaps understand why.

[willo1927]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Sincere apologies, if that’s what Wlllo meant.

I was referring to Maxwell but apologies accepted Ninnian.

[ninian opinian]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Thank you sir.

Though this was a good tweet from Brian Moore.

“ Prince Andrew- nothing screams innocence like trying to rely on an agreement settled by a paedophile, that you didn't know existed and were not named in when it was agreed.
Further, if you never met her, how are you a potential defendant?”

Judges decision due very soon according to reports.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Lets not forget that Betty Windsor (affectionately known as mummy to our prince Andy) is footing the pauper's legal fees.

Hiding behind the loophole of a dead sex trafficker? Stay classy, Andrew

Edit: déjà vu

[Dorcus]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Thank you sir.

Though this was a good tweet from Brian Moore.

“ Prince Andrew- nothing screams innocence like trying to rely on an agreement settled by a paedophile, that you didn't know existed and were not named in when it was agreed.
Further, if you never met her, how are you a potential defendant?”

Judges decision due very soon according to reports.

Poor Andy, it's a good job he can't work up a sweat. If it were me I'd be in a right lather over it

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Poor Andy, it's a good job he can't work up a sweat. If it were me I'd be in a right lather over it

Wouldn't any of us want to clear our names and distance ourselves from either Epstein or Maxwell? Wouldn't it be great PR if the royal (waster) was to man up and go and face the charges if he's nothing to hide? I'm hoping he's the first domino to help topple the lot of them. But it's the hope that kills you.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Maxwell guilty

I am having a complete mare today. Cut me some slack.

[bigjoe]

Re: Maxwell guilty

Thank you sir.

Though this was a good tweet from Brian Moore.

“ Prince Andrew- nothing screams innocence like trying to rely on an agreement settled by a paedophile, that you didn't know existed and were not named in when it was agreed.
Further, if you never met her, how are you a potential defendant?”

Judges decision due very soon according to reports.

It's a gift for the idiot. The judge will have to decide if it'd be worthwhile to try and prosecute. Maybe her team will find some point or action not covered by the agreement so at least he'd have to be tried.