Confused

[The Lone Gunman]

Re: Confused

On balance of play a point is more than fair, but on the key incidents we were robbed.

Having viewed the game just once on the Sky red button (so no replays), I'd say there were three key incidents, two of which went in City's favour - the equaliser, which certainly appeared to be offside, the sending off, which appeared soft, and the penalty incident at the end, which I'm sure would have been given had it occurred in the first half or earlier in the second.

As I say, I haven't seen any replays yet, but I don't think City were robbed today. The team managed one effort on target. West Brom looked no more than an average Championship (but it's a weak division this time around). A draw was about right.

[stan butler]

Re: Confused

Having viewed the game just once on the Sky red button (so no replays), I'd say there were three key incidents, two of which went in City's favour - the equaliser, which certainly appeared to be offside, the sending off, which appeared soft, and the penalty incident at the end, which I'm sure would have been given had it occurred in the first half or earlier in the second.

As I say, I haven't seen any replays yet, but I don't think City were robbed today. The team managed one effort on target. West Brom looked no more than an average Championship (but it's a weak division this time around). A draw was about right.

I have to agree with all of that

[dml1954]

Re: Confused

Gained for me. If West Brom had turned up today it would have been a heavy defeat.

So absolutely nothing to do with the way City played then ?

[BlueArmy 86]

Re: Confused

Defo a second yellow Mowatt, although helped by shithousary from Vaulks.

[stan butler]

Re: Confused

So absolutely nothing to do with the way City played then ?

I thought we played well today

[Tuerto]

Re: Confused

I have to agree with all of that

Same, although i didn't get a good view of the challenge that led to the sending off. It looked quite bad. If vaulks wound him up enough for him to dive in like that on the touchline when the ball is going nowhere, then good work Vaulks.

[Tuerto]

Re: Confused

So absolutely nothing to do with the way City played then ?

I think that both teams performance was pretty poor. Decent battling performance from City.

[stan butler]

Re: Confused

Same, although i didn't get a good view of the challenge that led to the sending off. It looked quite. If vaulks wound him up enough for him to dive in like that on the touchline when the ball is going nowhere, then good work Vaulks.

First time i saw it i thought maybe a yellow and having seen it again i'd still say no more than a yellow

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Confused

You’ve got to leave your brain to science mate
They’d have a field day 😂.

[NYCBlue]

Re: Confused

I’ll go a point gained but an opportunity lost.

I'll go along with this.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Confused

No she would be an odd looking women

There's only one of her.

[stan butler]

Re: Confused

There's only one of her.

My spelling is shit

[Dorcus]

Re: Confused

So absolutely nothing to do with the way City played then ?

We were only soso until the red card and then improved.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Confused

Same, although i didn't get a good view of the challenge that led to the sending off. It looked quite bad. If vaulks wound him up enough for him to dive in like that on the touchline when the ball is going nowhere, then good work Vaulks.

He's definitely had a bit more of an edge to him recently. I quite like that. He was doing the same against Bournemouth.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Confused

My spelling is shit

FWIW it doesn't mean shit, but I couldn't help myself