So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

[Cyclops]

Blimey! :shrug:

[2b2bdoo]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

I think it’s the right call if Hugill isn’t well enough to start. Suppose you can make a case for Davies but could be a good impact sub.

[Rjk]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

that Fulham lineup is very strong

[Michael Morris]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Hugill and Davies will start on Tuesday. Today was seen as a free hit. Tuesday is a more important game to win.

[Nobody's Rep]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

that Fulham lineup is very strong

Don't think that line up will survive the premiership they are going to have invest heavily again

[life on mars]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Took a loss win Tuesday

[Alfresco]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Colwill is never going to be a striker. Much better in midfield. What was Morison thinking playing him before Davies.

[BLUEAWAY]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Blimey! :shrug:

Lots of sickness within the squad which forced changes.

[stan butler]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Colwill is never going to be a striker. Much better in midfield. What was Morison thinking playing him before Davies.

Resting Davies or giving Colwill some minutes? Who in the squad had this illness was Davies one of them?

[Alfresco]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Resting Davies or giving Colwill some minutes? Who in the squad had this illness was Davies one of them?

I'm no manager but I would have played Colwill midfield dropped Vaulks to the bench and played Davies up front.

[Madassa]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Resting Davies or giving Colwill some minutes? Who in the squad had this illness was Davies one of them?

(Meant to respond to Alfresco sorry) Well I'm sure Colwil and Davies as a front two would've been more threatening than Collins & anyone today.

[J R Hartley]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

(Meant to respond to Alfresco sorry) Well I'm sure Colwil and Davies as a front two would've been more threatening than Collins & anyone today.

Don’t talk daft. Collins was up against Ream, he would have eaten Colwill alive.

[Madassa]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

Don’t talk daft. Collins was up against Ream, he would have eaten Colwill alive.

I disagree completely. As evidence I would point out that Davies won more ball against the 'Galatico' Ream in the time he was on than Collins did all game. Morrison must've agreed as he appeared to drop Collins into the No10 role and pushed Davies up against Ream and Tosin. Anyone who thinks Collins will ever be a better No10 than Colwill is bonkers in my view

[J R Hartley]

Re: So Collins and Colwill are City's preferred strikers !

I disagree completely. As evidence I would point out that Davies won more ball against the 'Galatico' Ream in the time he was on than Collins did all game. Morrison must've agreed as he appeared to drop Collins into the No10 role and pushed Davies up against Ream and Tosin. Anyone who thinks Collins will ever be a better No10 than Colwill is bonkers in my view

We didn’t play with a 10 we just had 11 men behind the ball for large parts of the game. Gave it a go last 15 minutes and Fulham become a bit complacent in midfield when Reed went off, gave a lot of loose balls away and caused themselves problems.

Davies worked hard without the ball as he always does but he didn’t cause Ream any problems. One tame shot from the edge of area.

Ream was superb, he was too good for any of the forwards out there today, whatever combination we tried. Hugill may have caused him more problems if he wasn’t Ill.