Wagatha Christie.

[William Treseder]

Jamie Vardy and Wayne Rooney, will surely be cringing about this court case.

[Hilts]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

I doubt it.

[tforturton]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Jamie Vardy and Wayne Rooney, will surely be cringing about this court case.

I should imagine that, like everyone else, they don't give a f*ck....

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

You'd wonder how anyone on here cares enough to mention it as well, to be fair.

[William Treseder]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

You'd wonder how anyone on here cares enough to mention it as well, to be fair.

Sorry boss. Just caught it on the news whilst eating my tea.
You seem to have cared enough to read the thread and reply?

[Hungry Blue]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

What about poor Pete's "chipolata"?

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Sorry boss. Just caught it on the news whilst eating my tea.
You seem to have cared enough to read the thread and reply?

I'm not going tit for tat. My reply was on the back of your commenting on it being cringeworthy.

It is and it's not the type of thing I ever expected being discussed on here, if it is it is, if it gets 10 pages of in depth discussion, great.

I just didn't think anyone on here would care hence my reply.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Libel cases are interesting and, as I understand it, usually the domain of the wealthy and where the 'winners' are not able to recover their full costs (which are often astronomical) from the opposition. A media lawyer has estimated that the case will cost each party around £1m and the winner will be re-imbursed around 70% of their costs only and a mere £15K-£40K in damages - leaving a deficit of around £300K. The loser will pay hugely, of course.
During some trials such as this, and indeed the Heard v Depp trial, information about poor behaviour and serious character defects on both sides can be exposed and neither party may come out the other end with much credit.
It seems a extremely expensive poker game where only the lawyers really win.

[MacAdder]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

You'd wonder how anyone on here cares enough to mention it as well, to be fair.

Agree. The OP is not even worth the time replying about.

[SunderlandBluebird]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Libel cases are interesting and, as I understand it, usually the domain of the wealthy and where the 'winners' are not able to recover their full costs (which are often astronomical) from the opposition. A media lawyer has estimated that the case will cost each party around £1m and the winner will be re-imbursed around 70% of their costs only and a mere £15K-£40K in damages - leaving a deficit of around £300K. The loser will pay hugely, of course.
During some trials such as this, and indeed the Heard v Depp trial, information about poor behaviour and serious character defects on both sides can be exposed and neither party may come out the other end with much credit.
It seems a extremely expensive poker game where only the lawyers really win.

I doubt the money makes a big difference to either but the ego in allowing it to get to court from Vardy's side is mental. She will probably "legally" win the case that it can't be proven it was her that leaked the specific story as a couple of people had access to her account, but she has been exposed via whatsapp convos on trying to sell numerous stories on Drinkwater, Mahrez etc to a rag like the sun for relative peanuts and comes across a c*nt, baffling all round!

[Rjk]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

https://twitter.com/tompeck/status/1524687491336478720?t=4MnaH2CFwt9dKz0hj0muNA&s=19

[North Cardiff Blue]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

What about poor Pete's "chipolata"?

Poor old Pete, he's finished on the pulling front, although I doubt Jordan would have hung around for as long if that was true?

She'd have been on to the next one before he'd finished the frst line of mysterious girl!

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Poor old Pete, he's finished on the pulling front, although I doubt Jordan would have hung around for as long if that was true?

She'd have been on to the next one before he'd finished the frst line of mysterious girl!

Some of these celeb couples are a but more complicated, perhaps she could put up with the tiny manhood for the extra fame it brought them being a couple?

[William Treseder]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Agree. The OP is not even worth the time replying about.

That’s being William Tresederist. Reported 😂

[William Treseder]

Re: Wagatha Christie.

Agree. The OP is not even worth the time replying about.

Yet Maddonas clunge is being discussed on another thread 😂