Lithuania Next?

[Cleve van Leef]

Russia not very happy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61878929

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Russia not very happy.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61878929

Lithuania is a member of NATO and Russia has enough on its plate in Ukraine.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Lithuania is a member of NATO and Russia has enough on its plate in Ukraine.

They don't call it the breadbasket of the world for nothing.

[blue matt]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Lithuania is a member of NATO and Russia has enough on its plate in Ukraine.

trouble is will that bother him ? ? ?, the world has watched on as he destroys parts of the Ukraine ( I know we have supplied equipment to help the Ukrainians, but they needed much more ) " he has nukes dont you know " was the cry while we raised Ukrainian flags

[tforturton]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Surely he's not daft enough to attack a Nato country?

[Rock_Flock_of_Five]

Re: Lithuania Next?

trouble is will that bother him ? ? ?, the world has watched on as he destroys parts of the Ukraine ( I know we have supplied equipment to help the Ukrainians, but they needed much more ) " he has nukes dont you know " was the cry while we raised Ukrainian flags

The world hasn't just watched on. You've acknowledged that we (those that value democracy) have supplied equipment.
Ukraine are getting powerful kit, we have to stop short of sending in our jets and foot soldiers for obvious reasons.
Putin and his cronies act like they are the only ones who possess nuclear weapons.
Russia could never launch a nuclear attack on a small island such as the UK. We have an 'always at sea' nuclear armed submarine, that at the very least would turn Moscow to dust. That's a price that the Kremlin wouldn't be prepared to pay.

[TWGL1]

Re: Lithuania Next?

[QUOTE=Rock_Flock_of_Five;5312306]The world hasn't just watched on. You've acknowledged that we (those that value democracy) have supplied equipment.
Ukraine are getting powerful kit, we have to stop short of sending in our jets and foot soldiers for obvious reasons.
Putin and his cronies act like they are the only ones who possess nuclear weapons.
Russia could never launch a nuclear attack on a small island such as the UK. We have an 'always at sea' nuclear armed submarine, that at the very least would turn Moscow to dust. That's a price that the Kremlin wouldn't be prepared to pay.[/

Ukraine the beacon of Democracy!! They just made the party that got 45% of the vote illegal and stole all their assets

[The Hooded Claw]

Re: Lithuania Next?

An attack on one NATO country is an attack on all NATO countries. It’s in the constitution, so if 💩tin is really that stupid, then we’ll have a Third World War on our hands.

[Sparticus_Mills]

Re: Lithuania Next?

An attack on one NATO country is an attack on all NATO countries. It’s in the constitution, so if ��tin is really that stupid, then we’ll have a Third World War on our hands.

Like THC said, they attack Lithuania, they'll invoke Article 5, which will mean Russia is at war with all of NATO. Is Putin that mad?

[Sparticus_Mills]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Ukraine the beacon of Democracy!! They just made the party that got 45% of the vote illegal and stole all their assets[/QUOTE]

I don't know where you got that from? They banned a pro Russian party (Opposition Platform—For Life), that got 13.05% of the vote in the 2019 Parliamentary elections.

[TWGL1]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Ukraine the beacon of Democracy!! They just made the party that got 45% of the vote illegal and stole all their assets

I don't know where you got that from? They banned a pro Russian party (Opposition Platform—For Life), that got 13.05% of the vote in the 2019 Parliamentary elections.[/QUOTE]

https://www.leftvoice.org/president-zelenskyy-bans-opposition-parties-in-ukraine/

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: Lithuania Next?

Surely he's not daft enough to attack a Nato country?

If he is that daft there's always the possibility that his generals (or what's left of them) don't comply.

[Sparticus_Mills]

Re: Lithuania Next?

https://www.leftvoice.org/president-...es-in-ukraine/[/QUOTE]


Where did you get "45% of the vote" from?

[blue matt]

Re: Lithuania Next?

The world hasn't just watched on. You've acknowledged that we (those that value democracy) have supplied equipment.
Ukraine are getting powerful kit, we have to stop short of sending in our jets and foot soldiers for obvious reasons.
Putin and his cronies act like they are the only ones who possess nuclear weapons.
Russia could never launch a nuclear attack on a small island such as the UK. We have an 'always at sea' nuclear armed submarine, that at the very least would turn Moscow to dust. That's a price that the Kremlin wouldn't be prepared to pay.

we (those that value democracy, I like that saying ) have supplied arms, we have promised heavy units and delivered very little of them as yet, Zelensky has said for weeks they need more, they have been crying out for more heavy ammunition as they are almost out, the Russian artillery outnumber the Ukrainians by 15 - 1 ( some say 20 - 1 ) , the west have supplied under 10% of the Ukrainian artillery , Ben Wallace said we would send the M270 MLRS at the start of June ( we currently have 40 - 50 available to use, with another few coming online soon ) now I am not saying send them all, but we need to make good on the promise, I even saw one in the last few weeks driving over Salisbury plains

I said from the start, we need to go all in, if we are going to supply, lets go big

[goats]

Re: Lithuania Next?

If he is that daft there's always the possibility that his generals (or what's left of them) don't comply.

Maybe the strangely subdued Russian people might finally rise up?