Robert Glatzel

[Ninian1962]

Continuing his fine form for SV Hamburg.

3 goals in 3 games so far this season.

[Colin'sReversibleHat]

Re: Robert Glatzel

Good for him, not in a sarky way- always seemed a likeable guy.

Not buying into this notion for one second though that he'd score hatfuls in this current team- seems to be the trendy thing to say on Twitter. The German 2nd division is his level by the looks.

[WJ99mobile]

Re: Robert Glatzel

He was played as a target man just because he was tall

Don’t think he would have the pace to do anything in this team.

[Rjk]

Re: Robert Glatzel

He was played as a target man just because he was tall

Don’t think he would have the pace to do anything in this team.

like Zohore and Cornelius before him, hopefully we don't make the same mistake with Etete

[2b2bdoo]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I would start him in this current team ahead of anyone we have that’s for sure.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I would start him in this current team ahead of anyone we have that’s for sure.

[Hilts]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I think its likely Max Watters gets moved on and bangs in goals at a lower level we will get Watters threads.

Glatzel was a terrible signing and not good enough.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I think its likely Max Watters gets moved on and bangs in goals at a lower level we will get Watters threads.

Glatzel was a terrible signing and not good enough.

That's already happened! That's why he was recalled. I blame this board.

[2b2bdoo]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I think its likely Max Watters gets moved on and bangs in goals at a lower level we will get Watters threads.

Glatzel was a terrible signing and not good enough.

He was a terrible signing, paid over the odds and big wages for someone that didn’t fit how we played.

Still would be ahead of anyone we have now, in fact I think he would be great in what Morison says he wants his strikers to do.

[Hilts]

Re: Robert Glatzel

He was a terrible signing, paid over the odds and big wages for someone that didn’t fit how we played.

Still would be ahead of anyone we have now, in fact I think he would be great in what Morison says he wants his strikers to do.

I think he would be far from great. I literally had no idea what strengths he had.

Id rather Harris , Davies and even Colwill.

[City123]

Re: Robert Glatzel

Good for him, not in a sarky way- always seemed a likeable guy.

Not buying into this notion for one second though that he'd score hatfuls in this current team- seems to be the trendy thing to say on Twitter. The German 2nd division is his level by the looks.

We don't create anywhere near enough for him to score the amounts I've seen people on Twitter say he'd score

He also isn't good enough to score the amount they think he would

[City123]

Re: Robert Glatzel

He was a terrible signing, paid over the odds and big wages for someone that didn’t fit how we played.

Still would be ahead of anyone we have now, in fact I think he would be great in what Morison says he wants his strikers to do.

From what we've seen Morison wants players who press hard and strikers to hold the ball up, Glatzel showed neither of those qualities. He doesn't have the pace to press as effectively as Morison wants, and we all saw how poor he was at hold up play

[Rock_Flock_of_Five]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I think his goal scoring exploits says more about the standard of German second tier football, than it does about Robert Glatzel.

[Hilts]

Re: Robert Glatzel

I think his goal scoring exploits says more about the standard of German second tier football, than it does about Robert Glatzel.

Totally agree. Ive even seen a few headers go in.

But apparently we didnt play to his mysterious strenghts.😂

[poc]

Re: Robert Glatzel

From what we've seen Morison wants players who press hard and strikers to hold the ball up, Glatzel showed neither of those qualities. He doesn't have the pace to press as effectively as Morison wants, and we all saw how poor he was at hold up play

-