Hugill Return??

[life on mars]

I wonder ??

[2b2bdoo]

Re: Hugill Return??

I think he would be perfect for how we set up.

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Hugill Return??

I think he would be perfect for how we set up.

Better than anything that we have.

At least he holds the ball up and doesn’t concede possession easily unlike Watters.

[Blue blood]

Re: Hugill Return??

Better than anything that we have.

At least he holds the ball up and doesn’t concede possession easily unlike Watters.

Agreed, and he can put the ball in the net…..unlike Watters!

[tforturton]

Re: Hugill Return??

We need someone desperately.

[LeningradCowboy]

Re: Hugill Return??

Better than anything that we have.

At least he holds the ball up and doesn’t concede possession easily unlike Watters.

Harris and Watters aren't good enough.

[2b2bdoo]

Re: Hugill Return??

I’ve said it before but I think we need at least two strikers.

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Hugill Return??

Harris and Watters aren't good enough.

And both are ahead of Etete in the pecking order...

[LeningradCowboy]

Re: Hugill Return??

And both are ahead of Etete in the pecking order...

I think they're all third choice.

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Hugill Return??

I think they're all third choice.

They're all lacking, Watters has zero confidence and isn't very quick or strong. Harris is quite quick and works hard but is terrible, and Etete is, well, I don't really know what he is yet but he doesn't look very good.

Our midfield is also an issue, there is no way we're getting more than 5 goals out of those 3. They never get in the box.

[B. Oddie]

Re: Hugill Return??

They're all lacking, Watters has zero confidence and isn't very quick or strong. Harris is quite quick and works hard but is terrible, and Etete is, well, I don't really know what he is yet but he doesn't look very good.

Our midfield is also an issue, there is no way we're getting more than 5 goals out of those 3. They never get in the box.

I wouldn't say that Watters is necessarily weak as he's at least had a few instances of holding his own against defenders. He looks more clumsy than anything.

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Hugill Return??

I wouldn't say that Watters is necessarily weak as he's at least had a few instances of holding his own against defenders. He looks more clumsy than anything.

He's not weak but he isn't very strong either. He's not up to it, let's be honest. Neither is Harris and Etete is third choice... Being the worst of a bad bunch isn't ideal.

[LA Bluebird]

Re: Hugill Return??

Etete is going to take some time, you can tell some good physical qualities are there but I'm really struggling to see how he fits in with the style that Morrison wants to play. Considering our limited coffers, maybe a bit of strange one.

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Hugill Return??

I wouldn't say that Watters is necessarily weak as he's at least had a few instances of holding his own against defenders. He looks more clumsy than anything.

I disagree completely.

One of my many frustrations with him is that he gets bullied by opposing defenders ALL the time.

[WJ99mobile]

Re: Hugill Return??

I disagree completely.

One of my many frustrations with him is that he gets bullied by opposing defenders ALL the time.

Augero wasn’t exactly worlds strongest man and one of the best strikers on the planet