If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Next match: Pre-season. Saturday, July 11th | FC Midtjylland (H) @ Cardiff City Stadium, 12:30pm -
All pre-season fixtures
2026 / 27 Fixtures to be announced June 25th
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Articles of Association ammendment / special resolution
On the face of it seems a bit weird and certainly worthy of explanation by the club to shareholders as to why the resolution should be agreed by existing shareholders. The notice just asks shareholders to vote on it without any such explanation but, then again, it will be passed anyway because of the overwhelming majority of shares Vincent Tan holds.
The resolution would give the directors the power to block any transfer of existing shares to anyone who does not pass the EFL Owner and Directors Test and be confirmed as complying by the EFL but why would they want to? Restricts who Vincent Tan can transfer his shares to so why would he want to impose that restriction on himself?
Certainly needs to club to explain the shy and wherefore to other shareholders but i suspect that they will regard their views as unimportant
On the face of it seems a bit weird and certainly worthy of explanation by the club to shareholders as to why the resolution should be agreed by existing shareholders. The notice just asks shareholders to vote on it without any such explanation but, then again, it will be passed anyway because of the overwhelming majority of shares Vincent Tan holds.
The resolution would give the directors the power to block any transfer of existing shares to anyone who does not pass the EFL Owner and Directors Test and be confirmed as complying by the EFL but why would they want to? Restricts who Vincent Tan can transfer his shares to so why would he want to impose that restriction on himself?
Certainly needs to club to explain the shy and wherefore to other shareholders but i suspect that they will regard their views as unimportant
Would Tan only want to transfer shares to whoever he wanted in any case, so it would hardly be an issue to him?
On the face of it seems a bit weird and certainly worthy of explanation by the club to shareholders as to why the resolution should be agreed by existing shareholders. The notice just asks shareholders to vote on it without any such explanation but, then again, it will be passed anyway because of the overwhelming majority of shares Vincent Tan holds.
The resolution would give the directors the power to block any transfer of existing shares to anyone who does not pass the EFL Owner and Directors Test and be confirmed as complying by the EFL but why would they want to? Restricts who Vincent Tan can transfer his shares to so why would he want to impose that restriction on himself?
Certainly needs to club to explain the shy and wherefore to other shareholders but i suspect that they will regard their views as unimportant
On the face of it the resolution appears to be 'a good thing' - even if it is hard to understand why the club/Tan would want to adopt this restriction, and annoying that there is (again) no explanation.
But enough of that. What do you think of Mike's kitchen work surfaces? Got to say, I'm impressed!
On the face of it the resolution appears to be 'a good thing' - even if it is hard to understand why the club/Tan would want to adopt this restriction, and annoying that there is (again) no explanation.
But enough of that. What do you think of Mike's kitchen work surfaces? Got to say, I'm impressed!
Re: Articles of Association ammendment / special resolution
I'd suggest that the intention is to protect the club from an untenable position should Vincent Tan sell his shares to someone who fails the tests set out, although I'd imagine that he would insert the same provisions in any sale agreement document anyway.
I'd suggest that the intention is to protect the club from an untenable position should Vincent Tan sell his shares to someone who fails the tests set out, although I'd imagine that he would insert the same provisions in any sale agreement document anyway.
But the directors wouldn't dare put forward a resolution that restricts Vincent Tan`s actions and he will have to vote it through anyway.
Other shareholders such as Michael Isaac would be restricted if he wanted to transfer his shares (is this the reason?) but his shareholding is so small now that it wouldn`t have any adverse impact on VTs control of the club
Re: Articles of Association ammendment / special resolution
I wonder if it’s so that in the event of a sale of the club, Tan can make it so that the existing minority shareholders have to sell to him for subsequent resale to a new investor (who would be expected to pass the test) or directly to the new investor rather than another minority shareholder.
Therefore is it possible that the club might be subject to a full or partial sale in the near future?
Nice kitchen, by the way.
But the directors wouldn't dare put forward a resolution that restricts Vincent Tan`s actions and he will have to vote it through anyway.
Other shareholders such as Michael Isaac would be restricted if he wanted to transfer his shares (is this the reason?) but his shareholding is so small now that it wouldn`t have any adverse impact on VTs control of the club
I'm sure this would only be put forward with Vincent Tan's agreement, for the reasons I've suggested. The restrictions set out would not be relevant to any minority shareholders.
Comment